Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

De gildebrief van Rudolf II voor de schilders van Praag van 27 april I595 en zijn implicaties rondom het begrip kunst

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History

The privilege granted by Emperor Rudolf II to the painters' guild of Prague embodied not only a confirmation of the old privileges, but also comprised two passages seemingly elevating the status of the guild. First, the guild's coat of arms was to be embellished with precious stones in the crown and the female Moor crest figure replaced by Pallas Athena. And, second, it was stipulated that henceforth painting was to be referred to as an art rather than a craft. While the term 'artist' for painters and architects had been in use for some time, this emphatic formulation seemed to coincide with a tenacious pretension on the part of painters in general that painting ought to be ranked among the "liberal arts" (artes liberales). This conceit had potentially far-reaching consequences, namely that its practitioners would not be subject to guild regulations and thus exempt from membership. Although the new passage may have simply been meant to enhance the status of the guild members, it created unrest among the ranks. In particular the glaziers - with whom there had been friction previously - felt threatened by the new formulation, which might entail that the guild in the future would have to do without the substantial contributions from the painters. This concern engendered new disagreements, which eventually led to the suspension of the guild chairman Matyáš Hutsky who, however, was reinstated after a special agreement was reached between the painters and the glaziers. Those painters employed by the royal court continued to be excused from guild requirements, while membership remained mandatory for all other masters.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187501704x00368
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187501704x00368
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187501704x00368
2004-01-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Oud Holland - Quarterly for Dutch Art History — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation