Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

John H. McWhorter. 2011. Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. 338 pp.

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Language Contact

This review article consists of three parts: a presentation of McWhorter’s book, an evaluation of the book, and a proposal for a systematic metric for one version of the notions of simplicity and complexity in languages. McWhorter’s basic thesis, that creoles have simpler grammars than their lexifier languages and simpler grammars than languages transmitted through acquisition in childhood, must begin with rigorous definitions of the terms ‘simplicity’ and ‘complexity’. The paper proposes a way to measure simplicity and complexity. Whether the notions of simplicity or complexity have a heuristic value remains an open question.

Affiliations: 1: University of Colorado, Email: Zygmunt.Frajzyngier@Colorado.Edu

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00502004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Ansaldo Umberto,, Matthews Stephen,, and Lim Lisa (eds.). 2007. Deconstructing creole. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Booij Geert,. 1993. "Against split morphology". In Booij Geert, and van Marle Jaap (eds.), Yearbook of morphology. 1993. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2749.
3. COCA THE CORPUS OF CONTEMPORARYAMERICAN ENGLISH http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/
4. Frajzyngier Zygmunt.1996. Grammaticalization of the complex sentence: A case study in Chadic. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
5. Frajzyngier Zygmunt. 2008. A grammar of Gidar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
6. Frajzyngier Zygmunt. 2011. "Les fonctions de l’ordre linéaire des constituants". Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 737.
7. Keesing Roger M.1985. Kwaio grammar. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
8. Kihm Alain. 2003. "Inflectional categories in creole languages". In Plag Vol 2003, 333363.
9. Plag Ingo (ed.). 2003. Phonology and morphology of the creole languages. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
10. van der Auwera Johan,, and Genee Inge. 2002. "English do: On the convergence of languages and linguists". English Language and Linguistics Vol 6: 283307.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00502004
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00502004
2012-01-01
2016-12-08

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Language Contact — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation