Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

On the Nature of Belief in Pluralistic Ignorance

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Contemporary Pragmatism

I apply recent research on the links between belief, truth and pragmatism based on Williams (1970) statement that “beliefs aim at truth,” to the phenomenon of pluralistic ignorance, in which agents act contrary to their private beliefs because they believe that other agents believe the contrary. I consider three positions; an epistemic position, a pragmatic position, and a third position coordinating the first two. I apply them to pluralistic ignorance while considering the recent study of Bjerring, Hansend and Pedersen (2014). I conclude that a purely epistemic approach is better for understanding pluralistic ignorance.

Affiliations: 1: Departamento de Lógica, Historia y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Bicchieri Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bjerring Jens,, Hansen Jens, and Pedersen Nicolaj. 2014. “"On the Rationality of Pluralistic Ignorance"” in Synthese , Vol 191(11), pp. 24452470.
3. Boon Susan,, Watkins Sarah, and Sciban Rowan. 2014. “"Pluralistic Ignorance and Misperception of Social Norms Concerning Cheating in Dating Relationships"” in Personal Relationships , Vol 21(3), pp. 482496.
4. Brennan Geoffrey,, Eriksson Lina,, Goodin Robert, and Southwood Nicholas. 2013. Explaining Norms . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Chan Timothy. (ed.). 2013. The Aim of Belief . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Davidson Donald. 1974. “"Belief and the Basis of Meaning"” in Synthese , Vol 27(3–4), pp. 309323.
7. Davidson Donald. 1990. “"The Structure and Content of Truth"” in The Journal of Philosophy , Vol 87(6), pp. 279328.
8. Davidson Donald. 1996. “"The Folly of Trying to Define Truth"” in The Journal of Philosophy , Vol 93(6), pp. 263278.
9. Davidson Donald,. 2000. “"Truth Rehabilitated"” in Truth, Language and History , ed. Davidson Donald (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 318.
10. Engel Pascal. 2013a. “"Belief and the Right Kind of Reason"” in Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía , Vol 32(3), pp. 1934.
11. Engel Pascal,. 2013b. “"In Defense of Normativism About the Aim of Belief"” in The Aim of Belief , ed. Chan Timothy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 4385.
12. Gibbons John. 2013. The Norm of Belief . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Gibbons John,. 2014. “"Knowledge versus Truth"” in Epistemic Norms: New Essays on Action, Belief and Assertion , ed. Littlejohn Clayton, and Turri John (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
14. Haack Susan. 1996. “"Concern for Truth: what it Means, why it Matters"” in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences , Vol 775(1), pp. 5763.
15. Halbesleben Jonathon, and Buckley Ronald. 2004. “"Pluralistic Ignorance: Historical Development and Organizational Applications"” in Management Decision , Vol 42(1), pp. 126138.
16. Hendricks Vincent. 2010. “"Knowledge Transmissibility and Pluralistic Ignorance: A First Stab"” in Metaphilosophy ,Vol 41(3), pp. 279291.
17. Katz Danield, and Allport Floyd. 1931. “"Students’ Attitudes"” in Syracuse . Cleveland: Craftsman.
18. Owens David. 2013. “"Value and Epistemic Normativity"” in Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía , Vol 32(3), pp. 3558.
19. Papineau David,. 2013. “"There Are No Norms of Belief"” in The Aim of Belief , ed. Chan Timothy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 6479.
20. Prentice Deborah, and Miller Dale. 1993. “"Pluralistic Ignorance and Alcohol Use on Campus: Some Consequences of Misperceiving the Social Norm"” in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol 64(2), pp. 24356.
21. Proietti Carlo, and Olsson Erik. 2014. “"A ddl Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief"” in Journal of Philosophical Logic ,Vol 43(2–3), pp. 499515.
22. Rorty Richard. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers (Vol. Vol 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Rorty Richard. 1996. “"Something to Steer by"” [Review of the book John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism by A. Ryan] in London Review of Books , Vol 18(12).
24. Rorty Richard. 1998. Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers (Vol. Vol 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Rorty Richard,. 2000a. “"Universality and Truth"” in Rorty and his Critics , ed. Brandom Robert (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 130.
26. Rorty Richard,. 2000b. “"Response to Donald Davidson"” in Rorty and his Critics , ed. Brandom Robert (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 7480.
27. Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía . 2013. Vol 32(3). Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo. issn: 0210–1602.
28. Unwin Nicholas. 2007. Aiming at Truth . London: Palgrave MacMillan.
29. Williams Bernard. 1970. Problems of the Self . Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
30. Whiting Daniel. 2010. “"Should I Believe the Truth?"” in Dialectica , Vol 64(2), pp. 213224.
31. Whiting Daniel. 2013a. “"Truth: the Aim and Norm of Belief"” in Teorema: Revista internacional de filosofía , Vol 32(3), 121135.
32. Whiting Daniel,. 2013b. “"Nothing but the Truth: On the Norms and Aims of Belief"” in The Aim of Belief , ed. Chan Timothy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 184203.
33. Whiting Daniel,. 2014. “"Reasons for Belief, Reasons for Action, the Aim of Belief, and the Aim of Action"” in Epistemic Norms New Essays on Action, Belief, and Assertion , ed. Littlejohn Clayton, and Turri John (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 219238.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Contemporary Pragmatism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation