Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Hijab Debate in the Norwegian Press: Secular or Religious Arguments?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Religion in Europe

Do religious debaters challenge the secular public sphere? This article is an analysis of the largest religion related debate in Norway: the debate about the hijab and the use of religious symbols in the public sphere. The article is empirically founded on the debates in 2009 that began with the question about to which degree the hijab could become part of the Norwegian police uniform for those who would wish to use it. The analysis is mainly centred on the arguments of the hijab wearers: to what degree is their religious motivation translated into a secular language? The empirical examination will show that Muslim debaters arguments can be characterized by a striking absence of references to religious concepts, and a just as striking use of secular ones. The article suggests that the lack of religious argumentation is an expression of an Islamic secularism rather than a result of a translation process. The hijab wearer's arguments are presented in the light of John Rawls’ and Jürgen Habermas’ thoughts about the need for translation—and its price.

Affiliations: 1: Center for Studies of Holocaust and Religious Minorities Blindern, Norway


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. An-Naim A. A. (2008): Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Sharia, London: Harvard University Press.
2. Asad T. (1993): Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons for Power in Christianity and Islam, London: John Hopkins University Press.
3. Aftenposten (årgang 2004, 2009).
4. Bangstad S. (2009): Sekularismens ansikter, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
5. Barli A.H. (2009): Hijab I norsk offentlighet – en diskursanalyse,Masteroppgave i Religion og samfunn, Det teologiske fakultet ved Universitetet i Oslo.
6. Betz H.G., Meret S. (2009): “"Revisiting Lepanto: The Political Mobilization Against Islam in Contemporary Western-Europe"” I Patterns of Prejudice, Vol 43:3, 313334.
7. Borchgrevink T. (2007): “"The Hijab Debate and the Liberal Dilemma"” I Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning, nr. 2.
8. Casanova J. (1994): Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
9. Dagbladet (årgang 2004, 2009).
10. Dagsavisen (årgang 2004, 2009).
11. Esposito J. (1992): The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality?New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Esposito J. L, Mogahed D. (2007): Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think: Based on Gallup's World Poll, The Largest Study of its Kind, New York: Gallup Press.
13. Fritt Ord Foundation (Website): .
14. Habermas, J. (2005): “Religion in the Public Sphere” in the seminar report Religion in the Public Sphere, the Holberg prize Seminar 2005.
15. Habermas J. (2008): Between Naturalism and Religion, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. Hijabbrigaden (website): .
17. IMDI (Directorate of Integration and Diversity), Annual Report 2009: Immigrants in the Norwegian Media: Media Created Fear of Islam and Invisible Daily Life.” .
18. Jacobsen C. M. (2006): Staying on the Straight Path: Religious Identity Among Young Muslims in Norway, dissertation for dr. polit., University of Bergen.
19. Klassekampen (årgang 2004, 2009).
20. Klausen J. (2005): The Islamic Challenge: Politics and Religion in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Lewis B. (1993): Islam in History: Ideas, People, and Events in the Middle East, Chicago: Open Court.
22. Lewis B. og Buntzie E. C. (2009): Islam: The Religion and the People, Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Wharton School Pub.
23. Lindholm T. (2005): "“Challenging Habermas on the Moral Legitimacy of Religious Voices in Democratic Politics: Why Overlapping Justifications of Human Rights may Leave Secularist Worries Uncalled-For,” The Holberg Prize Seminar 2005", Religion in the Public Space.
24. Norsk Rikskringkasting, NRK Redaksjon 21.
25. Ramadan T. (2009): Europeisk islam: Å være muslim I vesten, Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
26. Rawls J. (1971): A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
27. Rawls J. (1993): Political Liberalism, Colombia: University Press.
28. Sicakkan H.G., Lihman Y.G. (2006): What Happens When a Society is Diverse? Exploring Multidimensional Identities,New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.
29. Retriever Research, A-tekst, Version 5.5.21 - Retriever AB -
30. Verdens Gang (VG) (årgang 2004, 2009).
31. Vårt Land (årgang 2004, 2009).
32. Weithman P. J. (2002): Religion and the Obligations of Citizenship, Cambridge: University Press.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of Religion in Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation