Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Rorty’s Promise in Metaethics

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Contemporary Pragmatism

Little attention is given to Richard Rorty’s metaethical views. No doubt this stems from the fact that most commentators are more interested in his metaphilosophical views; most see his metaethical views, offered in scattered passages, as just the downstream runoff from higher-level reflection. This article considers Rorty’s metaethics on their own merits, quite apart from whether his global picture works. I ultimately argue that Rorty’s metaethical outlook is attractive but beset by internal difficulties. Specifically, I contend that Rorty does not and cannot remain faithful to the methodological approach to metaethics for which he advocates. At the paper’s close, I gesture at a nearby methodological approach that best approximates Rorty’s metaethical methodology.

Affiliations: 1: Paul M. Hebert Law Center and Department of Philosophy & Religious Studies, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Boyd Richard,. “"How to be a Moral Realist".” In Essays on Moral Realism , edited by Sayre-McCord Geoffrey, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1988.
2. Dworkin Ronald. “"Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe It".” Philosophy & Public Affairs Vol 25 (1996): 87139.
3. Enoch David. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
4. Goldman Alvin,. “"What Is Justified Belief?”" In Justification and Knowledge , edited by Pappas George, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.
5. Hare R.M.‘Ought’ and Imperatives.” The Language of Morals . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1952.
6. Mackie J.L. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong . New York: Penguin, 1977.
7. Putnam Hilary. Ethics Without Ontology . Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press, 2004.
8. Railton Peter. “"Moral Realism".” The Philosophical Review Vol 95 (1986): 163–207.
9. Rorty Richard. “"Introduction",” Consequences of Pragmatism . Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1982.
10. Rorty Richard. “"Introduction",” Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
11. Rorty Richard. “"Pragmatism as Anti-authoritarianism".” Revue Internationale de Philosophie Vol 53 (1999): 720.
12. Rorty Richard. “"Pragmatism, Relativism, Irrationalism".” Consequences of Pragmatism . Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1982.
13. Rorty Richard. “"Solidarity or Objectivity".” Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
14. Scanlon T.M. Being Realistic about Reasons . Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
15. Sturgeon Nicolas,. “"Moral Explanations".” In Morality, Reason, and Truth: New Essays on the Foundations of Ethics , edited by Copp David, and Zimmerman David. Lanham, md: Rowman and Littlefield, 1985.
16. Worsnip Alex. “"Explanatory Indispensability and Deliberative Indispensability: Against Enoch’s Analogy."” Thought: A Journal of Philosophy (2016), accessed November 26, 2016, doi:10.1002/tht3.220.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Contemporary Pragmatism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation