Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Does Electoral Manipulation Vary?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Examining the Conditions for Instrumental and Informational Manipulation in Post-Soviet Elections

image of The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review

Electoral manipulation is committed both during hotly contested elections as well as quite predictable ones. Comparative scholarship has sought to understand this variation, acknowledging that electoral manipulation can serve an informational as well as an instrumental role, but has not distinguished when, if ever, electoral manipulation is more likely to serve one role over another. This paper examines these issues, asking if and how strategies of manipulation differ depending on the conditions of the election. Using a newly developed measure of contestation and original data on elections from ten post-Soviet states, this paper quantitatively analyzes the types of strategies used depending on election-level factors. The results reveal that incumbents are likely to select some, but not all, types of manipulation depending on contestation of the election, the level of incumbent dominance, and the type of election being held. This paper concludes that while electoral manipulation can be used for instrumental and informational purposes, they are likely to be pursued in different elections, and that this depends on the conditions of the elections.

Affiliations: 1: Ph.D.; University of Arizona (As of Fall 2017, University of North Georgia) hauser@email.arizona.edu

10.1163/18763324-20171250
/content/journals/10.1163/18763324-20171250
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763324-20171250
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ambrosio Thomas. (2014) “"Beyond the transition paradigm: a research agenda for authoritarian consolidation".” Demokratizatsiya , vol. Vol 22, no. 3: pp. 471494.
2. Argersinger Peter H. (1985) "New perspectives on election fraud in the gilded age". Political Science Quarterly Vol 100, (4): 669687.
3. Bader Max. (2014) “"Democracy Promotion and Authoritarian Diffusion: The Foreign Origins of Post-Soviet Election Laws”". Europe-Asia Studies.Vol 66(8):13501370.
4. Birch Sarah. (2011a) Electoral Malpractice . (Oxford, uk: Oxford University Press).
5. Birch Sarah. (2011b) “"Post-Soviet Electoral Practices in Comparative Perspective"”. Europe-Asia Studies . Vol 63(4): 703725.
6. Brancoti Dawn. (2014) “"Democratic Authoritarianism: Origins and Effects”". Annual Review of Political Science.Vol 17: 31326.
7. Boix Carles,, and Svolik Milan W.. (2013) “"The Foundations of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment, and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships"”. The Journal of Politics. Vol 75 (02): 300316.
8. Boyko Nazar, and Herron Erik S.. (2015) “"The effects of technical parties and partisan election management bodies on voting outcomes”". Electoral Studies Vol 40: 2333.
9. Bratton Michael,, and Van de Walle. Nicolas (1997) Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective . (New York, ny, usa; Cambridge, u.k: Cambridge University Press).
10. Brownlee Jason. (2007) Authoritarianism in an age of democratization . (Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press).
11. Brownlee Jason. (2009) "Portents of pluralism: How hybrid regimes affect democratic transitions". American Journal of Political Science Vol 53, (3): 515532.
12. de Mesquita Bueno,, Bruce. (2003) The logic of political survival . (Cambridge, Mass: mit Press).
13. Bunce Valerie. (2000) “"Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations”". Comparative Politics Studies.Vol 33(6/7): 703734.
14. Bunce Valerie,, and Wolchik Sharon L.. (2011) Defeating authoritarian leaders in postcommunist countries . (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
15. Dahl Robert A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition . (New Haven, ct: Yale University Press).
16. Donno Daniela. (2013) “"Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes"”. American Journal of Political Science .Vol 57 (3): 703716.
17. Donno Daniela,, and Roussias Nasos. (2012) “"Does cheating pay? The effect of electoral misconduct on party systems”". Comparative Political Studies Vol 45 (5): 575605.
18. Frantz E.,, and Kendall-Taylor A.. (2014) “"A dictator’s toolkit: Understanding how co-optation affects repression in autocracies”". Journal of Peace Research Vol 51 (3): 33246.
19. Friedman Edward,, and Wong Joseph. (eds.) (2008) Political transitions in dominant party systems: Learning to lose . (Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge).
20. Gasiorowski Mark J. (1995) “"Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis"”. The American Political Science Review. Vol 89 (4): 882.
21. Gandhi Jennifer. (2008) Political Institutions under Dictatorship . New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Gandhi Jennifer,, and Lust-Okar Ellen. (2009) “"Elections Under Authoritarianism"”. Annual Review of Political Science. Vol 12 (1).
23. Gandhi J.,, and Przeworski A.. (2007) "Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats". COMPARATIVEPOLITICALSTUDIESVol 40, (11): 12791301.
24. Gehlbach Scott, and Simpser Alberto. (2015) “"Electoral Manipulation as Bureaucratic Control".” American Journal of Political Science.Vol 59(1):212224.
25. Gilbert Leah,, and Mohseni Payam. (2011) “"Beyond Authoritarianism: The Conceptualization of Hybrid Regimes"”. Studies in Comparative International Development. Vol 46 (3): 270297.
26. Golosov Grigorii. (2013) “"Machine Politics: The Concept and Its Implications For Post-Soviet Studies”". Demokratizatsiya.Vol 21(4): 459480.
27. Goode J. Paul. (2010) “"Redefining Russia: Hybrid regimes, fieldwork, and Russian politics”". Perspectives on Politics Vol 8, (4): 10551075.
28. Greene Kenneth F. (2007) Why dominant parties lose: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective . Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Herron Erik S. (2009) Elections and democracy after communism? (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).
30. Herron Erik S. (2011a) “"Measuring Dissent in Electoral Authoritarian Societies: Lessons from Azerbaijan’s 2008 Presidential Election and 2009 Referendum"”. Comparative Political Studies Vol 44(11): 15571583.
31. Herron Erik S. (2011b) “"How Viktor Yanukovych Won: Reassessing the Dominant Narratives of Ukraine’s 2010 Presidential Election"” East European Politics and Societies Vol 25(1): 4767.
32. Hyde Susan D., (2009) “"How International Election Observers Detect and Deter Fraud"” in Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation . Ed. Alvarez Michael, Thad Hall and Susan Hyde Brookings Institution Press.
33. Hyde Susan D. (2011) The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma: Why election observation became an international norm . (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
34. Hyde Susan D.,, and Marinov Nikolay. (2012) “"Which elections can be lost?”" Political Analysis Vol 20, (2): 191210.
35. Jarabinsky Ivan. (2015) “"Appearances are deceptive: credibility of the Russian Election Commission”" East European Politics Vol 31(1): 88103.
36. Kelley Judith Green. (2012 ) Monitoring democracy: When international election observation works, and why it often fails . (Princeton, nj: Princeton University Press).
37. Kendall-Taylor Andrea. (2012) “"Purchasing power: Oil, elections and regime durability in Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan”". Europe-Asia Studies Vol 64 (4): 73760.
38. Konitzer Andrew. (2005) Voting For Russia’s Governors . (Baltimore, md. Johns Hopkins University Press).
39. Kuntz Philipp,, and Thompson Mark R.. (2009) “"More than just the final straw: Stolen elections as revolutionary triggers”". Comparative Politics Vol 41 (3): 25372.
40. Lassila Jussi. (2016) “"Aleksei Naval’nyi and Populist Re-ordering of Putin’s Stability”" Europe-Asia Studies Vol 68(1): 118137.
41. LaPorte Jody. (2015) “"Hidden in plain sight: Political opposition and hegemonic authoritarianism in Azerbaijan”". Post-Soviet Affairs Vol 31 (4): 33966.
42. Lehoucq Fabrice. (2003) “"Electoral fraud: Causes, types, and consequences”". Annual Review of Political Science Vol 6: 23356.
43. Levitsky Steven,, and Way Lucan. (2010) Competitive authoritarianism hybrid regimes after the Cold War . (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
44. Little Andrew. (2015) “"Fraud and Monitoring and Non-competitive Elections”". Political Science Research and Methods.Vol 3(1): 2141.
45. Little Andrew,, Tucker Joshua, and LaGatta Tom. (2015) “"Elections, Protest, and the Alteration of Power”". The Journal of Politics.Vol 77(4): 11421156.
46. Lukinova Evgeniya,, Myagkov Mikhail, and Ordeshook Peter C.. (2011) “"Metastasized Fraud in Russia’s 2008 Presidential Election”". Europe-Asia Studies Vol 63(4): 603621.
47. Lust-Okar Ellen. (2006) “"Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan"”. Democratization. Vol 13 (3): 456471.
48. Lust-Okar Ellen,. (2009) “"Legislative Elections in Hegemonic Authoritarian Regimes: Competitive Clientelism and Resistance to Democratization"” in Democratization by Elections . Ed. By Lindberg. Staffan (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp. 10127.
49. Magaloni Beatriz. (2006) Voting for autocracy: hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico . (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
50. Nyblade Benjamin,, and Reed Steven R.. (2008) "Who cheats? Who loots? Political competition and corruption in Japan, 1947–1993". American Journal of Political ScienceVol 52, (4): 926941.
51. Ohman Magnus. (2013) Political Finance Oversight Handbook . (International Foundations for Electoral Systems).
52. Pepinsky T. (2014) “"The institutional turn in comparative authoritarianism”". British Journal of Political Science Vol 44 (3): 63153.
53. Popova Maria. (2006) “"Watchdogs or attack dogs? The role of the Russian courts and the central election commission in the resolution of electoral disputes”". Europe-Asia Studies Vol 58(3): 391414.
54. Przeworski Adam. (1991) Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in eastern Europe and Latin America . (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press).
55. Rakner Lise, and van de Walle. Nicolas, (2009) “"Opposition Parties and Incumbent Presidents: The New Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Africa"”. in Democratization by Elections . Ed. By Lindberg Staffan (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp. 10127.
56. Reuter Ora. (2010) “"The politics of dominant party formation: United Russia and Russia’s Governors".” Europe-Asia Studies Vol 62, (2): 293327.
57. Reuter Ora John,, and Gandhi Jennifer. (2011) “"Economic Performance and Elite Defection from Hegemonic Parties"”. British Journal of Political Science. Vol 41 (01): 83110.
58. Reuter Ora John, and Robertson Graeme. (2015) “"Legislatures, Cooptation, and Social Protest in Contemporary Authoritarian Regimes”". The Journal of Politics Vol 77 (1): 235248.
59. Rivera Mauricio. (2016) “"Authoritarian Institutions and State Repression: The Divergent Effects of Legislatures and Opposition Parties on Personal Integrity Rights”" Journal of Conflict Resolution . doi: 10.1177/0022002716632301.
60. Roberts Sean. P. (2012) Putin’s United Russia Party . (New York; London: Routledge).
61. Roessler Phillip G., and Howard Marc M.,. (2009) “"Post-cold war political regimes: When do elections matter?"” in Democratization by Elections . Ed. By Lindberg. Staffan (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp. 10127.
62. Ross Cameron. (2014) “"Regional Elections and Electoral Malpractice in Russia: The Manipulation of Rules, Voters, and Votes”". Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.Vol 3(1): 147172.
63. Schedler Andreas. (2002) “"The Menu of Manipulation"”. Journal of Democracy. Vol 13 (2): 3650.
64. Schedler Andreas. (ed) (2006) Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition . (Boulder, Colo: L. Rienner Publishers).
65. Schedler Andreas,. (2009) “"Sources of Competition under Electoral Authoritarianism”" in Democratization by Elections . Ed. By Lindberg. Staffan (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press) pp. 10127.
66. Schedler Andreas. (2013) The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism . (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
67. Seeberg Merete Bech. (2014) “"State Capacity and the paradox of authoritarian elections”". Democratization.Vol 21(7): 12651285.
68. Shevtsova Lilia. (2012) “"Russia under Putin: Titanic looking for its iceberg?”" Communist and Post-Communist Studies Vol 45: 209216.
69. Silitski Vitali. (2005) “"Preempting democracy: The case of Belarus”". Journal of Democracy Vol 16 (4): 8397.
70. Simpser Alberto,. (2009) “"Unintended Consequences of Election Monitoring"” in Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation . Ed. Alvarez Michael,, Hall Thad, and Hyde. Susan Brookings Institution Press.
71. Simpser Alberto. (2013) Why governments and parties manipulate elections: theory, practice, and implications . New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Sjoberg Fredrik M. (2016) “"Bring the party back in: Institutional design for ‘smart election fraud’”". Electoral Studies Vol 44: 307318.
73. Stewart Susan. (2012) Presidents, oligarchs and bureaucrats: Forms of rule in the post-soviet space . (Burlington, vt; Farnham, Surrey, England;: Ashgate).
74. Stokes Susan C. (2005) “"Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina”". The American Political Science Review Vol 99, (3): 315325.
75. Tucker Joshua. (2002) “"The First Decade of Post-Communist Elections and Voting: What Have We Studied and How Have We Studied It?”" Annual Review of Political Science. Vol 5:271304.
76. Tucker Joshua. (2007) “"Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions"”. Perspectives of Politics .Vol 5(3): 535551.
77. Wilson Andrew. (2005) Virtual politics: faking democracy in the post-Soviet world . (New Haven: Yale University Press).
78. White Stephen, and Feklyunina Valentina (2011) “"Russia’s Authoritarian Elections: The View from Below”". Europe-Asia Studies Vol 63(4): 579602.
79. White Stephen, and Kryshtanovskaya Ol’ga (2011) “"Changing the Russian Election: Inside the Black Box”". Europe-Asia Studies Vol 63(4) 557578.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18763324-20171250
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763324-20171250
2018-12-14
2018-01-16

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation