Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Are two parents better than one? Examining the effects of biparental care on parental and egg clutch mass in the stomatopod Pullosquilla thomassini (Manning, 1978)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Among marine crustaceans, biparental care has only been directly observed in the stomatopod genus Pullosquilla. This study investigated the evolutionary maintenance of biparental care in Pullosquilla thomassini (Manning, 1978) by examining fitness costs and benefits of biparental care using a manipulation of the number and sex of care providers. In the absence of parental care, egg clutch mass decreased. However, in the presence of at least one parent, there were no changes in clutch mass during the experiment. This suggests that while parental care increases production of offspring, uniparental care by either sex is sufficient. We suggest that biparental care may increase fitness in P. thomassini by facilitating the production of overlapping egg clutches. We found evidence that males providing uniparental care lost body mass, suggesting they pay a small cost in fitness. However, single males with eggs were rare at our field site (3.93% of burrows).

Affiliations: 1: Department of Integrative Biology, 3060 VLSB, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

10.1163/1937240X-00002302
/content/journals/10.1163/1937240x-00002302
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1937240x-00002302
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ahyong S. T. 2001. "Revision of the Australian stomatopod Crustacea". Records of the Australian Museum, Supplement Vol 26: 1- 326. [Crossref]
2. Alonzo S. H. , Klug H. . 2012. "Paternity, maternity, and parental care", pp.  189- 205. In, Royle N. J. , Smiseth P. T. , Kolliker M. (eds.), The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Crossref]
3. Audouin V. 1826. "Explication sommaire des planches de crustaces de l’Egypte et de la Syrie, publiées par Jules-Cesar Savigny, member de l’Inst.; offrant un exposé des caractères naturels des genres avec la distinction des espèces. Description de l’Egypte". Histoire Naturelle Vol 1: 477- 498. Paris.
4. Burley N. T. , Johnson K. . 2002. "The evolution of avian parental care". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences Vol 357: 241- 250. [Crossref]
5. Caldwell R. L. 1991. "Variation in reproductive behavior in stomatopod Crustacea", pp.  67- 90. In, Bauer R. T. , Martin J. W. (eds.), Crustacean Sexual Biology. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
6. Christy J. H. , Salmon M. . 1991. "Comparative studies of reproductive behavior in mantis shrimps and fiddler crabs". American Zoologist Vol 31: 329- 337.
7. Cockburn A. 2006. "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds". Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences Vol 273: 1375- 1383. [Crossref]
8. Correa C. , Thiel M. . 2003. "Mating systems in caridean shrimp (Decapoda: Caridea) and their evolutionary consequences for sexual dimorphism and reproductive biology". Revista Chilena de Historia Natural Vol 76: 187- 203. [Crossref]
9. Detto T. , Backwell P. R. . 2009. "Social monogamy in a fiddler crab, Uca capricornis ". Journal of Crustacean Biology Vol 29: 283- 289. [Crossref]
10. Duffy J. E. , Macdonald K. S. . 2010. "Kin structure, ecology and the evolution of social organization in shrimp: a comparative analysis". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Vol 277: 575- 584. [Crossref]
11. Emlen S. T. , Oring L. W. . 1977. "Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems". Science Vol 19: 215- 223. [Crossref]
12. Fabricius J. C. 1793. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species. Adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus, 2: vii and 519 pp. Copenhagen.
13. Goodwin N. B. , Balshine-Earn S. , Reynolds J. D. . 1998. "Evolutionary transitions in parental care in cichlid fish". Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B: Biological Sciences Vol 265: 2265- 2272. [Crossref]
14. Harrison F. , Barta Z. , Cuthill I. , Szekely T. . 2009. "How is sexual conflict over parental care resolved? A meta-analysis". Journal of Evolutionary Biology Vol 22: 1800- 1812. [Crossref]
15. Hunt J. , Simmons L. W. . 2002. "Behavioural dynamics of biparental care in the dung beetle Othophagus taurus ". Animal Behaviour Vol 64: 65- 75. [Crossref]
16. Jutte P. A. 1997. The ecology, behavior, and visual systems of Pullosquilla litoralisand P. thomassini, two monogamous species of stomatopod crustacean. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
17. Kleiman D. G. , Malcolm J. R. . 1981. "The evolution of male parental investment in mammals", pp.  347- 387. In, Gubernick D. J. , Klopfer P. H. (eds.), Parental Care in Mammals. Plenum, New York, NY. [Crossref]
18. Lack D. 1968. Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. Methuen, London.
19. Lessells C. M. 2006. "The evolutionary outcome of sexual conflict". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences Vol 361: 301- 317. [Crossref]
20. Lindstrom K. S. 2003. Aspects of the behavior, population genetics, and phylogeny of stomatopod crustaceans. Doctoral Dissertation, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
21. Linsenmair K. E. 2007. "Sociobiology of terrestrial isopods", pp.  339- 364. In, Duffy J. E. , Thiel M. (eds.), Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. [Crossref]
22. Mank J. E. , Promislow D. E. L. , Avise J. C. . 2005. "Phylogenetic perspectives in the evolution of parental care in ray-finned fishes". Evolution Vol 59: 1570- 1578. [Crossref]
23. Manning R. B. 1978. New and Rare Stomatopod Crustacea from the Indo-West-Pacific Region. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
24. Maynard Smith J. 1976. "Evolution and the theory of games". American Scientist Vol 6: 41- 45.
25. Maynard Smith J. . 1977. "Parental investment: a prospective analysis". Animal Behaviour Vol 25: 1- 9. [Crossref]
26. Michel A. , Manning R. B. . 1971. "A new Austrosquilla (Stomatopoda) from the Marquesas Islands". Crustaceana Vol 20: 237- 240. [Crossref]
27. Parker G. A. 1979. "Sexual selection and sexual conflict", pp.  123- 166. In, Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic Press, New York, NY. [Crossref]
28. Pinheiro J. , Bates D. , DebRoy S. , Sarkar D. , and the R Development Core Team. 2013. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-108. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, avaiable online at .
29. R Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, avaiable online at .
30. Rasband W. S. 1997-2012. ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, available online at .
31. Reynolds J. D. , Goodwin N. B. , Freckleton R. P. . 2002. "Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences Vol 357: 269- 281. [Crossref]
32. Smiseth P. T. , Dawson C. , Varley E. , Moore A. J. . 2005. "How do caring parents respond to mate loss? Differential response by males and females". Animal Behaviour Vol 69: 551- 559. [Crossref]
33. Thiel M. 2000. "Extended parental care behavior in crustaceans – a comparative overview". Crustacean Issues Vol 12: 211- 226.
34. Thiel M. . 2003. "Extended parental care in crustaceans – an update". Revista Chilena de Historia Natural Vol 76: 205- 218.
35. Trivers R. L. 1972. "Parental investment and sexual selection", pp.  139- 179. In, Campbell B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971. Aldine, Chicago, IL.
36. Trumbo S. T. 2012. "Patterns of parental care in invertebrates", pp.  81- 100. In, Royle N. J. , Smiseth P. T. , Kolliker M. (eds.), The Evolution of Parental Care. Oxford University Press, Oxford. [Crossref]
37. Wickler W. , Seibt U. . 1981. "Monogamy in Crustacea and man". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie Vol 57: 215- 234. [Crossref]
38. Zuur A. F. , Ieno E. N. , Walker N. , Saveliev A. A. , Smith G. M. . 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. Springer, New York, NY. [Crossref]
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/1937240x-00002302
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/1937240x-00002302
2017-11-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation