Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Re-evaluation of taxonomic utility of male phallic complex in higher-level classification of Acridomorpha (Orthoptera: Caelifera)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Insect Systematics & Evolution

The current higher classification of the orthopteran superfamily group Acridomorpha is largely based on interpretation of male phallic structures. Internal male genitalia have been considered as an excellent taxonomic character because of a widespread belief that they are less subject to selective pressures from environment, and thus more stable than external characters. Furthermore, based on a notion that evolution proceeds from simple to complex, early taxonomists who shaped the higher classification of Acridomorpha considered those groups with less differentiated and membranous phallic structures as primitive and used this notion to deduce a phylogeny of Acridomorpha. In this study, we test these ideas based on a cladistic analysis of male phallic structures and a character optimization analysis to assess the level of homoplasy and synapomorphy for those phallic characters that have been traditionally used for the Acridomorpha systematics. We also perform an independent test of the phylogenetic utility of male phallic structures based on a molecular phylogeny. We show that while some phallic structures have strong phylogenetic signal, many traditionally used characters are highly homoplasious. However, even those homoplasious characters are often informative in inferring relationships. Finally, we argue that the notion that evolution proceeds in increasing complexity is largely unfounded and difficult to quantify in the higher-level classification of Acridomorpha.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4000 Central Florida Boulevard Orlando, FL 32816, USA

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1876312x-04402008
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Arnqvist G. ( 2004) "Sexual conflict and sexual selection: lost in the chase". Evolution Vol 58: 13831388. [Crossref]
2. Eberhard W.G. ( 1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia . Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Eberhard W.G. ( 2005) "Evolutionary conflicts of interest: are female sexual decisions different?" The American Naturalist Vol 165(Supplement): S19S25.
4. Hennig W. ( 1950) Grundzüge einer Theorie der phylogenetischen Systematik . Deutscher Zentralverlag. Berlin.
5. Hennig W. ( 1966) Phylogenetic Systematics . University of Illinois Press. Urbana, IL.
6. Hosken D.J. ,& Stockley P. ( 2004) "Sexual selection and genital evolution". Trends in Ecology & Evolution Vol 19: 8793. [Crossref]
7. Rowe L. ,& Arnqvist G. ( 2011) "Sexual selection and the evolution of genital shape and complexity in water striders". Evolution Vol 66: 4054.
8. Scudder G.G.E. ( 1971) "Comparative morphology of insect genitalia". Annual Review of Entomology Vol 15: 379406.
9. Song H. ,& Bucheli S.R. ( 2010) "Comparison of phylogenetic signal between male genitalia and non-genital characters in insect systematics". Cladistics Vol 26: 2335. [Crossref]
10. Tuxen S.L. (Ed.) ( 1970) Taxonomist’s glossary of genitalia in insects , second edn. Scandinavian University Press, Copenhagen.
11. Wheeler Q.D. ,, Assis L. ,& Rieppel O. ( 2013) "Heed the father of cladistics". Nature Vol 496: 295296. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1876312x-04402008
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1876312x-04402008
2013-01-01
2017-06-28

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Insect Systematics & Evolution — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation