Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

What Motivates Fregean Anti-Individualism?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Grazer Philosophische Studien

In Anti-Individualism and Knowledge Jessica Brown criticises views of content that combine Fregean Sense and anti-individualism. Brown assumes that all Fregean theories are motivated by a picture of the rational thinker as someone who will always have transparent access to the simple inferential consequences of his thoughts. This picture, Brown argues, is incompatible with anti-individualism about content. While traditional Fregean theories have indeed had such motivation, Brown’s mistake is in attributing this motivation to the modern Fregean anti-individualist. My goal in this paper is to bring to light a different, and seldom discussed, motivation for Fregean views of content which is immune to Browns objections.

Affiliations: 1: Independent researcher, University of Copenhagen,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Brewer Bill 2011. Perception and its Objects . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Brown Jessica 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge . Cambridge, Mass: mit Press.
3. Burge Tyler 1977/2007. “"Belief De Re – with Postscript."” In Foundations of Mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4481.
4. Burge Tyler 1979. “"Anti-Individualism and the Mental".” Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol 4, 73121.
5. Burge Tyler, 2009. “"Five Theses on De Re States and Attitudes."” In The Philosophy of David Kaplan . Edited by Almog Joseph, and Leonardi Paolo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 246316.
6. Boghossian Paul 1994. “"The Transparency of Mental Content".” Philosophical Perspectives Vol 8, 3350.
7. Campbell John 1987. “"Is Sense Transparent".” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Vol 61, 273292.
8. Campbell John, 2007. “"If Truth is Dethroned what Role Is Left for It?"” In: Library of Living Philosophers: The Philosophy of Michael Dummett . Edited by Auxier Randall E., and Hahn Lewis Edwin. Chicago: Open Court Press, 281300.
9. Campbell John 2002. Reference and Consciousness . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Dummett Michael 1975. "“Frege’s Distinction between Sense and Reference.”" In: Truth and other Enigmas . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 116144.
11. Dummett Michael 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language . London: Duckworth.
12. Dummett Michael 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics . London: Duckworth.
13. Evans Gareth 1982. The Varieties of Reference . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Fine Kit 2007. Semantic Relationism . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
15. Frege Gottlob, 1892. “"On Sense and Reference".” In: Philosophical Writings . Edited by Geach Peter, and Black Max. Oxford: Blackwell.
16. McDowell John 1986. "“Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.”" In: Meaning Knowledge and Reality . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 228259.
17. McDowell John 1996. Mind and World . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
18. Putnam Hillary 1975. “"The Meaning of “Meaning".” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol 7, 131193.
19. Recanati Francois 2012. Mental Files . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Schellenberg Susanna 2011. “"Perceptual Content Defended".” Noûs Vol 45, 714750.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Grazer Philosophische Studien — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation