Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access Non enim ab hiis que sensus est iudicare sensum.Sensation and Thought in Theaetetus, Plotinus and Proclus

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Non enim ab hiis que sensus est iudicare sensum.Sensation and Thought in Theaetetus, Plotinus and Proclus

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

I examine the relation between sensation and discursive thought (dianoia) in Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus. In Theaetetus, a soul whose highest faculty was sensation would have no unified experience of the sensible world, lacking universal ideas to give order to the sensible flux. It is implied that such universals are grasped by the soul’s thinking. In Plotinus the soul is not passive when it senses the world, but as the logos of all things it thinks the world through its own forms.Proclus argues against the derivation of universal logoi from the senses, which alone can’t make the sensible world comprehensible. At most they give a record of the original sense-impression in its particularity. The soul’s own projected logoi give the sensible world stability. For Proclus, bare sensation does not depend on thought, but a unified experience of the sense-world depends on its paradigmatic logoi in our souls.

Affiliations: 1: Carleton UniversityOttawagregory.macisaac@carleton.ca

I examine the relation between sensation and discursive thought (dianoia) in Plato, Plotinus, and Proclus. In Theaetetus, a soul whose highest faculty was sensation would have no unified experience of the sensible world, lacking universal ideas to give order to the sensible flux. It is implied that such universals are grasped by the soul’s thinking. In Plotinus the soul is not passive when it senses the world, but as the logos of all things it thinks the world through its own forms.Proclus argues against the derivation of universal logoi from the senses, which alone can’t make the sensible world comprehensible. At most they give a record of the original sense-impression in its particularity. The soul’s own projected logoi give the sensible world stability. For Proclus, bare sensation does not depend on thought, but a unified experience of the sense-world depends on its paradigmatic logoi in our souls.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/18725473/8/2/18725473_008_02_s003_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341287&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341287
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Blumenthal H.J. Plotinus’ Psychology, his doctrine of the embodied soul 1971 The Hague Martinus Nijhoff http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-2989-6
2. Blumenthal H.J. "‘Proclus on perception’" Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 1982 Vol 29 1 11 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1982.tb00507.x
3. Blumenthal H.J. Huby P. , Neal G. "‘Plotinus and Proclus on the criterion of truth’" The Criterion of Truth. Essays written in honour of George Kerfeld 1989 Liverpool Liverpool U.P. 257 280
4. Blumenthal H.J. "‘Some Neoplatonic views on perception and memory: similarities, differences and motivations’" Traditions of Platonism, Essays in honour of John Dillon 1999 Aldershot Ashgate 319 335
5. Blumenthal H.J. Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity, Interpretations of the De Anima 1996 Ithaca Cornell U.P.
6. Corrigan K. "‘The internal dimensions of the sensible object in the thought of Plotinus and Aristotle’" Dionysius 1981 Vol 5 98 126
7. Emilsson E.K. Plotinus on sense-perception: A philosophical study 1988 Cambridge Cambridge U.P. 1988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720017
8. Heidegger M. Krell D.F. "‘The Origin of the Work of Art’" Basic Writings 1977 New York Harper and Row 1971
9. Helmig C. "‘Proclus and Other Neoplatonists on Universals and Predication’" Documenti e Studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 2008 Vol 19 31 52
10. Helmig C. de Haas F. , Leunissen M. , Martijn M. "‘Proclus’ criticism of Aristotle’s theory of abstraction and concept formation in Analytica PosterioraII 19’" Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Late Antiquity and beyond 2010 Leiden/Boston Brill 27 54 (Philosophia Antiqua 124)
11. Lautner P. Perkams M. , Piccione R.M. "‘Some Clarifications on Proclus’ Fourfold Division of Sense-Perception in the Timaeus Commentary’" Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Akten der Konferenz in Jena am 18.-20. September 2003 2006 Leiden/Boston Brill 117 135 Philosophia antiqua 98
12. MacIsaac D.G. The Soul and discursive reason in the Philosophy of Proclus 2001 (Ph.D. Thesis, U. Notre Dame IN, 2001, unpublished)
13. MacIsaac D.G. "‘The Soul and the Virtues in Proclus’" Commentary on the Republic of Plato’ Philosophie Antique 2009 Vol 9 115 143
14. MacIsaac D.G. Lernould A. "‘ Noêsis,dialectique et mathématiques dans le Commentaire aux Éléments d’Euclidede Proclus,’" Études sur le Commentaire de Proclus au premier livre des Éléments d’Euclide 2010 Presses Universitaires du Septentrion 125 138
15. MacIsaac D.G. "‘The Nousof the Partial Soul in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Alcibiades of Plato’ " Dionysius 2011 Vol 29 29 60
16. MacIsaac D.G. "‘Geometrical First Principles in Proclus’ Commentary on the First Book of Euclid’s Elements’" Phronesis 2014 Vol 59 44 98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341260
17. Steel C. Cleary J. "‘Breathing thought: Proclus on the innate knowledge of the soul’" The perennial tradition of neoplatonism 1997 Leuven Leuven University Press, 293 309
18. Trouillard J. L’Un et lâme selon Proclos 1972 Paris Belles Lettres
19. Trouillard J. La mystagogie de Proclos 1982 Paris Belles Lettres
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341287
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341287
2014-08-20
2017-12-16

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation