Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

DISTRIBUTIONAL ECOLOGY OF AMPHIPODS AND TANAIDACEANS ASSOCIATED WITH THREE SEA GRASS SPECIES

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Crustacean Biology

ABSTRACT A one-year survey of amphipods and tanaidaceans associated with monospecific sea grass meadows and a bare sand substratum, under similar physical-chemical conditions, showed that the magnozosterid Thalassia testudinum supported higher numbers of peracarids per square meter than the parvozosterid Halodule wrightii and the bare sand substratum as predicted by Kikuchi and Peres (1977). However, when examined in terms of numbers of individuals per unit sea grass biomass or surface area, Thalassia and Halodule supported nearly equal numbers of epifauna. Syringodium filiforme, a syringodiid, consistently supported highest surface area-standardized abundances of epifauna. The previously reported significance of sea grass biomass in structuring crustacean assemblages held within, but not across, sea grass species. Although the amphipods and tanaids showed no species-specific association with sea grasses, the relative abundance of crustaceans was a function of both sea grass species and biomass. Relative abundance of infaunal types decreased from bare sand to Halodule to Syringodium to Thalassia sites and from low to high biomass sites. The abundance of peracarid crustaceans on sea grass meadows is a complex function of sea grass growth form and biomass which appear to mediate the distribution and foraging behavior of important predators.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/193724083x00184
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/193724083x00184
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/193724083x00184
1983-01-01
2016-12-02

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Crustacean Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation