Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY OF CYPRIS LARVAE OF BALANUS AMPHITRITE (CIRRIPEDIA: THORACICA: BALANOMORPHA)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Crustacean Biology

ABSTRACT We describe the external morphology of the cypris larvae of Balanus amphitrite Darwin using scanning electron microscopy. The cyprid of B. amphitrite generally resembles that of Semibalanus balanoides, but differs in a number of morphological details. Cyprids of B. amphitrite carry fewer pores and setae on the carapace than Semibalanus balanoides. We found minor but consistent differences in morphology of the antennules and the caudal rami. The latter are 2-segmented and carry 6 setae. The thoracopods exhibit the most significant differences. The endopods and exopods are both 2-segmented, but with indications of an ancestral division into three segments in the endopod. The endopod carries a single plumose seta on the proximal segment and 3 plumose setae on the distal segment. In thoracopod 1, the exopod carries a short, sickle-shaped seta laterally on the proximal segment and on the distal segment 3 plumose setae and a single biserrate seta. Thoracopods 2-6 have an additional plumose seta on the distal segment. We emphasize the insufficiency of most existing descriptions and that only scanning electron microscopy allows the level of morphological detail needed for future comparative studies on cyprid morphology.

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/193724095x00514
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/193724095x00514
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/193724095x00514
1995-01-01
2016-12-09

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Crustacean Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation