Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Planning the Socialist Housing District in Bucharest and the Soviet influence, 1947–1960

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Southeastern Europe

This article details some of the processes through which Romanian architectural culture transformed under Soviet influence in the 1950s and through which architects came to redefine the organization of the profession, the planning of the city, and methods of design.The urban housing district (referred to as cvartal) and the rationalization of architectural design through type-solutions (tipizare or typization) were two architectural themes of particular political consequence and thus especially subjected to the pressures of Soviet precedent. The article shows, however, that the Soviet principles and policies brought to bear on the design of architectural types and the planning of the cvartal belonged in large part to a set of generic modernist principles that crossed political lines.The article aims to nuance the negative view of Sovietization as the imposition of entirely foreign concerns: archival sources, publications of the time, and architectural examples show that Soviet models reoriented but continued preexisting Romanian preoccupations with the planning of the modern city. Furthermore, Sovietization was not an isolationist phenomenon that hindered innovation: rather than standing as an obstacle to modernization, Soviet models connected Romania’s architectural culture to international postwar debates on mass housing and new urban forms.

Affiliations: 1: University of San Diego, USA, jmaxim@sandiego.edu

10.1163/18763332-04102003
/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-04102003
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-04102003
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. 1935. Planul director de sistematizare. (Bucharest: Institutul urbanistic al României).
2. 1954. “Expoziția ‘Să cunoaștem capitala constructorilor comunismului,’” Arhitectura rpr 9.
3. 1957. Arkhitekura sssr 3 (1957); translated in Buletin documentar arhitectură urbanism 3 (March 1957).
4. 1959. “Marea sărbătoare,” Arhitectura 7, 4.
5. Anderson R. 2010. The Future of History: The Cultural Politics of Soviet Architecture, 1928–41 (PhD dissertation, Columbia University).
6. anic (Arhivele Naționale Istorice Centrale, National Central Historical Archives), Fond Cabinetul Consiliului de Miniștri, file 9/1953.
7. anic, Fond C.C. al pcr – Propagandă și agitație, file 118/1955.
8. anic, Fond C.C. al pcr – Secția economică, file 452/1952.
9. anic, Fond C.C. al pcr – Secția economică, file 452/1952.
10. anic, Fond Consiliul de Miniștri al României – Cabinet, file 6/1952.
11. anic, Fond Consiliul de Miniștri al României – Cabinet, file 6/1956.
12. Bădescu N. 1954. “"Un deceniu de importante transformări în arhitectura din R.P.R.",” Arhitectura rpr Vol 6–7.
13. Baranov N. 1958. “"Raportul general la congres (Extrase)",” Arhitectura rpr Vol 6, 12 (December 1958), 26.
14. Cioroianu A. 2005. Pe umerii lui Marx. O întroducere în istoria comunismului românesc (Bucharest: Curtea Veche, 2005).
15. Comitetul central al P.M.R. și Consiliul de Miniștri al rpr. 1952. Hotărîre cu privire la planul general de reconstrucție socialistă a orașului București (Bucharest: Editura pentru literatură politică).
16. Danta D. 1993. “"Ceaușescu's work in Bucharest",” Geographical Review Vol 83, 2 (April 1993).
17. De Michelis,, Pasini M., E. 1976. "La città sovietica, 1925–1937" (Venice: Marsilio Editori).
18. Dobrincu D. 2003. “"The Soviet Councilors’ involvement in postwar Romanian repressive and military structures",” in A. Zub and F. Solomon (eds.), Sovietization in Romania and Czechoslovakia. History, Analogies, Consequences (Bucharest: Polirom): 157174.
19. Essaian E. 2010. “"Kvartal",” in C. Topalov et al., L’aventure des mots de la ville (Paris: Robert Laffont) : 660666.
20. Evolceanu T. 1949. “"Despre concepția urbanistică sovietică",” Revistele Tehnice agir Vol 3, 4.
21. Glendinning M. 2009. “"Cold-War conciliation: international architectural congresses in the late 1950s and early 1960s",” The Journal of Architecture Vol 14, 2: 197217.
22. Glendinning M.,, Muthesius S. 1994. Tower Block (New Haven: Yale University Press).
23. Grama E. 2012. “"Impenetrable Plans and Porous Expertise: Building a Socialist Bucharest, Reconstructing Its Past (1958–1968)",” eui Working Papers, Max Weber Programme .
24. Jannière H. 2008. “"Planifier le quotidien",” Strates Vol 14 (2008).
25. Laurian A.R. 1952 “"Reconstrucția socialistă a orașului București",” Arhitectură și urbanism Vol 12.
26. Lăzărescu C. 1976. “"Proiectarea ansamblurilor de locuinţe în perioada 1976–1980",” Arhitectura Vol 3.
27. Mărginean M. 2008. “"Aesthetic Mechanisms of Stalinization in Romanian Architecture: The Case of Hunedoara, 1947–1958"” (Masters’ thesis, University of Saskatchewan).
28. Mircea Enescu I. 2005. “"Anatomia unor vremuri abominabile",” in Arhitecți în timpul dictaturii (Bucharest: Simetria): 29106.
29. Molnar V. 2013. Building the State. Architecture, politics, and state formation in post-war Central Europe (Abington, UK and New York: Routledge).
30. Peteri G. 2008. “"The Occident Within—or The Drive for Exceptionalism and Modernity",” Kritika Vol 9, 4 (Fall 2008): 929937.
31. Popescu C. 2004. Le style national roumain. Construire une nation a travers l’architecture, 1881–1945 (Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes).
32. Przylubsky M. 1999. “"Projets d’état et ateliers privés en Europe de l’Est: l’exemple polonais",” in Histoire de l’architecte (Paris: Flammarion): 222230.
33. Sburcu N. 1954. “"Locuințe noi în cartierul Vatra Luminoasă-București",” Arhitectura rpr Vol 9.
34. Schwartz F. J. 1996. The Werkbund. Design Theory and Mass Culture before the First World War (New Haven: Yale University Press).
35. Sprague A. 1974. “Introduction,” to N.A. Miliutin, Sotsgorod (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
36. Stroe M. 2016. Locuirea între proiect și decizie politică 1954–1966 (Bucharest: Simetria).
37. Urban F. 2011. Tower and Slab: Histories of Global Mass Housing (London, Routledge).
38. Zahariade A.M. 2011. Arhitectura în proiectul comunist. România 1944–1989 [Architecture in the Communist Project. Romania 1944–1989] (Bucharest: Simetria).
39. Zarecor K.E. 2011. Manufacturing a Socialist Modernity (Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press).
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-04102003
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18763332-04102003
2017-06-09
2018-07-23

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Southeastern Europe — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation