Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Constrained Democracy: The Consolidation of Democracy in Yugoslav Successor States

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The development of democracy in the successor states of Yugoslavia illustrates the whole range of differences among these states: from Slovenia which is considered most advanced and consolidated, over Croatia which is on its way to become a consolidated democratic state, to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia which are seen as still very fragile zones for democracy to take roots in. While scholars refer to these latter cases as to failed or unconsolidated democracies, this article argues against the common theoretical framework and calls for the use of different theoretical and methodological tools to measure the (un)success of these states. For this purpose this article discusses the main (internal) features and weaknesses of these democracies and points at a number of external factors and internal objective circumstances, which (unintentionally) hinder the process of democratization.

Affiliations: 1: a)Professor of Southeast European Studies Director of the Centre for Southeast European Studies University of Graz, Austria ; 2: b) Institute of Social Sciences in Belgrade, Serbia 1

10.1163/18763332-03603005
/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603005
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Anderson B. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism , Revised and Ext ( Edition. London/New York: Verso).
2. Balfour R. ,and Stratulat C. . 2011. “ "The democratic transformation of the Balkans",” EPC Issue Paper 66. < >.
3. Bieber F. 2009. “ "Less diversity—more integration: Interethnic relations in the contemporary Balkans",” Southeastern Europe Vol 31–32: 2338.
4. ——. 2011. “ "Building impossible states? State-Building strategies and EU membership in the Western Balkans",” Europe-Asia Studies Vol 63( 10): 17831802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.618679
5. ——. 2012. “ "The Western Balkans are dead—long live the Balkans! Democratization and the limits of the EU",” in Džihić V. ,and Hamilton D.S. (eds.) Unfinished Business The Western Balkans and the International Community ( Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press).
6. Bieber F. ,and Keil S. . 2009. “ "Power-Sharing revisited—lessons learned in the Balkans?"” Review of Central and East European Law Vol 3( 4): 337360.
7. Boduszyński M. 2010. Regime Change in the Yugoslav Successor States. Divergent Paths towards a New Europe ( Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
8. Brenner C. , 1994. “ "Integrations- und Desintegrationsprozesse in multinationalen Gesellschaften. Einige Überlegungen zu den Theorien Otto Bauers und Karl Deutschs",” in Schmidt-Hartmann E. (ed.) Formen des Nationalen Bewußtseins im Lichte Zeitgenössischer Nationalismustheorien – Vorträge der Tagung des Collegium Carolinum in Bad Wiessee vom 31.10. bis 3.11.1991 ( München: Oldenbourg): 113127.
9. Brusis M. 2008. “ "Evidence of convergence? The Western Balkan countries in democracy and governance assessments",” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies Vol 8( 4): 379397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683850802556392
10. Cohen L. , 2007“ "The Europeanization of ‘defective democracies’ in the Western Balkans: Pre-Accession challenges to democratic consolidation",” in DeBardeleben J. (ed.) The Boundaries of EU Enlargement: Finding a Place for Neighbours ( London: Palgrave): 205221.
11. Cohen L. ,and Lampe J. . 2011. Embracing Democracy in the Western Balkans: From Postconflict Struggles toward European Integration ( Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
12. Diamond L. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation ( Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).
13. Džihić V. ,and Segert D. . 2011. “ "Lessons from ‘Post-Yugoslav’ democratization functional problems of stateness and the limits of democracy",” East European Politics & Societies published online 3 May 2011. < >.
14. Džihić V. ,and Wieser A. . 2011. “ "Incentives for democratisation? Effects of EU conditionality on democracy in Bosnia & Hercegovina",” Europe-Asia Studies Vol 63( 10): 18031825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.618681
15. Ekiert G. ,, Kubik J. ,and Vachudova M.A. . 2007. “ "Democracy in the post-communist World: An unending quest?"” East European Politics & Societies Vol 21: 730. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325406297170
16. Ernst A. 2011. “ "Nord-Kosovo: Die Krise als Chance",” Südosteuropa Mitteilungen Vol 5–6: 2637.
17. Fukuyama F. 2004. State Building. Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century ( London: Profile Books).
18. Gromes T. 2007. Demokratisierung nach Bürgerkriegen. Das Beispiel Bosnien und Herzegowina, Studien der Hessischen Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Band 56 ( Frankfurt/New York: Campus).
19. ——. 2012. “ "Ohne Staat und Nation ist keine Demokratie zu machen. Bosnien und Herzegowina, Kosovo und Makedonien nach den Bürgerkriegen",” Studien der Hessischen Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung 17 ( Baden-Baden: Nomos).
20. Grugel J. 2002. Democratization: A Critical Introduction ( New York: Palgrave).
21. Grzymala-Busse A. 2007. “ "Encouraging effective democratic competition",” East European Politics & Societies Vol 21: 91110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325406297129
22. Held D. 1996. Models of Democracy ( Cambridge: Polity Press).
23. Hroch M. 1990. “ "How much does Nation formation depend on Nationalism?"” East European Politics & Society Vol 4( 1) (Winter): 101115.
24. ——. 1996. “ "From National movement to the fully-formed Nation: The Nation-Building process in Europe",” in Balakrishnan G. (ed.) Mapping the Nation ( London: Verso): 7897.
25. Höpken W. 2009. “ "Gibt es eine ‘balkanische’ politische Kultur?"” Südosteuropa Mitteilungen Vol 6: 3047.
26. Ignatieff M. , 2003. “ "State failure and nation-building",” in Holzgrefe J.L. ,and Keohane R.O. (eds.) Humanitarian Intervention. Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 299321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511494000.010
27. Konitzer A. , 2012. “ "Speaking European: Conditionality, public attitudes and Pro-European party rhetoric in the Western Balkans",” in Bieber F. (ed.) EU Conditionality in the Western Balkans ( London & New York: Routledge): 79114.
28. Krastev I. 2002. “ "The Balkans. Democracy without choices",” Journal of Democracy Vol 13( 3): 3953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0046
29. Linz J. ,and Stepan A. . 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe ( Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).
30. Matić J. 2011. Citizens’ Perceptions of Serbia as ‘Mixed Democracy’ – Internal Report( Belgrade: Institute of Social Sciences).
31. Merkel W. 2004. “ "Embedded and defective democracies",” Democratization Vol 11( 5): 3358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510340412331304598
32. ——. 2007. “ "Gegen alle Theorie? Die Konsolidierung der Demokratie in Ostmitteleuropa",” Politische Vierteljahresschrift Vol 48: 413433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11615-007-0085-7
33. Mungiu-Pippidi A. 2005. “ "Deconstructing Balkan particularism: The ambiguous social capital of Southeastern Europe",” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies Vol 5: 4968. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1468385042000328367
34. Mungiu-Pippidi A. ,and Krastev I. ,. 2004. “ "Naučene lekcije: Izgradnja nacije i države posle komunizma",” in A. Mungiu-Pippidi and Krastev I. (ed.) Nacionalizam Posle Komunizma – Naučene Lekcije ( Belgrade: BFPI): 299316.
35. Noutcheva G. ,and Aydin-Düzgit S. . 2012. “ "Lost in Europeanisation: The Western Balkans and Turkey",” West European Politics Vol 35( 1): 5978. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.631313
36. Offe C. 1991. “ "Das Dilemma der Gleichzeitigkeit. Demokratisierung und Marktwirtschaft in Osteuropa",” Merkur Vol 4: 279292.
37. Pavlović D. ,and Antonić S. . 2007. Konsolidacija demokratskih ustanova u Srbiji Posle 2000. Godine ( Beograd: Službeni glasnik).
38. Pešić V. 2007. State Capture and Widespread Corruption in Serbia , CEPS Working DocumentNo. 262. < >.
39. Pollack D. 13. September 2004. “ "Nationalismus und Europaskepsis in den postkommunistischen Staaten Mittel- und Osteuropas",” Aus Politik und ZeitgeschichteB Vol 38/ 2004: 3038.
40. Pop-Eleches G. 2007. “ "Between historical legacies and the promise of Western integration: Democratic conditionality after communism",” East European Politics & Societies Vol 21: 142161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325406297126
41. Raik K. 2004. “ "EU accession of Central and Eastern European Countries: Democracy and integration as conflicting logics",” East European Politics & Societies Vol 18: 567594. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325404269719
42. Roeder P. ,and Rothchild D. ,. 2005. “ "Power sharing as an impediment to peace and democracy",” in P. Roeder and Rothchild D. (eds.) Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy after Civil Wars ( Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press): 2950.
43. Ruiz-Jiménez A.M. ,and Torreblanca J.I. . 2008. Is There a Trade-off between Deepening and Widening? What do Europeans Think ? CEPIN Working Paper 17. < >.
44. Snyder J. 2000. From Voting to Violence. Democratization and Nationalist Conflict ( New York: Norton).
45. Stefanovic D. 2008. “ "The path to Weimar Serbia? Explaining the resurgence of the Serbian far right after the fall of Milosevic",” Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol 31( 7): 11951221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870701682303
46. Štiks I. ,and Horvat S. . 2012. “ "Welcome to the desert of transition! Post-Socialism, the European Union, and a new left in the Balkans",” Monthly Review Vol 63: 10. < >.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603005
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03603005
2012-01-01
2016-12-06

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Southeastern Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation