Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of Causal Connectives and Relations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Causality is one of the most frequent coherence relations linking sentences together within texts and discourses, and mastering them is an essential part of acquiring a language. In this paper, we investigate the way French- and Dutch-speaking children acquire these relations depending on the way they are encoded in their mother tongue. From a cross-linguistic perspective, important differences exist in the communication of causal relations. While in some languages like Dutch, objective relations linking causes with consequences and subjective relations linking claims and conclusions are prototypically conveyed by a specific connective, in others like English and spoken French, a single connective is used in both cases. In this paper, we study the impact of these cross-linguistic differences for children’s ability to understand causal relations in a text. Our results indicate that French- and Dutch-speaking children have a similar ability to handle objective and subjective causal relations. In addition, subjective relations remain more difficult than objective relations even at the age of eight. We conclude that conceptual development sets the pace for lexical acquisition and discuss the causes for the acute difficulty of subjective relations.

Affiliations: 1: University of Fribourg, Switzerland Sandrine.Zufferey@unifr.ch ; 2: Utrecht University, The Netherlands w.m.mak@uu.nl ; 3: Utrecht University, The Netherlands T.J.M.Sanders@uu.nl

10.1163/18773109-00701002
/content/journals/10.1163/18773109-00701002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18773109-00701002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/18773109-00701002
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/18773109-00701002
2015-01-01
2018-04-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Review of Pragmatics — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation