Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Thanking the Greeks: The Crisis of the Rule of Law in EU Enlargement Regulation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Southeastern Europe

This paper showcases the weaknesses of EU enlargement law and demonstrates how one Member State – namely, Greece – is notable for abusing this weakness, for harming the candidate countries, the EU, and the institutions alike, for stripping the EU position of its predictability, and for undermining the EU Commission’s efforts. Accordingly, Greece has severely incapacitated the key procedural rule of law component of the EU’s enlargement regulation, turning it into a randomised political game and ignoring any long-term goals of stability, prosperity, and peace that the process is to stand for. Following a walk through Greece’s engagement throughout a number of enlargement rounds, the paper concludes that the duty of loyalty – which is presumably able to discipline Member States that undermine the common effort – should find a new meaning in the context of EU enlargement.

Affiliations: 1: University of Groningen, e.basheska@gmail.com ; 2: lapa, Princeton Uversity; University of Groningen, kochenov@princeton.edu

10.1163/18763332-03903006
/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03903006
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03903006
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Arıkan. H. 2003. ‘"Good Neighbourliness Condition for eu Membership: The eu Policy Towards the Cyprus Conflict and its Security Implications’" Ankara Universitesi Sıyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi Vol 58(4): 2547.
2. Arvanitopoulos C. (ed). 2009. Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: An Unusual Candidacy (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag).
3. Athanasopulos H. 2001. Greece, Turkey and the Aegean Sea (Jefferson, NC: McFarland).
4. Bahcheli T. 2003. ‘"Cycles of Tension and Rapprochement: Prospects for Turkey’s Relations with Greece"’ in Ismael. T. Y. and Aydın. M. (eds). Turkey’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century: A Changing Role in World Politics (Aldershot: Ashgate): 16180.
5. ———. 2004. ‘"Turning a New Page in Turkey’s Relations with Greece? The Challenge of Reconciling Vital Interests"’ in Aydin. M. and Ifantis. K. (eds). Turkish-Greek Relations: The Security Dilemma in the Aegean (London/NY: Routledge): 95122.
6. Basheska. E. 2015. "‘The Position of the Good Neighbourliness Principle in International and eu law’" in Kochenov. D. and Basheska. E. (eds). Good Neighbourliness in European Legal Context (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff): 2456.
7. Berridge. G. 1996. ‘"The un and the world diplomatic system: lessons from the Cyprus and us-North Korea talks"’ in Bourantonis. D. and Evriviades. M. L. (eds). A United Nations for the Twenty-First Century: Peace, Security, and Development (The Hague: Kluwer Law Intl): 10526.
8. Blokker. P. 2006. ‘"The Post-enlargement European Order: Europe “United in Diversity”?"’ European Democracy and Autonomy Papers (Vol 1).
9. Bölükbaşi. D. 2004. Turkey and Greece: The Aegean Disputes (London: Cavendish).
10. Bourne. A. K. 2003. ‘"European Integration and Conflict Resolution in the Basque country, Northern Ireland and Cyprus"’ Perspectives on European Politics and Society Vol 4(3): 391415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705850308438870
11. Çakir. A. E. 2010. ‘"Political Dimension: Always in the List of “Also-rans”: Turkey’s Rivals in eu–Turkey Relations"’ in Çakir. A. E. (ed). Fifty Years of eu–Turkey Relations: A Sisyphean Story (London/NY: Routledge): 10–46.
12. Canefe. N. , and Ugur. M. (eds). 2004. Turkey and European Integration: Accession Prospects and Issues (London/NY: Routledge).
13. CoE: Parliamentary Assembly. 2008. Working papers, Ordinary Session (Second part) 14–18 April, Volume iii: 37–41.
14. Cremona. M. 2012. "‘Introduction’" in Cremona. M. (ed). Compliance and the Enforcement of eu Law (Oxford: oup): xl.
15. Davis R. 1997. "‘The “Problem of de Gaulle”: British Reactions to General de Gaulle’s Veto of the uk Application to Join the Common Market’ J ". Contemporary History Vol 32(4): 45364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002200949703200403
16. Engert S. 2010. eu Enlargement and Socialization: Turkey and Cyprus (ny: Routledge): 5265.
17. Grabbe. H. 2003. "‘Challenges of eu Enlargement’" in Lieven. A. and Trenin. D. V. (eds). Ambivalent Neighbours: The eu, nato and the Price of Membership (Washington, dc: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace): 67–89.
18. Grigoriadis. I. N. 2014. "‘The Changing Role of the eu Factor in Greek-Turkish Relations’" London School of Economics and Political Science Hellenic Observatory, Symposium Paper, <> [accessed on 31 October 2015].
19. Hillion. C. 2010. "‘The Creeping Nationalisation of the eu Enlargement Policy’" sieps (6).
20. ———. 2011. "‘eu Enlargement’" in Craig. P. P. and de Búrca. G. (eds). The Evolution of eu Law, 2nd edn (Oxford: oup): 187–216.
21. ———. and Wessel. R. 2008. "‘Restraining External Competences of eu Member States under cfsp’" in Cremona. M. and de Witte. B. (eds). eu Foreign Relations Law, Constitutional Fundamentals (Oxford: Hart Publishing): 79–121.
22. Hoffmeister. F. 2006. Special Legal Aspects of the Cyprus Problem: Annan Plan and eu Accession (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).
23. House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee. ‘uk–Turkey Relations and Turkey’s Regional Role’, 81–85, <> [accessed on 31 October 2015].
24. Hughes. E. 2011. Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: The Politics of Exclusion? (London/ny: Routledge).
25. Kanarek. D. A. 2003. ‘"Case Law: Turkey and the European Union: The Path to Accession’" cjel (Vol 9): 45774.
26. Karatas E. , 2011. "‘The Politics of Accession’" in Ker-Lindsay J. ,, Faustmann H. , and Mullen. F. (eds). An Island in Europe: The eu and the Transformation of Cyprus (ny: I.B. Tauris): 1341.
27. Kochenov D. 2005. ‘"eu Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty-Custom Concubinage"’ EIoP Vol 9(6).
28. ———. 2008. eu Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality (The Hague: Kluwer Law Intl).
29. ———. 2011. ‘"enp’s New Developments: Imitating Change – Ignoring the Problems"’ Comparative European Politics (Vol 9): 58195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.18
30. Laulhé Shaelou S. 2010. The eu and Cyprus: Principles and Strategies of Full Integration (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).
31. McCartan. G. 2002. ‘Frictions Emerge over Enlargement of European Union’ The Militant (1 July 2002) <> [accessed on 18 November 2015].
32. Messineo. F. 2012. ‘"Maps of Ephemeral Empires: The icj and the Macedonian Name Dispute’" cjicl (Vol 1): 16990.
33. Moravcsik. A. and Vachudova. M. A. 2003. ‘"National Interests, State Power, and eu Enlargement’" East European Politics and Societies Vol 17(1): 4257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0888325402239682
34. Nicolaïdes. P. et al. 1999. A Guide to the Enlargement of the European Union (Maastricht: eipa).
35. Pace. M. 2006. The Politics of Regional Identity: Meddling with the Mediterranean (Abingdon/ny: Routledge).
36. Preston C. 1997. The Enlargement and Integration of the European Union: Issues and Strategies (London/ny: Routledge).
37. Rodin S. 2012. ‘"The European Union and the Western Balkans: Does the Lisbon Treaty Matter?"’ in Bindi. F. and Angelescu. I. (eds). The Foreign Policy of the European Union , 2 nd edn (Washington: Brookings Institution Press): 15371.
38. Rumelili B. 2008. ‘"Transforming the Greek-Turkish conflicts: the eu and “what we make of it”!"’ in Diez. T., Stetter. S. and Albert. M. (eds). The European Union and Border Conflicts: The Power of Integration and Association (Cambridge: cup): 94128.
39. Šabič Z. , 2002. ‘"Slovenia and the European Union: A Different Kind of Two-Level Game"’ in Linden R. H. (ed). Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and Eastern European States (Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield): 91127.
40. Smith K. E. , 2003. ‘"The Evolution and Application of eu Membership Conditionality"’ in Cremona M. (ed). The Enlargement of the European Union (Oxford: oup): 10540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199260942.003.0005
41. Spiteri S. 2002. "‘Greece: without Cyprus no eu enlargement’" eu Observer (13 June) <> [accessed on 31 October 2015].
42. Tocci. T. 2002. ‘"Cyprus and the European Union Accession Process: Inspiration for Peace or Incentive for Crisis’" Turkish Studies Vol 3(2): 10438.
43. ———. 2004. eu Accession Dynamics and Conflict Resolution: Catalysing Peace Or Consolidating Partition in Cyprus (Aldershot: Ashgate).
44. Tsakonas. P. J. 2009. ‘"How Can the European Union Transform the Greek-Turkish Conflict"’ in Arvanitopoulos. C. (ed). Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: An Unusual Candidacy (Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag): 10720.
45. Tsardanidas C. , and Stavridis S. , 2011. "‘Greece: From Special Case to Limited Europeanization’" in Wong R. , and Hill C. (eds). National and European Foreign Policies: Towards Europeanization (London/NY: Routledge): 11130.
46. Tulmets E. 2008. ‘"A “Soft Power” with Civilian Means: Can the eu Bridge its Capability-Expectations Gap in the enp?"’ in Delcour. L. and Toulmets. E. (eds). 2008. Pioneer Europe? Testing eu Foreign Policy in the Neighbourhood (Baden-Baden: Nomos): 13358.
47. Uilenreef A. 2010. "‘Bilateral Barriers or Good Neighbourliness?’" Clingendael European Papers , 15–22, <> [accessed on 31 October 2015].
48. Vachudova M. A. 2005. Europe Undivided (Oxford: oup).
49. Wall S. 2013. The Official History of Britain and the European Community: From Rejection to Referendum, 1963–1975 , vol 2 (ny: Routledge).
50. Wallace W. 2003. ‘"Looking after the Neighbourhood: Responsibilities for the eu-25"’ Notre Europe Policy Paper No. 4 .
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03903006
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-03903006
2015-12-22
2018-09-19

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Southeastern Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation