Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Threat of Selective Democracy. Popular Dissatisfaction and Exclusionary Strategy of Elites in East Central and Southeastern Europe

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Southeastern Europe

The large dissatisfaction of citizens with post-communist democracy in Central and Eastern Europe favors populist and anti-systemic parties and movements. These parties accuse their rivals of various forms of corruption and prescribe anti-systemic cures, including the discretionary exclusion of their rivals from political life. Analyzing the situations in Poland, Romania, and Hungary more closely, we reveal a risk of the development of “selective democracy,” in which key elites and their supporters redefine the borders of the polity in an exclusionary way, denying various groups of “enemies” legitimate access and representation and thereby undermining basic democratic principles.

Affiliations: 1: a) Freie Universität Berlin ; 2: b) University of Amsterdam

10.1163/18763332-03603004
/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603004
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ascherson N. 2007. “ "Poland after PiS: Handle with care",” Open Democracy (October 26 th, 2010). < > (accessed August 16 th2009).
2. Bunce V. 2003. “ "Rethinking recent democratization: Lessons from the postcommunist experience",” World Politics Vol 55: 167192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.2003.0010
3. Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2002: Candidate Countries Eurobarometer Autumn 2002. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/cceb2_en.htm (accessed October 11 th, 2012).
4. Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 2003: Candidate Countries Eurobarometer 4/2003. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/cceb2_en.htm (11.10.2012).
5. Carbonnel A. de. 2010. “ "Russia uses extremism law to target dissenters",” Reuters (December 16 th). < > (accessed April 4 th2012).
6. Central and Eastern Eurobarometer 1995. Central and Eastern Eurobarometer 6. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/cceb_en.htm (accessed October 10 th, 2012).
7. Central and Eastern Eurobarometer 1997. Central and Eastern Eurobarometer 8. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/cceb_en.htm (accessed October 10 th, 2012).
8. Coleman J. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory ( Harvard: Harvard University Press).
9. Dragomir E. 2011. “ "The Romanian secret services, politics and the media: A structural overview",” Balkan Analysis (April 20 th). < > (accessed April 25 th2011).
10. Dumitrescu I. 2011. “ "SRI a ieşit de sub control parlamentar. De cinci ani",” Puterea (February 13 th). < > (accessed April 25 th2012).
11. Ekiert G. ,, Kubik J. ,and Vachudova M.A. . 2007. “ "Democracy in the post-communist world: An unending quest?"” East European Politics and Societies Vol 27: 730.
12. Eurobarometer 2004: Standard Eurobarometer 61. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb61/eb_61_en.pdf (accessed October 11 th, 2012)
13. Eurobarometer 2005: Standard Eurobarometer 64. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb64/eb64_en.htm (accessed October 11 th, 2012)
14. Eurobarometer 2006: Standard Eurobarometer 66. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb64/eb66_en.htm (accessed October 11 th, 2012)
15. Eurobarometer 2007: Standard Eurobarometer 68. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb68/eb_68_en.pdf (accessed October 11 th, 2012)
16. Freyberg-Inan A. ,and Varga M. . 2011. “ "Ungarn seit der Wahl – Demokratie unter Druck",” Berliner Debatte Initial Vol 22: 120126.
17. Fuchs D. ,and Roller E. . 2006. “ "Learned democracy? Support of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe",” International Journal of Sociology Vol 36: 7096. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/IJS0020-7659360303
18. Fuchs D. ,, Roller E. ,and Zagórski K. . 2006. “ "Interaction of social and political processes",” International Journal of Sociology Vol 36: 310.
19. Gaber R. , 2002. “ "Verlierer der transformation in Mittelosteuropa",” in Osteuropa Forschungsstelle (ed.) Gewinner und Verlierer Post-sozialistischer Transformationsprozesse ( Bremen: Forschungsstelle Osteuropa): 111117.
20. Gazeta Wyborcza 2007. “ "Kaczyński: Był zamach i ktoś skorzystał na śmierci brata"”, 09.04.2012, http://wyborcza.pl/1,105770,11503937,Kaczynski__Byl_zamach_i_ktos_skorzystal_na_smierci.html (accessed October 11 th, 2012).
21. Golinowska S. 2005. “ "Polish society 15 years after the round table: Its condition, social structure, attitudes, values and social capital",” in Poland: The Social Report ( Warsaw: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung): 139164.
22. Jacobs J. ,, Müller O. ,and Pickel G. ,. 2003. “ "Persistence of democracies in Central and Eastern Europe: Consolidation, stability, and people´s power of resisting",” in Pollack D. ,, Jacobs J. ,, Müller O. ,and Pickel G. (eds.) Political Culture in Post-communist Europe: Attitudes in New Democracies ( London: Aldershot): 91114.
23. Kitschelt H. 2000. “ "Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic policies",” Comparative Political Studies Vol 33: 845879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001041400003300607
24. ——. 2003. “ "Accounting for post-communist regime diversity. What counts as a good cause?"” in Ekiert G. ,and Hanson S. (eds.) Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 4988.
25. Krasnodębski Z. 2006. “ "Verlierer und Gewinner in Ostmitteleuropa",” OST-WEST: Europäische Perspektiven Vol 7: 93101.
26. Kulish N. 2011. “ "Foes of Hungary’s government fear ‘demolition of democracy’",” The New York Times (December 21 st): A6.
27. Marketing Leger . 2006. Voice of the People 2006: What the World Thinks on Today’s Global Issues ( Montreal: Transcontinental).
28. McFaul M. 2005. “ "Transitions from postcommunism",” Journal of Democracy Vol 16: 519.
29. Merkel W. ,, Puhle H.-J. ,and Croissant A. . (eds.) 2003. Aurel Croissant (Hrsg.): Defekte Demokratien. Bd.1, Theorien und Probleme ( Wiesbaden: Vs Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
30. ——. 2006. Defekte Demokratien. Bd.2, Defekte Demokratien in Osteuropa, Ostasien und Lateinamerika ( Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften).
31. Mesezhnikov G. ,, Gyarfasova O. ,and Smilov D. . 2008. Populist Politics and Liberal Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe ( Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs).
32. Pop-Elecheş G. 2007. “ "Historical legacies and post-communist regime change",” Journal of Politics Vol 69: 908926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00598.x
33. Scheppele K.L. 2012. “ "The new Hungarian Secret Police",” The New York Times Opinion Pages (April 19 th). < > (accessed April 25 th2012).
34. Segert D. 2008. “ "Parteiendemokratie in der Krise: Gründe und Grundlagen in Ostmitteleuropa",” Osteuropa Vol 58: 4961.
35. Semler C. 2007. “ "Etappensieg für Polens Demokraten",” Le Monde Diplomatique (June 2007). < > (accessed April 25 th2012).
36. Smilov D. 2008. “ "Bulgaria",” in Mesezhnikov et al. 2008: 1336.
37. Smilov D. ,and Krastev I. . 2008. “ "The rise of populism in Eastern Europe: Policy paper",” in Mesezhnikov et al. 2008: 712.
38. Tokfalvi E. 2011. “ "A FIDESZ megvalósította a Jobbik kormányprogramját",” Hírszerző (December 12 th). < > (accessed April 25 th2011).
39. Vachudova M.A. 2005. Europe Undivided. Democracy, Leverage, and Integration after Communism ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
40. Varga M. ,and Freyberg-Inan A. . 2009. “ "Demokratie okay, aber fuer alle? Demokratieunzufriedenheit und selektive Demokratie in Mittel- und Osteuropa",” Berliner Debatte Initial Vol 20: 104119.
41. ——. 2010. “ "Ungarn 2010: Die Bedeutung der Wahlergebnisse im kontext der demokratieentwicklung",” Berliner Debatte Vol 21: 6066.
42. Waldron-Moore P. 1999. “ "Eastern Europe at the crossroads of democratic transition: Evaluating support for democratic institutions, satisfaction with democratic government, and consolidation of democratic regimes",” Comparative Political Studies Vol 32: 3262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414099032001002
43. Wiesenthal H. 2001. Politics against Theory: On the Theoretical Consequences of Successful Large-scale Reforms in Postcommunist Europe . < > (accessed June 25 th2006).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603004
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603004
2012-01-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Southeastern Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation