Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Understanding the Mediator: Taking Stock of the OSCE’s Mechanisms and Instruments for Conflict Resolution

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Security and Human Rights
For more content, see Helsinki Monitor.

Mediation and dialogue facilitation are at the heart of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europes’s (OSCE) engagements, and have become widely recognised as being among the most effective means for the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts both, in terms of costs and results.1 The OSCE has however started with a different set of mechanisms to settle conflicts, such as the Valletta mechanism or the Conciliation Committee. This article examines these mechanisms and elaborates on the reasons why they have never been applied. It further describes the evolvement of new instruments, in particular, its mediation and dialogue facilitation capacities. Further, the OSCE has institutionalised an explicit mediation support capacity to provide adequate assistance, similar to the UN and the EU. Without a doubt, the OSCE can be clearly regarded as a mediator. The article presents the OSCE’s different roles of being a mediator and its struggle for principles like inclusivity and efficiency, or impartiality and neutrality. The stocktaking of mechanisms and instruments and the OSCE’s role as a mediator concludes with the Organization’s weaknesses and strengths, and respective recommendations for further development.

Affiliations: 1: Mediation Support Officer, OSCE Conflict Prevention Centre, Vienna

10.1163/18750230-02703011
/content/journals/10.1163/18750230-02703011
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18750230-02703011
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18750230-02703011
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18750230-02703011
2016-09-09
2018-09-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Security and Human Rights — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation