Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access The Egyptian Chronology from the Start of the Twenty-Second until the End of The Twenty-Fifth Dynasty: Facts, Suppositions and Arguments*

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

The Egyptian Chronology from the Start of the Twenty-Second until the End of The Twenty-Fifth Dynasty: Facts, Suppositions and Arguments*

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Egyptian History

A recent proposition by R. Morkot and P. James to shorten the period from the start of the Twenty-second until the end of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty prompted the author to investigate what unquestionable chronological data we have, what are the theories and suppositions founded on those data and how these theories and suppositions have been substantiated. In the author’s view it may be concluded from this investigation not only that the arguments advanced by Morkot and James are inappropriate to substantiate the chronological reduction advocated by them, but also that on historical considerations their theory is untenable.

Affiliations: 1: Email: gebro@compaqnet.nl

10.1163/187416611X580705
/content/journals/10.1163/187416611x580705
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading

A recent proposition by R. Morkot and P. James to shorten the period from the start of the Twenty-second until the end of the Twenty-fifth Dynasty prompted the author to investigate what unquestionable chronological data we have, what are the theories and suppositions founded on those data and how these theories and suppositions have been substantiated. In the author’s view it may be concluded from this investigation not only that the arguments advanced by Morkot and James are inappropriate to substantiate the chronological reduction advocated by them, but also that on historical considerations their theory is untenable.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/18741657/v4n1_s2.html;jsessionid=oCRr9qfbgT2pdQS8qGLGrfyU.x-brill-live-03?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/187416611x580705&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/187416611x580705
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187416611x580705
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187416611x580705
2011-01-01
2016-12-05

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation