Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Physicalism as a Research Programme

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Grazer Philosophische Studien

It is argued in this paper that physicalism is best understood as a research programme, rather than a thesis or an attitude, as some philosophers argue. Given that research programmes connect past, present and future philosophical or scientific activities, physicalists need not decide between current and future physical theories, as it has been required by Hempel’s Dilemma. The author contrasts this proposal with other solutions to Hempel’s Dilemma proposed by currentists, futurists, and those philosophers who claim that physicalism should best be understood as an attitude, arguing that understanding physicalism as a research programme avoids problems that are present in the alternative views, and that it matches well with the standard classifications in the history of philosophy.

Affiliations: 1: University of Belgrade,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Bokulich Peter 2011. “"Hempel’s Dilemma and Domains of Physics".” Analysis Vol 71, 646651.
2. Bourget David, & David Chalmers, 2014. “"What Do Philosophers Believe?"” Philosophical Studies Vol 170, 465500.
3. Carnap Rudolf, 1959. "“Psychology in Physical Language.”" In: Logical Positivism , edited by Ayer Alfred, New York: The Free Press, 165198.
4. Chalmers David 1996. The Conscious Mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chalmers David, 2010. "“The Two-Dimensional Argument against Materialism.”" In: The Character of Consciousness , edited by Chalmers David, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141205.
6. Chalmers David 2011. “"Verbal Disputes".” The Philosophical Review Vol 120, 515566.
7. Churchland Patricia. 1986. Neurophilosophy . Cambridge ma: mit Press.
8. Churchland Paul 1996. “"The Rediscovery of the Light".” The Journal of Philosophy Vol 93, 211228.
9. Crane Tim, & Hugh Mellor 1990. “"There Is No Question of Physicalism".” Mind Vol 99, 185206.
10. Crane Tim, 2014. "“Intentional Objects.”" In: Aspects of Psychologism , edited by Crane Tim, Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 111123.
11. Dennett Daniel 1991. Consciousness Explained . Boston: Little, Brown and Co.
12. Descartes René, 1985. "“The World or Treatise on Light.”" In: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (vol. i), edited by Cottingham John,, Stoothoff Robert, & Murdoch Dugald, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8198.
13. Diaz-Leon Esa 2008. “"Defending the Phenomenal Concept Strategy".” Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol 86, 597610.
14. Dowell Janice 2006. “"The Physical: Empirical, Not Metaphysical".” Philosophical Studies Vol 131, 2560.
15. Garber Daniel 1983. “"Mind, Body, and the Laws of Nature in Descartes and Leibniz".” Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol 8, 105133.
16. Gillett Carl, & Gene Witmer 2001. “"A ‘Physical’ Need: Physicalism and the via negativa".” Analysis Vol 61, 302309.
17. Greene Brian 2004. The Fabric of the Cosmos . New York: Vintage.
18. Hameroff Stewart, & Roger Penrose 1996. “"Conscious Events as Orchestrated Space-Time Selections".” Journal of Consciousness Studies Vol 31, 3653.
19. Hempel Carl 1980. “"Comments on Goodman’s Ways of Worldmaking".” Synthese Vol 45, 193200.
20. Johnston Mark 1992. “"Constitution Is Not Identity".” Mind Vol 101, 89105.
21. Judisch Neal 2008. “"Why ‘Non-mental’ Won’t Work: on Hempel’s Dilemma and the Characterization of the ‘Physical’".” Philosophical Studies Vol 140, 299318.
22. Kirk Robert 2006. “"Physicalism and Strict Implication".” Synthese Vol 151, 523536.
23. Kuhn Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
24. Kuhn Thomas, 1970. "“Reflections on My Critics”". In: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge , edited by Lakatos Imre, & Musgrave Alan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231278.
25. Lakatos Imre, 1978. "“Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.”" In: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers (vol. i), edited by Worrall John, & Currie Gregory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8102.
26. Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm, 1997. "“[First] Explanation of the New System of the Communication between Substances, in Reply to What Was Said of It in the Journal for 12 September 1695.”" In: Leibniz’s ‘New System’ and Associated Contemporary Texts , edited by Woolhouse Roger, & Francks Richard, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 4752.
27. Maudlin Tim 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time . Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
28. Melnyk Andrew 1997. “"How to Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism".” The Journal of Philosophy Vol 94, 622637.
29. Montero Barbara 1999. “"The Body Problem".” Nous Vol 33, 183200.
30. Montero Barbara, 2003. “Varieties of Causal Closure”. In: Physicalism and Mental Causation , edited by Walter Sven, & Heckmann Heinz-Dieter, Imprint Academic, 173187.
31. Neurath Otto, 1983. “"Physicalism: The Philosophy of the Viennese Circle".” In: Otto Neurath: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946 , edited by Cohen Robert, & Neurath Marie, Dordrecht: Reidel, 4851.
32. Ney Alyssa 2008a. “"Defining Physicalism".” Philosophy Compass Vol 3/5, 10331048.
33. Ney Alyssa 2008b “"Physicalism as an Attitude".” Philosophical Studies Vol 138, 115.
34. Papineau David, 2001. "“The Raise of Physicalism”". In: Physicalism and Its Discontents , edited by Gillett Carl, & Loewer Barry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 336.
35. Smart John 1959. “"Sensations and Brain Processes".” The Philosophical Review Vol 68, 141156.
36. van Fraassen Bas 2002. The Empirical Stance . New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
37. Weinert Friedel 2009. Copernicus, Darwin & Freud: Revolutions in the History and Philosophy of Science . Chichester: Blackwell.
38. Wilson Jessica 2006. “"On Characterizing the Physical".” Philosophical Studies Vol 131, 6199.
39. Wittgenstein Ludwig 1958. Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
40. Woolhouse Roger 1985. “"Leibniz’s Reaction to Cartesian Interaction".” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Vol 86, 6982.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Grazer Philosophische Studien — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation