Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

More Than a Tacit Alliance

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Trade, Soft Power, and U.S.-Chinese Rapprochement Reconsidered

image of Journal of American-East Asian Relations

It is well known that President Richard M. Nixon’s 1972 visit to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) established an anti-Soviet alliance between Beijing and Washington that reshaped the global Cold War power balance. Naturally, scholars have focused on strategic issues such as the Sino-Soviet split, the Vietnam War, Taiwan, and other factors of “high politics” to understand the U.S.-China rapprochement. However, one can no longer dismiss U.S.-PRC trade in the 1970s, albeit small in total volume, as insignificant and thus unimportant to the reconciliation. This article first examines how the Johnson and Nixon administrations conceived trade as a useful tool to improve relations with Communist China. It then explores how the Americans and Chinese carried out trade between themselves in the 1970s. It argues that many Americans were enthusiastic about U.S.-PRC trade because they believed that reopened economic relations with the United States would persuade the PRC to abandon its Communist model of modernization and move closer to following the capitalist example. If the United States could promote China’s attraction to its capitalist model for future development, then their shared economic interests and developmental visions would consolidate further the U.S.-China strategic alliance. In this sense, promoting trade was a way for the United States to apply soft power to change the PRC.

Affiliations: 1: Georgia Southern University, mlin@georgiasouthern.edu

10.1163/18765610-02401004
/content/journals/10.1163/18765610-02401004
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18765610-02401004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18765610-02401004
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18765610-02401004
2017-04-08
2018-02-24

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of American-East Asian Relations — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation