Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The EU’s Pathological Power: The Failure of External Rule of Law Promotion in South Eastern Europe

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Southeastern Europe

What impact does the European Union (EU) have on the development of the rule of law in South Eastern Europe (SEE)? The author of this article argues and shows that the EU has: 1) a positively reinforcing (healthy) effect with regard to judicial capacity and substantive legality, i.e. the alignment of domestic legislation with international standards, and 2) a negatively reinforcing (pathological) effect with regard to judicial impartiality and formal legality (the inner morality of law). The author explains the pathological impact of EU-driven rule of law reforms by referring to the EU’s deficient reform approach and to unfavorable domestic conditions, which in their interplay reinforce certain reform pathologies (legal instability, incoherence, politicization) that undermine the rule of law. The main argument is supported by a mixed method study. A quantitative indicator-based analysis measures rule of law development across four key dimensions on the basis of a variety of data (e.g. survey-based indicators, CEPEJ data, and a unique dataset on legislative output). Additionally, the author draws on a number of qualitative interviews that he conducted with magistrates from SEE and representatives from the EU, the European Court of Human Rights, and the Council of Europe. The author concludes from these findings that external rule of law promotion in weak rule of law countries is not transformative, but rather reinforces systemic deficiencies that undermine the rule of law.

Affiliations: 1: University of Trier, Department of Sociology


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Agh A. 1998. The Politics of Central Europe (London: Sage).
2. Alkon C. 2010. “"Plea Bargaining as a Legal Transplant: A Good Idea for Troubled Criminal Justice Systems?”" Transnational Law and Contemporary Problems Vol 19(2): 355418.
3. Belloni R. ,, and Strazzari F. 2014. “"Corruption in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: a deal among friends”" Third World Quarterly Vol 35(5): 855871.
4. Beširević V. 2014. “"Governing without judges: The politics of the Constitutional Court in Serbia”" International Journal of Constitutional Law Vol 12(4): 954979.
5. Bobek M. , and Kosar D. 2014. “"Global Solutions, Local Damages: A Critical Study in Judicial Councils in Central and Eastern Europe”" German Law Journal Vol 15(2): 12571292.
6. Börzel T. A. , and Pamuk Y. 2012. “"Pathologies of Europeanisation: fighting corruption in the Southern Caucasus”" West European Politics Vol 35(1): 7997.
7. Bozhilova D. 2007. “"Measuring Successes and Failures of Eu-Europeanization in the Eastern Enlargement: Judicial Reform in Bulgaria”" European Journal of Law Reform Vol 9(2): 285319.
8. Capussela A. L. 2015. State-Building in Kosovo: Democracy, Corruption and the eu in the Balkans (London: IB Tauris).
9. Channell W. 2006. “"Lessons Not Learned: Problems with Western Aid for Law Reform in Post-Communist Countries”" Journal of Comparative Law , Vol 1(2): 321337.
10. Coman R. 2014. “"Quo vadis judicial reforms? The quest for judicial independence in Central and Eastern Europe”" Europe-Asia Studies Vol 66(6): 892924.
11. Creswell J. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (London: Sage).
12. Dallara C. 2014. Democracy and judicial reforms in South-East Europe. Between the eu and the legacies of the past (Cham: Springer).
13. Dimitrov G. ,, Haralampiev K. ,, Stoychev S. , and Toneva-Metodieva L. 2014. The Cooperation and Verification Mechanism: Shared Political Irresponsibility between the European Commission and the Bulgarian Governments (Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press).
14. Dimitrova G. 2002. “"The limits of Europeanization: Hegemony and its misuse in the political field of Bulgaria”" Southeast European and Black Sea Studies Vol 2(2): 6992.
15. Ekiert G. ,, & Hanson S. E. 2003. Capitalism and democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the legacy of communist rule (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
16. Ekiert G. ,, Kubik J. , and Vachudová M. A. 2007. “"Democracy in the Post-Communist World: An Unending Quest?”" East European Politics and Societies Vol 21(1): 730.
17. Elbasani A. (ed.). 2013. European integration and transformation in the western Balkans. Europeanization or business as usual? (New York: Routledge).
18. Fagan A. 2005. “"Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech Republic”" Democratization Vol 12(4): 528547.
19. Fuller L. L. 1969. The morality of law (New Haven, London: Yale University Press).
20. Goetz K. H. ,, and Zubek R. 2007. “"Government, Parliament and Law-making in Poland”" The Journal of Legislative Studies Vol 13(4): 517538.
21. Grabbe H. 2006. The eu’s transformative power. Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
22. Grzymala-Busse A. M. 2002. Redeeming the communist past: The regeneration of communist parties in East Central Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
23. Hall P. A. 1993. “"Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain”" Comparative politics Vol 25(3): 275296.
24. Jacoby W. 2006. “"Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations”" World Politics Vol 58(04): 623651.
25. kipred . 2011. "“The Inseparable Power: An analysis of the independence of the judiciary in Kosovo”"<>.
26. Klitgaard R. 1998 “"International Cooperation Against Corruption".” Finance and Development Vol 35(1): 36.
27. Kochenov D. 2008. " eu enlargement and the failure of conditionality ". Pre-accession conditionality in the fields of democracy and the rule of law (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer).
28. Kuzmova Y. 2014. “"Bulgarian Specialized Criminal Court after One Year: A Misplaced Transplant, an Instrument of Justice, or a Tool of Executive Power”" Boston University International Law Journal Vol 32: 227262.
29. Landman T. 2004. “"Measuring Human Rights: Principle, Practice and Policy”" Human Rights Quarterly Vol 26(4): 906931.
30. Levitz P. , and Pop-Eleches G. 2010. “"Why No Backsliding? The European Union’s Impact on Democracy and Governance Before and After Accession”" Comparative Political Studies Vol 43(4): 457485.
31. Meagher P. 2005. “"Anti‐corruption agencies: Rhetoric Versus reality”" The Journal of Policy Reform Vol 8(1): 69103.
32. Magen A. 2007. “"Transformative Engagement through Law: The Acquis Communautaire as an Instrument of eu External Influence”" European Journal of Law Reform Vol 9(3): 361392.
33. Magen A. , and Morlino L. 2009. International actors, democratization and the rule of law. Anchoring democracy? (New York: Routledge).
34. Mendelski M. 2009. “"The Impact of the European Union on Governance Reforms in Post-Communist Europe: A Comparison between First and Second-Wave Candidates”" Romanian Journal of Political Science Vol 9(2): 4264.
35. ———. 2011. “"Rule of Law Reforms in the Shadow of Clientelism: The Limits of the eu’s Transformative Power in Romania”" Polish Sociological Review Vol 2 (174): 235253.
36. ———. 2012. “" eu-Driven Judicial Reforms in Romania: A Success Story?”" East European Politics Vol 28(1): 2342.
37. ———. 2013a. “Where does the European Union make a Difference? Rule of Law Development in the Western Balkans and beyond” in A. Elbasani, European integration and the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? (London: Routledge), pp. 101–118.
38. ———. 2013b. “"They Have Failed Again! Donor-driven Promotion of the Rule of Law in Serbia”" Südost-Europa: Zeitschrift für Politik und Gesellschaft Vol 61(1): 79113.
39. Mendelski M. , and Libman A. . 2014. “"Demand for Litigation in the Absence of Traditions of Rule of Law: An Example of Ottoman and Habsburg Legacies in Romania”" Constitutional Political Economy Vol 25(2): 177206.
40. Mungiu-Pippidi A. 2014. “"The Transformative Power of Europe Revisited”" Journal of Democracy Vol 25(1): 2032.
41. Myrdal G. 1957. Economic theory and under-developed regions (London: Gerald Druckworth).
42. North D. C. ,, Wallis J. J. , and Weingast B. R. 2009. Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
43. Noutcheva G. , and Bechev D. 2008. “"The Successful Laggards: Bulgaria and Romania’s Accession to the eu”" East European Politics & Societies Vol 22(1): 114144.
44. osce . 2009. "“Legal analysis: independence of the judiciary”" <>.
45. ———. 2012. Independence of the Judiciary in Kosovo: Institutional and Functional Dimensions, <>.
46. Parau C. E. 2015. “"Explaining Governance of the Judiciary in Central and Eastern Europe: External Incentives, Transnational Elites and Parliamentary Inaction”" Europe-Asia Studies Vol 67(3): 409442.
47. Peshkopia R. 2014. Conditioning Democratization: Institutional Reforms and eu Membership Conditionality in Albania and Macedonia (London: Anthem Press).
48. Piana D. 2009. “"The Power Knocks at the Courts’ Back Door: Two Waves of Postcommunist Judicial Reforms”" Comparative Political Studies Vol 42(6): 816840.
49. Pop‐Eleches G. 2007. “"Historical legacies and post‐communist regime change”" Journal of Politics Vol 69(4): 908926.
50. Prado M. ,, and Trebilcock M. 2009. “"Path Dependence, Development, and the Dynamics of Institutional Reform”" University of Toronto Law Journal Vol 59(3): 341380.
51. Pridham G. 2005. Designing democracy. e.u. enlargement and regime change in post-communist Europe (New York: Palgrave).
52. Radin A. 2014. “"Analysis of current events: towards the rule of law in Kosovo: eulex should go”" Nationalities Papers Vol 42(2): 181194.
53. Risteska M. 2013. “"The role of the eu in promoting good governance in Macedonia: towards efficiency and effectiveness or deliberative democracy?”" Nationalities Papers Vol 41(3): 431446.
54. Sadurski W. 2004. “"Accession’s democracy dividend: The impact of the eu enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of Central and Eastern Europe”" European Law Journal Vol 10(4): 371401.
55. Schimmelfennig F. 2012. “"Europeanization beyond Europe”" Living Reviews in European Governance Vol 7(1): 131.
56. Schimmelfennig F. , and Sedelmeier U. 2005. The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
57. Seibert-Fohr A. 2012. Judicial independence in transition (Berlin: Springer).
58. Bosnia Sigma . 2012. “Bosnia and Herzegovina Assessment Report 2012” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2012/06, oecd. <>.
59. Montenegro Sigma . 2012. “Montenegro Assessment Report 2012” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2012/03, oecd, <>.
60. Kosovo Sigma . 2011. “Sigma Assessment Report 2011” sigma Country Assessment Reports, 2011/05, oecd <>.
61. Simmons B. A. 2009. Mobilizing for human rights: international law in domestic politics . (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
62. Spendzharova A. B. ,, and Vachudova M. A. 2012. “"Catching up? Consolidating liberal democracy in Bulgaria and Romania after eu accession”" West European Politics Vol 35(1): 3958.
63. Stewart S. 2009. “"The interplay of domestic contexts and external democracy promotion: lessons from Eastern Europe and the South Caucasus”" Democratization Vol 16(4): 804824.
64. Tamanaha B. Z. 2004. On the rule of law. History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
65. Teubner G. 1998. “"Legal irritants: good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergencies”" The Modern Law Review Vol 61(1): 1132.
66. Toneva-Metodieva L. 2014. “"Beyond the Carrots and Sticks Paradigm: Rethinking the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism Experience of Bulgaria and Romania”" Perspectives on European Politics and Society Vol 15(4): 534551.
67. Vachudova M. A. 2005. Europe undivided. Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Southeastern Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation