Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Phylogenetic review of desert firefly taxonomic characters (Coleoptera: Lampyridae: Microphotus)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Insect Systematics & Evolution

Species are often difficult to discern when morphological attributes do not reflect taxonomic boundaries. Cladistic analysis using individuals as OTUs allows for morphological attributes to be determined as either taxonomic characters or traits. This approach is used to review 16 taxonomic attributes that define Microphotus species. In addition, mitochondrial cyctochrome oxidase I and luciferase DNA data are analyzed for phylogenetic signal and for the potential use for species diagnosis. Analysis of morphological attributes for 317 Microphotus individuals yielded 5000 trees with poor resolution. Individuals of each species where not monophyletic thus failing to reject the hypothesis that the 16 taxonomic attributes are traits, hence they are not taxonomic characters. Separate cladistic analyses of mitochondrial COI and luciferase gene data for ten and seven OTUs, respectively, each produced one parsimonious tree. Topologies of these trees were incongruent by the placement of M. chiricahuae, M. pecosensis, and M. fragilis. Cladistic analysis of all data for 11 OTUs produced two equally parsimonious trees which were unresolved for two nodes. All data sets supported the trees, however, the luciferase data showed the most conflict with the other data sets. The data support the synonymy of M. decarthrus Fall 1912 and M. fragilis Oliver 1912 based on lack of morphological variation and geographic and temporal proximity of collection localities. Additional data is needed to make a more robust statement of Microphotus phylogeny and taxonomy.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187631206788831506
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187631206788831506
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187631206788831506
2006-01-01
2016-12-03

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Insect Systematics & Evolution — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation