Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Transregional Military Dimensions of Civilian Protection: A Two-Part Problem with a Two-Part Solution

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The utilization of peacekeepers to protect civilians confronting devastation remains an issue of considerable debate about whether sufficient capacity exists to take on the task. This paper examines the difficulties of providing resources both for quick response civilian protection against ongoing devastation and follow-on longer-term activities that can help guarantee against a resurgence of violence. Research drawing on the CPASS database of worldwide peacekeeping operations reveals two clusters of troop contributing countries: a UN set and a cross-cutting “Western” agendas group. The fist cluster has demonstrated a willingness to deploy to long-term multidimensional peacekeeping missions that can help dampen the prospects of resurgence, and the second group (plus one important idiosyncratic actor) has demonstrated a willingness to take on usually shorter but more dangerous peace enforcement missions. For the foreseeable future, the most promising prospect for the protection of civilians involves the two clusters operating either in parallel or in sequence. While this division of labor may not be the most efficient way of doing business in an ideal world, it is the best we can expect for the world in which we live.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Ethics and International Aff airs 08926794 2005; 31
2. Foreign Aff airs 00157120 Vol 81: 99
3. Ethics and International Aff airs 08926794 2008; Vol 22: 309
4. International Peacekeeping 1380748x 2008; Vol 15: 84
5. Journal of Peace Research 00223433 2009; Vol 46: 219
6. International Studies Perspective 15283577 Vol 9: 183
7. Defense & Security Analysis 14751798 2008; 267
8. Journal of Peace Research 00223433 2009; 39
9. International Relations of the Asia-Pacifi c 1470482x 2007; Vol 7: 179
10. Journal of Confl ict Resolution 00220027 2009; 827
11. Survival 03007944 2004; Vol 46: 163
12. Review of International Studies 02602105 2005; Vol 31: 209

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Journal of International Peacekeeping — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation