Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Reconsidering Richard Shusterman’s Somaesthetics

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The Confucian Debate between Mèng Zǐ and Xún Zǐ

image of Contemporary Pragmatism

In his work on somaesthetics, Richard Shusterman employs Confucianism’s take on ritualized self-cultivation to address blind spots in Euro-American accounts. However, Shusterman’s remarks on the later classical-era thinker Xún Zǐ (荀子) hint at a possible tension with the former’s pragmatism and promotion of somatic self-fashioning. The classical Confucian debate between Mencius (Mèng Zǐ; 孟子) and Xún Zǐ on human nature being either “good” or “bad” broaches issues of somaesthetics, namely as concerns self-cultivation being either internally spontaneous or externally imposed. Looking at this debate can thus help the project of somaesthetics by bringing old, though in this case novel, vocabulary to bear on an issue with which Shusterman wrestles – the “ontic” status of somaesthetic practice.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Austria, james.garrison@univie.ac.at

10.1163/18758185-01201008
/content/journals/10.1163/18758185-01201008
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18758185-01201008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ames Roger T. , and Rosemont, Jr., Henry, eds. The Analects of Confucius . 1998. New York: Ballantine Books.
2. Birdwhistell Joanne D. 2007. Mencius and Masculinities: Dynamics of Power, Morality, and Maternal Thinking . Albany: State University of New York.
3. Butler Judith . 1997. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
4. Chung-Ying Cheng . 2002. “ "On the Metaphysical Significance of Ti(Body-Embodiment) in Chinese Philosophy: Benti(Origin-Substance) and Ti-Yong(Substance and Function)".” Journal of Chinese Philosophy Vol 29( 2): 145161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-6253.00074
5. Zhèn Dài (戴震). 1982. 孟子字義疏證 . Beijing: 中華書局.
6. Derrida Jacques . 1975. Marges de la Philosophie . Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
7. Goldin Paul R. 2007. “ "Xunzi and Early Han Philosophy".” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies Vol 67( 1): 135166.
8. Hall David L. ,and Ames Roger . 1987. Thinking Through Confucius . Albany: State University of New York.
9. Hobbes Thomas . Leviathan . Ed. Richard Tuck. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press1996.
10. Jones Susan , ed.. 1985. The New Jerusalem Bible . New York: Doubleday.
11. Knoblock John ,& Júe Zhāng , tr. Xunzi (2 vols.). Changsha: Hunan People’s Publishing House, 1999.
12. Zéhòu (李泽厚). 2001. 华夏美学 . Guilin, China: Guangxi Normal University Press.
13. ———. 美学四讲 . Beijing: 三联书店, 1989.
14. ———. 1999. “ "Subjectivity and ‘Subjectality’: A Response".” Philosophy East and West Vol 49( 2): 174183. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1400201
15. Marx Karl ,and Engels Friedrich . 1956. Werke . Vol. 40. Berlin: Dietz.
16. Shusterman Richard . 2008. Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics . New York: Cambridge.
17. ———. 2004. “ "Pragmatism and East-Asian Thought".” Metaphilosophy Vol 35( 1–2): 1343.
18. ———. “ "Somaesthetics and the Utopian Body",” in International Yearbook of Aesthetics: Volume 14, 2010 , ed. Wang Keping. ( Beijing: International Association for Aesthetics) pp. 8294.
19. ———. “ "Somatic Style".” 2011. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism Vol 69( 2): 147159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2011.01457.x
20. ———. 2012. Thinking Through the Body: Essays in Somaesthetics . New York: Cambridge.
21. Sor-Hoon Tan . 2004. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction . Albany: State University of New York.
22. Wáng Yúnwǔ (王雲五), ed. 1974. 孟子今註今譯 . Taipei: 臺灣商務印書館.
23. Yán Líng Fēng (嚴靈峯), ed. 1995. 墨子簡編 . Taipei: 臺灣商務印書館.
24. Zhū (朱熹). 1998. 朱子语类选注 . Vol. 1. Guilin: 广西师笵大学出版社.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18758185-01201008
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18758185-01201008
2015-06-16
2017-11-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Contemporary Pragmatism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation