Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Statistical Significance Testing with Mahalanobis Distance for Thresholds Estimated from Constant Stimuli Method

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites

image of Seeing and Perceiving
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Spatial Vision.

The t-test and the analysis of variance are commonly used as statistical significance testing methods. However, they cannot assess the significance of differences between thresholds within individual observers estimated from the constant stimuli method; these thresholds are not defined as averages of samples, but they are rather defined as functions of parameters of psychometric functions fitted to participants' responses. Moreover, the statistics necessary for these statistical testing methods cannot be derived. In this paper, we propose a new statistical testing method to assess the statistical significance of differences between thresholds estimated from the constant stimuli method. The new method can assess not only threshold differences but also main effects and interactions in multifactor experiments, exploiting the asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators and the characteristics of multivariate normal distributions. This proposed method could be used in similar cases to the analysis of variance for thresholds estimated from the adjustment method and the staircase method. Finally, we present some data on simulations in which we tested assumptions, power and type I error of the proposed method.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Information Processing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259- G2-1 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, 1-1 Hibarigaoka Tenpaku, Toyohashi, Aichi 441-8580, Japan;, Email: nagai@tut.jp; 2: Graduate School of Economics, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan; 3: Department of Information Processing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259- G2-1 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502, Japan

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187847511x568180
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187847511x568180
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187847511x568180
2011-04-01
2016-10-01

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation