Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Preposition-possessum agreement and predication in possessive noun phrases

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics

This article discusses two relatively novel properties of possessive noun phrases in Arabic and explores their implications for existing analyses. First, in some dialects of Moroccan Arabic the genitive preposition shows agreement in number and gender with the possessum to its left in analytic (Free State) noun phrases. Preposition-possessum agreement appears to parallel verb-subject agreement and is to all intent and purposes an instance of predicate-subject agreement. Secondly, in many Arabic varieties inalienable noun phrases are incompatible with the analytic pattern and can only have the synthetic (Construct State) pattern. These two properties are difficult to accommodate under an analysis that assigns a uniform syntactic structure to both alienable and inalienable noun phrases, where the possessum is the head noun and the possessor is its specifier. Instead, they point to an analysis where the two types of noun phrases derive from radically different syntactic structures. While inalienable noun phrases derive from a structure where the inalienable possessum is the head noun and the possessor is its argument, alienable noun phrases derive from a structure along the lines outlined in Den Dikken (2006), where the possessum is the subject and the possessor a predicate complement, and the relationship between the two is necessarily mediated by a relational category that corresponds to the genitive preposition in the analytic pattern. A version of this analysis is adopted here that accounts for additional known properties of analytic and synthetic noun phrases, including their PF interface properties. The latter part builds on the analysis outlined in Ouhalla (2009b) and addresses questions left open there.

10.1163/187666311X562477
/content/journals/10.1163/187666311x562477
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187666311x562477
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187666311x562477
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187666311x562477
2011-09-01
2016-12-07

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation