Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Social Co-Governance

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

A Solution Originated from the Legitimacy Demands of Multiple Parties

image of The China Nonprofit Review

In the past 20-30 years, industrialization and informatization made the society more complicated and social conflicts more difficult to deal with; citizens and their demands diversified, and we are now in urgent need of a new public administration model that suits the changed political, economic, and social conditions. Governance thus emerged worldwide, promoting government reforms and public participation, and urging the government to delegate and empower, and quit the fields that they are not good at managing. Scholars discuss the reasons for the emergence of governance from the perspectives of managerialism, the rise of civil society, and administrative reforms. But these are not the only reasons for governance to rise to prominence. It emerged, in a way, in response to the “legitimation crisis” described by Jurgen Habermas. As society develops, citizens require more legitimacy from the government on the basis of what it already provides, and this may involve performance, participation, responsiveness, law-based administration, etc. We hereby analyze the legitimation crisis in a postmodern society and point out that the paradigm of social co-governance is a response to these legitimacy demands and that multiple parties integrate their demands using governance tools such as participation, consultation, empowerment, etc.

Affiliations: 1: Nanjing Tech University kxgwct@sina.com ; 2: Tsinghua University lanyx@tsinghua.edu.cn

10.1163/18765149-12341323
/content/journals/10.1163/18765149-12341323
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18765149-12341323
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Cao Renhe"“Legitimation Crisis: Analysis of the Reasons for the Rise of Governance”" Theory And Reform 2006Vol 2
2. Chen Binghui"“Tentative Analysis the Reconstructive Legitimacy Theory of Habermas”" Cass Journal of Political Science 1998Vol 2
3. Osborne D., Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector 1993 Reading, MA Addison-Wesley
4. Stoker G. “Governance As Theory: Five Propositions” 1998 UNESCO
5. Guo Xiaodong"“Refined Legitimacy Theory in the Reflection of Multiple Values”" Tianjin Social Sciences 2005Vol 2
6. Coicaud Jean-Marc Legitimacy and Politics 2002 Beijing Central Compilation & Translation Press [Crossref]
7. Habermas Jurgen The Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere 1999 Shanghai Xuelin Press
8. Habermas Jurgen Legitimation Crisis 2009 Shanghai Shanghai Century Publishing (Group) Co., Ltd.
9. O’Brien R. , et al Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements 2000 Cambridge University Press [Crossref]
10. Rhodes R.A.W."“The New Governance: Governing without Governance”" Political Studies 1996Vol 44 [Crossref]
11. Rhodes R.A.W."“The Tools of Government: A Guide to the new Governance”" Public Administration 2005Vol 83 1 247 248
12. Shang Hupin"“Error and Correction of Result-oriented Government Performance Evaluation”" Cass Journal of Political Science 2015Vol 3
13. Wang Chunguang"“Study on the ‘Semi-urbanization’ of Rural Migrant Population”" Sociological Studies 2006Vol 5
14. Wang Chunting, Lan Yuxin"“The Elements, Types and Levels of Social Co-governance”" China Nonprofit Review 2015Vol 15
15. Wang Ming The 30 Years of Civil Organizations in China 2008 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press
16. Wang Ming , et al"“Social Co-governance: Practical Attempts and Institutional Innovations for Joint Governance of Multiple Parties”" Chinese Public Administration 2014Vol 12
17. Wang Shizong"“Internal Contradictions of the Governance Theory and Its Way Out”" Philosophical Researches 2008Vol 2
18. Yu Jianxing"“Applicability of Governance Theory in China”" Philosophical Researches 2010Vol 11
19. Yu Keping The Rise of the Civil Society and Evolution of Governance in China 2002 Beijing Social Sciences Academic Press
20. Yu Keping"“The Evolution of Governance in China Over 30 Years (1978-2008)”" Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition 2008Vol 3
21. Zhang Yi"“Social New Normal: The Emergence of Post-industrial Society and the Middle Class”" Jiangsu Social Sciences 2016Vol 1
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18765149-12341323
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18765149-12341323
2017-06-20
2017-11-18

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    The China Nonprofit Review — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation