Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Temporal processing of self-motion: Translations are processed slower than rotations

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Temporal processing of self-motion: Translations are processed slower than rotations

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Seeing and Perceiving
For more content, see Multisensory Research and Spatial Vision.

Reaction times (RTs) to purely inertial self-motion stimuli have only infrequently been studied, and comparisons of RTs for translations and rotations, to our knowledge, are nonexistent. We recently proposed a model (Soyka et al., 2011) which describes direction discrimination thresholds for rotational and translational motions based on the dynamics of the vestibular sensory organs (otoliths and semi-circular canals). This model also predicts differences in RTs for different motion profiles (e.g., trapezoidal versus triangular acceleration profiles or varying profile durations). In order to assess these predictions we measured RTs in 20 participants for 8 supra-threshold motion profiles (4 translations, 4 rotations). A two-alternative forced-choice task, discriminating leftward from rightward motions, was used and 30 correct responses per condition were evaluated. The results agree with predictions for RT differences between motion profiles as derived from previously identified model parameters from threshold measurements. To describe absolute RT, a constant is added to the predictions representing both the discrimination process, and the time needed to press the response button. This constant is approximately 160 ms shorter for rotations, thus indicating that additional processing time is required for translational motion. As this additional latency cannot be explained by our model based on the dynamics of the sensory organs, we speculate that it originates at a later stage, e.g., during tilt-translation disambiguation. Varying processing latencies for different self-motion stimuli (either translations or rotations) which our model can account for must be considered when assessing the perceived timing of vestibular stimulation in comparison with other senses (Barnett-Cowan and Harris, 2009; Sanders et al., 2011).

Affiliations: 1: 1Department of Human Perception, Cognition and Action, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, DE

Reaction times (RTs) to purely inertial self-motion stimuli have only infrequently been studied, and comparisons of RTs for translations and rotations, to our knowledge, are nonexistent. We recently proposed a model (Soyka et al., 2011) which describes direction discrimination thresholds for rotational and translational motions based on the dynamics of the vestibular sensory organs (otoliths and semi-circular canals). This model also predicts differences in RTs for different motion profiles (e.g., trapezoidal versus triangular acceleration profiles or varying profile durations). In order to assess these predictions we measured RTs in 20 participants for 8 supra-threshold motion profiles (4 translations, 4 rotations). A two-alternative forced-choice task, discriminating leftward from rightward motions, was used and 30 correct responses per condition were evaluated. The results agree with predictions for RT differences between motion profiles as derived from previously identified model parameters from threshold measurements. To describe absolute RT, a constant is added to the predictions representing both the discrimination process, and the time needed to press the response button. This constant is approximately 160 ms shorter for rotations, thus indicating that additional processing time is required for translational motion. As this additional latency cannot be explained by our model based on the dynamics of the sensory organs, we speculate that it originates at a later stage, e.g., during tilt-translation disambiguation. Varying processing latencies for different self-motion stimuli (either translations or rotations) which our model can account for must be considered when assessing the perceived timing of vestibular stimulation in comparison with other senses (Barnett-Cowan and Harris, 2009; Sanders et al., 2011).

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/18784763/25/0/18784763_025_00_S194_text.html;jsessionid=F8SVii5lHMoAeKqS12KAnAbm.x-brill-live-02?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/187847612x648369&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/187847612x648369
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Barnett-Cowan M. , Harris L. R. ( 2009). "Perceived timing of vestibular stimulation relative to touch, light and sound", Experimental Brain Research Vol 198, 221231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1779-4
2. Sanders M. C. , Chang N. N. , Hiss M. M. , Uchanski R. M. , Hullar T. E. ( 2011). "Temporal binding of auditory and rotational stimuli", Experimental Brain Research Vol 210, 539547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2554-x
3. Soyka F. , Giordano P. R. , Beykirch K. A. , Bülthoff H. H. ( 2011). "Predicting direction detection thresholds for arbitrary translational acceleration profiles in the horizontal plane", Experimental Brain Research Vol 209, 95107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2523-9
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/187847612x648369
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/187847612x648369
2012-01-01
2016-12-11

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation