Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

What does the Form Ðrowian in the Taunton Fragment Stand For?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik

The Taunton Fragment is an eleventh-century bilingual (Latin-Old English) collection of expositions of gospel pericopes. In addition to contributing to understanding of pastoral care in Anglo-Saxon England, it provides invaluable information about linguistic innovations that take place during the transition period from Late Old to Early Middle English. The present article focuses on one such development—the form ðrowian. Taken at its face value, that is, as a II class weak verb meaning ‘to suffer; torment’, it causes discrepancy between the syntactic structure and the lexical meaning in the Old English text, on the one hand, and lack of correspondence between the Latin and Old English rendition, on the other. A close examination of this form in the Old English corpus suggests that it might be the earliest recorded example of the verb throw in the sense ‘to hurl’. The present article proposes that this semantic development originates in the glosses and Latin-influenced texts. Among the major causes of this innovation are polysemy and homonymy resulting from phonological and morphological changes as well as linguistic creativity of the Anglo-Saxon translators, glossators, and scribes.

Affiliations: 1: Department of English Language and Literature, University of Waterloo Waterloo Canada eafros@uwaterloo.ca

10.1163/18756719-12340001
/content/journals/10.1163/18756719-12340001
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18756719-12340001
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Afros Elena "“Some Morphological, Lexical, and Syntactic Features of the English Text of the Taunton Fragment”" Notes and Queries 2015a Vol 62 12 16 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gju218
2. Afros Elena "“Agreement within the Noun Phrase in the Taunton Fragment”" Notes and Queries 2015b Vol 62 199 203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gjv016
3. Ayto J. Word Origins: The Secret Histories of English Words from A to Z 2005 2nd edn London
4. Bosworth-Toller Toller T. N. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary: Based on the Manuscript Collections of the Late Joseph Bosworth 1882–1898 Oxford J. Bosworth and T. N. Toller
5. Cameron , et al Cameron A. , Amos A. C. , Healey A. diP. , et al Dictionary of Old English: A to G Online 2007 Toronto <>
6. Campbell Alistair Old English Grammar 1959 Oxford
7. Clemoes P. A. M. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The First Series, Text 1997 Oxford (eets s.s. 17)
8. Conti Aidan Kleist Aaron J. "“The Circulation of the Old English Homily in the Twelfth Century: New Evidence from Oxford, Bodleian Library, ms Bodley 343”" The Old English Homily: Precedent, Practice, and Appropriation 2007 Turnhout 365 402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/M.SEM-EB.3.3784
9. Conti Aidan "“The Taunton Fragment and the Homiliary of Angers: Context for New Old English”" The Review of English Studies 2009 Vol 60 1 33 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/res/hgn073
10. Denison D. English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions 1993 New York
11. Étaix Raymond "“l’Homelairie carolingien d’Angers”" Revue Bénédictine 1994 Vol 10 148 190
12. Fischer Olga "“The Origin and Spread of the Accusative and Infinitive Construction in English”" Folia Linguistica Historica 1989 Vol 8 143 217
13. Fischer Olga Gerritsen Marinel , Stein Dieter "“Syntactic Change and Borrowing: The Case of the Accusative-and-Infinitive Construction in English”" Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change 1992 Berlin 17 88
14. Fischer , et al The Syntax of Early English 2000 Cambridge O. Fischer, A. van Kemenade, W. Koopman & W. van der Wurff
15. Gneuss Helmut "“The Homiliary of the Taunton Fragments”" Notes and Queries 2005 Vol 52 440 442 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/notesj/gji403
16. Godden M. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: The Second Series, Text 1979 Oxford (eets s.s. 5)
17. Godden M. Ælfric’s Catholic Homilies: Introduction, Commentary and Glossary 2000 Oxford (eets s.s. 18)
18. Gretsch Mechthild "“The Taunton Fragment: A New Text from Anglo-Saxon England”" Anglo-Saxon England 2004 Vol 33 145 193 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263675104000067
19. Harney E. M. The Sexualized and Gendered Tortures of Virgin Martyrs in Medieval English Literature 2008 PhD Thesis, University of Toronto
20. Healey , et al Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus 2009 Toronto A. diP. Healey, J. P. Wilkin & Xin Xiang <>
21. Irvine S. Old English Homilies from ms Bodley 343 1993 Oxford (eets, o.s. 302)
22. Irvine S. Irvine S. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition. Volume 7: ms e 2004 Cambridge
23. Lass Roger Blake Norman "“Phonology and Morphology”" The Cambridge History of the English Language, ii: 1066–1476 1992 Cambridge 23 156
24. Liuzza R. M. The Old English Version of the Gospels, ii: Notes and Glossary 2000 New York eets, o.s. 314
25. Meritt H. D. Some of the Hardest Glosses in Old English 1968 Hague
26. Middle English Dictionary: Middle English Dictionary <>
27. Moore Samuel "“Earliest Morphological Changes in Middle English”" Language 1928 Vol 4 238 266 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/409140
28. Morris R. Old English Homilies and Homiletic Treatises of the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries 1868 Vol 2 vols London (eets o.s. 29, 34)
29. Napier Arthur S. "“Contributions to Old English Lexicography”" Transactions of the Philological Society 1906 Vol 25 265 335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.1906.tb00150.x
30. Rudolf Winfried "“The Homiliary of Angers in Tenth-century England”" Anglo-Saxon England 2010 Vol 39 163 192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263675110000098
31. Skeat W. W. The Holy Gospels in Anglo-Saxon, Northumbrian, and Old Mercian Versions, Synoptically Arranged, with Collations Exhibiting All the Readings of All the mss, Together with the Early Latin Version as Contained in the Lindisfarne ms, Collated with the Latin Version in the Rushworth ms 1871–1887 Cambridge
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18756719-12340001
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18756719-12340001
2016-04-04
2018-09-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation