Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-13,12

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
MyBook is a cheap paperback edition of the original book and will be sold at uniform, low price.

What Has Aristotelian Dialectic to Offer a Neoplatonist? A Possible Sample of Iamblichus at Simplicius on the Categories 12,10-13,12

Full text article:

  • HTML
  • XML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites

image of The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition

Abstract Simplicius in Cat. 12,10-13,12 presents an interesting justification for the study of Aristotle’s Categories, based in Neoplatonic psychology and metaphysics. I suggest that this passage could be regarded as a testimonium to Iamblichus’ reasons for endorsing Porphyry’s selection of the Categories as an introductory text of Platonic philosophy. These Iamblichean arguments, richly grounded in Neoplatonic metaphysics and psychology, may have exercised an influence comparable to Porphyry’s.

1. Bodéüs R. Catégories 2001 Belles Lettres
2. Chase M. Simplicius: On Aristotle Categories 2003 Duckworth 1 4
3. Chiaradonna R. Sostanza, Movimento, Analogia. Plotino critico di Aristotele 2002 Bibliopolis
4. Dillon J. "‘Iamblichus’s Noera Theoriaof Aristotle’s Categories’" Syllecta Classica 1997 Vol 8 65 77 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/syl.1997.0013
5. Ebbesen S. Sorabji R.R.K. "‘Porphyry’s legacy to logic: A reconstruction’" Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence 1990 Duckworth and Cornell UP. 141 172
6. Ebbesen S. Frede D. , Inwood B. "‘Theories of language in the Hellenistic age and in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries’" Language and Learning: Philosophy of Language in the Hellenistic Age 2005 CUP 299 319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511482526.012
7. Frede M. Essays in Ancient Philosophy 1987 Oxford
8. Gerson L. Aristotle and other Platonists 2006 Cornell UP
9. de Haas F.A.J. "‘Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle’s Categories?’ " Phronesis 2001 Vol 46 492 526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156852801753736517
10. Hoffmann Ph. Hadot I. "‘Catégories et langage selon Simplicius—la question du ‘ skopos’ du traité aristotélicien des Catégories’" Simplicius, sa vie, son œuvre, sa survie; actes du colloque international de Paris 1987 Peripatoi 15. De Gruyter. 61 90 1987 (28 sept. 1-oct 1985)
11. Karamanolis G. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement: Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry 2006 Oxford http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199264562.001.0001
12. Moraux P. Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias 1973 I. Berlin-NY.
13. Newton L. A. Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories 2008 Leiden Brill
14. Sorabji R.R.K. Time, Creation and the Continuum: Theories in Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages 1983 Duckworth and Cornell UP
15. Strange S. "‘Plotinus, Porphyry, and the Neoplatonic Interpretation of the Categories’" ANRW 1987 Vol 2 36.2 955 974
16. Szlezák T. A. Pseudo-Archytas Über die Kategorien 1972 Peripatoi 4. De Gruyter http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110835458
17. Tarrant H. "‘Eudorus and the Early Platonist Interpretation of the Categories’" Laval théologique et philosophique 2008 Vol 64 3 583 595 http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/037692ar
18. Wedin M. Aristotle’s Theory of Substance 2000 Oxford
19. FN1 1)See for example Ebbesen 1990, 2005; Newton 2008; Karamanolis 2006; Gerson 2005. On the early Platonist interpretation of the Categoriesin particular, see Tarrant 2008.
20. FN2 2)See Chiaradonna 2002, 2005; Strange 1987; De Haas 2001; Evangeliou 1988.
21. FN3 3)While Alexandrians following Ammonius agree on ascribing the synthetic solution (words + concepts + referents) to Iamblichus, they disagree on which earlier commentators took which partial view (for example, Olympiodorus ascribes the verbal interpretation to Porphyry and the conceptualist interpretation to Alexander, while Philoponus ascribes the conceptualist interpretation to Porphyry and the verbal interpretation to Alexander).
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341234
2012-01-01
2015-07-07

Affiliations: 1: The University of British Columbia michael.griffin@ubc.ca

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to email alerts
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Your details
    Name:*
    Email:*
    Department:*
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
     
     
     
    Other:
     
    The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition — Recommend this title to your library

    Thank you

    Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation