Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A Gnostic Icarus? Traces of the Controversy Between Plotinus and the Gnostics Over a Surprising Source for the Fall of Sophia: The Pseudo-Platonic 2nd Letter

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition

In several iterations of the Gnostic ontogenetic myth, we find variations on an intriguing notion: namely, that the first rupture in the otherwise eternal and continuous procession of ‘aeons’ in the divine ‘pleroma’ is caused by a cognitive overreach and failure (the “fall of Sophia”). As much as it might contain a distant echo of certain myths concerning hubris in the classical tradition or in biblical literature, this general schema of cognitive overreach—cognitive failure—fall has no obvious parallel in Greek philosophy prior to Plotinus, in some of whose more pessimistic accounts of hypostatic procession we find a similar schema, in which the generation of each ontological stratum occurs as the result of a cognitive failure on the superjacent level. If Plotinus borrowed this schema from the Gnostics, one might ask how the latter came up with it in the first place. In response, this paper makes the following three points. [1] Gnostic thinkers ultimately derived this schema from a particular juxtaposition of two profoundly aporetic Platonic passages referring to the travails of the individual soul, one certainly genuine (the description of the unexplained but catastrophic fall of the soul that fails to follow the heavenly train of the gods through the intelligible realm at Phaedrus 248c2-d3), the other quite possibly spurious (the claim that the cause of all evils is the desire, and the failure, of the soul to understand the nature of the notoriously enigmatic ‘King,’ ‘Second,’ and ‘Third,’ at 2nd Letter 312e1-313a6). [2] The Platonizing Sethian Gnostics closest to Plotinus also employed this latter source text to justify their conception of the individual soul, whose vicissitudes were understood to parallel those of Sophia. [3] This hypothesis is confirmed by evidence of tacit anti-Gnostic argumentation alluding to the 2nd Letter throughout Plotinus’ oeuvre.

Affiliations: 1: Université Laval zekemazur@gmail.com

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341348
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Armstrong A. H.The Cambridge History of Later Greek and Early Medieval Philosophy1967CambridgeCambridge University Press
2. Atkinson M.Ennead V.1: On the Three Principle Hypostases1983OxfordOxford University Press
3. Baladi N."“Origine et signification de l’audace chez Plotin”"Le Néoplatonisme. Royaumont, 9-13 juin 19691971ParisÉditions du CNRS8999
4. Brisson L. O’Cleary J. J."“The Platonic Background in the Apocalypse of Zostrianos: Numenius and Letter II attributed to Plato”"The Tradition of Platonism: Essays in Honour of John Dillon1999AldershotAshgate173188
5. Dörrie H."“Der König: Ein platonisches Schlüsselwort, von Plotin mit neuem Sinn erfüllt”"Revue Internationale de Philosophie1970Vol 24217235
6. Dubois J.-D."“La tristesse et les larmes de Sophia dans la gnose valentinienne”"Mythos2010Vol 44151
7. Funk W.-P., Scopello M., Poirier P.-H., Turner J. D.L’Allogène (nh xi,3)2004QuébecLes Presses de l’Université Laval[Bibliotèque copte de Nag Hammadi, Section “Concordances” 7]
8. Goehring J. E."“A Classical Influence on the Gnostic Sophia Myth”"Vigiliae Christianae1981Vol 3511623
9. Jonas H. Schuhl M. P. M., Hadot P."“The Soul in Gnosticism and Plotinus”"Le Néoplatonisme1971ParisCNRS4553
10. Krämer H.-J.Der Ursprung der Geistmetaphysik: Unterschungen zur Geschichte des Platonismus zwischen Platon und Plotin1964AmsterdamSchippers
11. MacRae G. W."“The Jewish Background of the Gnostic Sophia Myth”"Novum Testamentum1970Vol 1286101
12. Mansfeld J."Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy"Philosophia Antiqua1992Vol 56LeidenBrill
13. Mazur Z. Finamore J., Berchman R."“Plotinus’ Philosophical Opposition to Gnosticism and the Axiom of Continuous Hierarchy”"History of Platonism: Plato Redivivus2005New OrleansUniversity Press of the South95112
14. Mazur Z. Corrigan K., Rasimus T., et al"“‘Those Who Ascend to the Sanctuaries of the Temples’: The Gnostic Context of Plotinus’ First Treatise, i.6[1] On Beauty”"Gnosticism, Platonism, and the Late Ancient World. Essays in Honour of John D. Turner2013LeidenBrill329368[Nag Hammadi and Manichaean Studies 82]
15. Mazur Z."“Forbidden Knowledge: Cognitive Transgression and ‘Ascent Above Intellect’ in the Debate Between Plotinus and the Gnostics”"Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies2016Vol 11-286109
16. Mazur Z. Marsola M. P., Ferroni L."“Traces of the Competition,” forthcoming = “Traces of the Competition Between the Platonizing Sethian Gnostics and Plotinus’ Circle: The Case of Zostrianos 44-46”"Estratégias anti-gnósticas nos escritos de Plotino. Atas do colóquio internacional realizado em São Paulo em 18-19 de março 2012São PauloRosari et Paulus
17. Narbonne J.-M."“A Doctrinal Evolution in Plotinus? The Weakness of the Soul in Relation to Evil”"Dionysius2007Vol 257792
18. Narbonne J.-M.Plotinus in Dialogue with the Gnostics2011LeidenBrill
19. O’Brien D."“Le Volontaire et la nécessité: réflexions sur la descente de l’âme dans la philosophie de Plotin”"Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger1977Vol 1764401422
20. O’Brien D."Théodicé Plotiniénne, Théodicée Gnostique"Philosophia Antiqua1993Vol 57LeidenBrill
21. Puech H.-C."“Plotin et les Gnostiques”"Les sources de Plotin1960Vandoeuvres-GenèveFondation Hardt161190[Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 5]
22. Rist J. M."“Neopythagoreanism and Plato’s Second Letter”"Phronesis1965Vol 107881
23. Saffrey H. D., Westerink L. G.Proclus: Théologie platonicienne1974Vol vol. 2ParisBelles Lettres
24. Torchia N. J.Plotinus, Tolma, and the Descent of Being: an Exposition and Analysis1993Vol 135New YorkPeter LangAmerican University Studies Series v
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341348
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18725473-12341348
2017-04-18
2018-05-27

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation