Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

On issues of Arabic syntax: An essay in syntactic argumentation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

This review essay aims to present a range of syntactic facts from Arabic dialects as discussed in The Syntax of Arabic, provide an evaluative discussion of the authors' analyses of these facts, and, when needed, offer potential alternative accounts. More specifically, the essay focuses on a number of syntactic phenomena as varied as clause structure, word order alternation, the subject-verb agreement asymmetry, patterns of sentential negation, strategies for wh-question-formation, as well as their implications for general linguistic analysis. It is hoped that this review represents an example of the kind of syntactic argumentation and debate expected to be engendered by The Syntax of Arabic, and as such contributes to the ongoing research agenda on issues of Arabic syntax, which should be of empirical and theoretical value not only to Arabic linguists, but to typologists and syntacticians at large.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation