Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Open Access The Independent Partitive as an Eastern Circum-Baltic isogloss

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

The Independent Partitive as an Eastern Circum-Baltic isogloss

  • PDF
  • HTML
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The paper claims that the independent partitive case in Finnic languages and the independent partitive genitive case in Baltic and East Slavic (henceforth: ip(g)) show considerable correlations that cannot be accounted for but by language contact. Given that both the ip(g) in Baltic and East Slavic as well as the ip(g) in Finnic are inherited from the respective proto-languages, the paper also offers a methodological discussion of how inherited categories may also be shown to be subject to language contact. A typologically not infrequent category must be individualized on the basis of a list of properties. Thus, 13 semantic and 5 morphosyntactic properties have been discussed. While the study reveals that in general the ip(g) is or was subject to intensive language contact, there is no common hotbed for all properties analysed and different properties have different hotbeds and are distinct with respect to their geographical distribution and entrenchment. North Russian and Finnic show the greatest degree of correspondence as, e.g., the aspectuality related functions of the ip(g) or the morphological distinction between the possession (sensu lato) and the partitive-related functions are concerned. Here, Finnic is the donor language. However, other properties such as the semantic and syntactic merger of the acc and ip(g) marking must have spread from Russian to Finnic and, to some extent, Baltic. Similarly, the genitive/partitive-under-negation probably developed first in Baltic and Slavic and spread then into Finnic, since preconditions for this rule are already found in the ancient Indo-European languages. Finnic, however, preserves this rule best.

Affiliations: 1: Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, TriMCo serzant@web.de

The paper claims that the independent partitive case in Finnic languages and the independent partitive genitive case in Baltic and East Slavic (henceforth: ip(g)) show considerable correlations that cannot be accounted for but by language contact. Given that both the ip(g) in Baltic and East Slavic as well as the ip(g) in Finnic are inherited from the respective proto-languages, the paper also offers a methodological discussion of how inherited categories may also be shown to be subject to language contact. A typologically not infrequent category must be individualized on the basis of a list of properties. Thus, 13 semantic and 5 morphosyntactic properties have been discussed. While the study reveals that in general the ip(g) is or was subject to intensive language contact, there is no common hotbed for all properties analysed and different properties have different hotbeds and are distinct with respect to their geographical distribution and entrenchment. North Russian and Finnic show the greatest degree of correspondence as, e.g., the aspectuality related functions of the ip(g) or the morphological distinction between the possession (sensu lato) and the partitive-related functions are concerned. Here, Finnic is the donor language. However, other properties such as the semantic and syntactic merger of the acc and ip(g) marking must have spread from Russian to Finnic and, to some extent, Baltic. Similarly, the genitive/partitive-under-negation probably developed first in Baltic and Slavic and spread then into Finnic, since preconditions for this rule are already found in the ancient Indo-European languages. Finnic, however, preserves this rule best.

Loading

Full text loading...

/deliver/journals/19552629/8/2/19552629_008_02_S006_text.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00802006&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00802006
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Adamec Przemyśl . 1965. "K voprosu o transformacionnom analize predloženij bez nominativa i s nejadernym nominativom v sovremennom russkom jazyke". Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Philologica I Slavica Pragensia Vol 7: 6378.
2. Adamovičiūtė and Čekman 1984. "Irena El’žbeta Adomavičjute, Valerij N. Čekman. Grammatičeskie lituanizmy v pol’skix periferijnyx govorax belorussko-litovskogo pogranič’ja". In Regier Janusz ,and Werenicz Wiaczesław (eds.), Studia nad polszczyzną kresową.Tom iiI, 7–22. Wrocław / Warszawa / Kraków: Zakład narodowy im. ossolińskich. Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
3. Alho Irja H. 1992. "Distinguishing kind and set in Finnish", Studies in the Linguistic Science Vol 22( 1): 114.
4. Ambrazas Vytautas ,, Dumašiūtė Z. ,, Juodelytė D. ,, P. Kniūkšta, Labutis V. , … 1976. Lietuvių kalbos gramatika . III tomas. Sintaksė. Vilnius: Mokslas.
5. Ambrazas Vytautas ,, Garšva K. ,, Girdenis A. ,, Jakaitienė E. ,, P. Kniūkšta, Krinickaitė S. ,, Labutis V. ,, Laigonaitė A. , … 2006. Dabartinės lietuvių kalbos gramatika. A Grammar of Modern Lithuanian . Vilnius: Lietuvių kalbos institutas.
6. Arkadiev Peter M. 2011a. Aspect and actionality in Lithuanian on a typological background. In Petit, Daniel, Claire Le Feuvre et Henri Menantaud (éds.) Langues baltiques, langues slaves, 61–92. Paris: CNRS Editions.
7. Arkadiev Peter M. 2011b. "Problemy sintaksisa konstrukcij «accusativus cum participio» v litovskom jazyke", Voprosy Jazykoznanija 2011b( 5): 4475.
8. Arkadiev Peter M. , 2012. "Participial complementation in Lithuanian". In Gast Volker ,and Diessel Holger (eds.), Clause Linkage in Cross-Linguistic Perspective: Data-Driven Approaches to Cross-Clausal Syntax (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs), 285334. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Babby Leonard H . 1978. Negation and Subject Case Selection in Existential Sentences: Evidence From Russian . Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club[Papers 81:1].
10. Barwise Jon ,and Cooper Robin . 1981. "Generalized quantifiers and natural language". Linguistics and Philosophy Vol 4: 159219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00350139
11. Bauer Brigitte ,. 2007. "The definite article in Indo-European: emergence of a new grammatical category?"In Stark Elisabeth ,, Leiss Elisabeth ,and Werner Abraham (eds.), Nominal Determination: Typology, Context, Constraints, and Historical Emergence , 103139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
12. Berg-Olsen Sturla . 1999. A Syntactic Change in Progress: The Decline in the use of the Non-prepositional Genitive in Latvian, with a Comparative View on Lithuanian . Oslo: University of Oslo, Department of East-European and Oriental Studies.
13. Bertinetto Pier Marco . 1997. Il domino tempo-aspecttuale: Demarcazioni, intersezioni, constrasti . Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
14. Bjarnadóttir Valgerður ,& De Smit Merlijn . 2013. "Primary argument case-marking in Baltic and Finnic". Baltu Filoloģija xxii(1): 3166.
15. Blake Barry J. 1994. Case . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second edition.
16. Borschev Vladimir ,, Paducheva Elena V. ,, Partee Barbara H. ,, Yakov G ,. Testelets and Yanovich Igor , 2007. "Russian Genitives, Non-Referentiality, and the Property-Type Hypothesis". In Antonenko Andrei ,, Bailyn John F. ,and Bethin Christina (eds.), Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Stony Brook Meeting 2007( fasl16). Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 4867. url: .
17. Brattico Pauly . 2011. "Case assignment, case concord, and the quantificational case construction", Lingua Vol 121: 10421066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.004
18. Breu Walter . 1994. "Der Faktor Sprachkontakt in einer dynamischen Typologie des Slavischen". In Mehlig, Hans Robert (ed.), Slavistische Linguistik1993. Referate des xiX. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Kiel 21 . - 23.9.1993, 4164. München: Sagner.
19. Brown Sue . 1996. The Syntaxof Negation in Russian. A Minimalist Approach. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
20. Brown Sue ,and Franks Steven . 1995. "Asymmetries in the Scope of Russian Negation". Journal of Slavic Linguistics Vol 3( 2): 239287.
21. Brugmann Karl ,and Delbrück Berthold . 1893. Grundriss der Vergleichenden Grammatik der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Dritter Band. Erster Theil. Strassburg: Karl J. Trübner.
22. Bukšs Miķelis ,and Placinskis Jurs . 1973. Latgaļu volūdas gramatika un pareizraksteibas vōrdneica . Otrais izdevums. München: Latgalischer Verlag.
23. Bybee Joan ,. 2003. "Mechanisms of change in grammaticization". In Joseph Bryan ,and Janda Richard D. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics , 60223. Malden, Mass: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch19
24. Campbell Lyle ,. 1990. "Syntactic reconstruction and Finno-Ugric". In Andersen Henning ,and Koerner Konrad (eds.), Historical Linguistics: Papers from the Eighth International Conference on Historical Linguistics , 5194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Conti Luz ,and Luraghi Silvia . 2010. "The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological". A paper presented at the international workshop “Partitives” organized by Silvia Luraghi and Tuomas Huumo, hosted at the 40 of the slein Vilnius, 4 and 5 September 2010.
26. Corbett Greville ,. 1994. "Systems of grammatical number in Slavonic, Slavonic and East European Review72 (2): 201–217. A revised version of Systems of grammatical number in Slavonic", In Gil David (ed.), Studies in Number and Quantification. European Science Foundation Programme in Language Typology: Theme 7, Noun Phrase Structure: Working Paper no. vii/19: 1–17. Konstanz.
27. Corbett Greville . 2000. Numerals . Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge, uk / New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Corbett Greville 2006. Agreement . "Cambridge textbooks in linguistics". Cambridge, uk / New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Crockett Dina B. 1976. Agreement in Contemporary Standard Russian. Cambridge, ma: Slavica Publishers, Inc.
30. Croft William . 2003. Typology and Universals . Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. Cruse Alan . 2000. Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics . Oxford: oup.
32. Dahl Eystein ,. 2009. "Some semantic and pragmatic aspects of object alternation in Early Vedic". In Barðdal Jóhanna ,and Chelliah Shobhanna (eds.), The Role of Semantic, Pragmatic, and Discourse Factors in the Development of Case , 2338. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
33. Dahl Östen ,. 1981. "On the definition of the telic-atelic (bounded - unbounded) distinction". In Tedeschi Philip J. ,and Zaenen Annie (eds.), Syntax and Semantics , Vol. Vol 14: Tense and Aspect, 7990. New York: Academic Press.
34. Dahl Östen ,and Koptjevskaja-Tamm Maria (eds.). 2001. The Circum-Baltic Languages . Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
35. Daniel Michael ,. 2014. "The second genitive in Russian". In Luraghi Silvia ,and Huumo Tuomas (eds.), Partitive Cases and Related Categories [Empirical approaches to language typology 54]. 347378. Berlin; Boston, Mass.: DeGruyter.
36. Declerck Renaat . 1989. "Boundedness and the structure of situations", Leuvense Bijdragen Vol 78: 275308.
37. Declerck Renaat . 1991. A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English . Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
38. Depraetere Ilse . 1995. "On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity", Linguistics and Philosophy Vol 18( 1): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00984959
39. damb : Dyjalektalahičny atlas belaruskaj movy . Minsk: Akademija navuk Belaruskaja ssr. 1963.
40. Diesing Molly . 1992. Indefinites . Cambridge: mit-Press.
41. Dowty David ,and Brodie Belinda . 1984. "The semantics of ‟floated” quantifiers in a transformationless grammar". In Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics3. csli Publications, 7590.
42. Farkas Donka ,. 1995. "Specificity and scope". In Nash Léa ,and Tsoulas Georges (eds.), Actes du Premier Colloque Langues et Grammaire, 119–137. Paris: Garland.
43. Fedotova Viėno P . 1990. " Očerk sintaksisa karel’skogo jazyka. " Petrozavodsk. Karel’skij naučnyj centr an sssr.
44. Flier Michael ,. 1985. "The scope of prefixal delimitation in russian". In Flier Michael ,and Timberlake Aalan (eds.), The Scope of Slavic Aspect , 4158. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publ.
45. Franks Steven . 1995. Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax.Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax. NY / Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Filin, Fedot. P. 1972. Proisxoždenie russkogo, ukrainskogo i belorusskogo jazykov . Istoriko-dialektologičeskij očerk. Leningrad: Nauka.
47. Filip Hanna ,. 1989. "Aspectual properties of the an-construction in German". In Abraham Werner ,and Janssen Theo (eds.), Tempus – Aspekt - Modus. Die lexikalischen und grammatischen Formen in den germanischen Sprachen(Tense – Aspect - Mood. Lexical and Grammatical Forms in the Germanic Languages). Linguistische Arbeiten, Band 237, 259292. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
48. Gil David . 1993. "Nominal and verbal quantification", Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung Vol 46( 4): 275317.
49. Hakulinen Auli ,and Karlsson Fred . 1979. Nykysuomen lauseoppia.[Modern Finnish Syntax]. Helsinki: Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
50. Harris Alice C. ,and Campbell Lyle . 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective . Cambridge: CUP.
51. Heine Bernd ,, Claudi Ulrike ,and Hünnemeyer Friederike . 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52. Heine Bernd ,and Kuteva Tania . 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change . Cambridge. CUP.
53. Helasvuo Marja-Liisa ,. 1996. "A discourse perspective on the grammaticization of the partitive case in Finnish". In Haukioja Timo ,, Helasvuo Marja-Liisa ,and Kärkkäinen Elise (eds.), skyYearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland18, 7–35. Helsinki.
54. von Heusinger Klaus . 2002. "Specificity and definiteness in sentence and discourse structure". Journal of Semantics Vol 19: 245274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jos/19.3.245
55. von Heusinger Klaus ,and Kaiser Georg A. ,. 2007. "Differential object marking and the lexical semantics of verbs in Spanish". In Kaiser Georg A. ,and Leonetti Manuel (eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop “Definiteness, Specificity and Animacy in Ibero-Romance Languages” , 85110. Universität Konstanz (Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft. Arbeitspapier 122).
56. von Heusinger K. ,and Kaiser G. A. . 2011. "Affectedness and differential object marking in Spanish". Morphology Vol 21: 593617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11525-010-9177-y
57. von Heusinger K. ,and Kornfilt J. 2005. "The case of the direct object in Turkish: semantics, syntax and morphology". Turkic Languages Vol 9: 344.
58. Holvoet Axel . 1991. Transitivitiy and Clause Structure in Polish: A Study in Case Marking . Warszawa: Slawistyczny Osrodek Wydawniczy.
59. Holvoet Axel ,. 2001. "Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic". In Dahl Östen ,and Koptevskaja-Tamm Maria , Circum-Baltic Languages . Volume Vol 2: Grammar and Typology, 363390. [Studies in Language Companion Series]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
60. de Hoop Helen . 1997. "A semantic reanalysis of the partitive constraint", Lingua Vol 103( 2/3): 151174.
61. de Hoop Helen ,. 2003. "Partitivity". In Cheng Lisa ,and Rint Sybesma (eds.), The Second Glot International State-of-the-Article Book , 179212. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
62. Huumo Tuomas . 2010. "Nominal aspect, quantity, and time: the case of the Finnish object", Journal of Linguistics Vol 46: 83125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990223
63. Ickovič Viktor A. 1974. "Očerki sintaksičeskoj normy (Remarks on the syntactic norm)". In Zolotova, Galina A. (ed.), Sintasis i norma , 43106. Moscow: Nauka.
64. Iemmolo Giorgio . 2013. "Symmetric and asymmetric alternations in direct object encoding", stuf Vol 66( 4): 378403.
65. Ionin Tania ,, Ora Matushansky ,, Ruys E.G. ,, 2006: "Parts of speech: towards a unified semantics for partitives". In Davis Christopher ,, Deal Amy R. ,, Zabbal Youri (eds.), Proceedings of nels 36, 357–370. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
66. Itkonen Erkki . 1972. "Über das Objekt in den finnisch-wolgaischen Sprachen", Finnisch-ugrische Forschungen Vol 39: 153213.
67. Itkonen Erkki . 1973. "Zur Geschichte des Partitivs", Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen Vol 40: 278339.
68. Jablonskis Jonas . 1957. Rinktiniai raštai. I tomas. Vilnius: Valstybinė Politinės ir Mokslinės Literatūros Leidykla.
69. Jackendoff Ray . 1977. X-bar Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70. Jakobson Roman . 1936[1971]. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russische Kasus. In Selected Writings ii , 2371. The Hague: Mouton.
71. Johanson Lars ,. 2008. "Copying, conventionalization, grammaticalization". In Siemund Peter ,and Kintana Noemi (eds.), Language Contact and Contact Languages . Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism vol. Vol 7, 6179. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hsm.7.05joh
72. Kangasmaa-Minn Eeva ,. 1984. "Tense, aspect and aktionsarten in Finno-Ugrian". In de Groot Casper ,and Hannu Tommola (eds.), Aspect Bound. A Voyage into the Realm of Germanic, Slavonic and Finno-Ugrian Aspectology , 7796. Dordrecht: Foris Publ.
73. Karlsson Fred . 1987. Finnish Grammar . Translated by Andrew Chesterman. Porvoo/Helsinki/Juva: Werner Söderström Osakeyhtiö.
74. Karskij Evfimij F. 1956. Belorussy. Jazyk belorusskogo naroda.Vyp. 2. and Vyp. 3. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo ANSSR.
75. Keenan Edward L. ,and Paperno Denis ,. 2012. "Overview". In Keenan Edward L. ,and Paperno Denis (eds.), Handbook of Quantifiers in Natural Language, 941–950. Dordrecht: Springer.
76. Kiparsky Paul ,. 1998. "Partitive case and aspect". In: Butt Miriam ,and Wilhelm Geuder (eds.), The Projection of Arguments. Lexical and Compositional Factors , 265307. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
77. Klaas Birute ,. 1996. "Similarities in case marking of syntactic relations in Estonian and Lithuanian". In Erelt Matti (ed.), Estonian: Typological Studies iiI, 37–67. Tartu: Tartu University.
78. Klenin Emily . 1983. Animacy in Russian: A New Interpretation . Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers, Inc.
79. Kont Karl . 1963. Käändsõnaline objekt läänemeresoome keeltes.Keele ja kirjanduse instituudi uurimused ix . Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akad.
80. Koptjevskaja-Tamm Maria ,. 2001. "A piece of the cake and a cup of tea: partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions in the Circum-Baltic languages". In Dahl Östen ,and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), The Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact . Vol. 2. Grammar and Typology, 523568. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins.
81. Koptjevskaja-Tamm Maria ,. 2009. "A lot of grammar with a good portion of lexicon: towards a typology of partitive and pseudo-partitive nominal constructions". In Helmbrecht Johannes ,, Yoko Nishina ,, Yong-Min Shin ,, Skopeteas Stavros ,and Verhoeven Elisabeth (eds.), Form and Function in Language Research, 329–346. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
82. Koptjevskaja-Tamm Maria ,and Wälchli Bernhard ,. 2001. " The Circum-Baltic languages: an areal-typological approach ". In Dahl Östen ,and Koptjevskaja-Tamm Maria (eds.), Circum-Baltic Languages , Volume Vol 2, 615750. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
83. Kornfilt Jaklin ,and von Heusinger Klaus . 2009. Specificity and partitivity in some Altaic Languages. In Ryosuke Shibagaki and Reiko Vermeulen (eds.), mitWorking Papers in Linguistics ( mwpl)58 . Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Formal Altaic Linguistics ( wafl 5 ) , 19–40. Cambridge: mit.
84. Krifka Manfrd ,, Pelletier Francis Jeffry ,, Carlson Gregory N. ,, ter Meulen Alice ,, Link Godehard ,and Chierchia Gennaro ,. 1995. Genericity: an introduction. In Carlson Gregory N. ,and Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book , 1124. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Krys’ko Vadim B. 1994. Razvitie kategorii oduševlennosti v istorii russkogo jazyka . Moskva: Lyceum.
86. Krys’ko Vadim B. 1997. Istoričeskij sintaksis russkogo jazyka. Ob”ekt i perechodnost’ . Moskva: Azbukovnik.
87. Krys’ko Vadim B. 2006: Istoričeskij sintaksis russkogo jazyka. Ob”ekt i perexodnost’ . 2-e izdanie, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe. Moskva: Azbukovnik.
88. Kühner Raphael ,and Gerth Bernhard . 1955[1897]. Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache. Satzlehre. Erster Teil . 4te Auflage. Hannover: Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
89. Kuryłowicz Jerzy . 1964. The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European . Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
90. Kuryłowicz Jerzy ,. 1971. "Słowiański genetivus po negacij". In Urbańczyk Stanisław (ed.), Sesja naukowa międzynarodowej komisji budowy gramatycznej języków słowiańskich , 1114. Krakow: Polska Akad. Nauk. Oddzial w Krakowie.
91. Kuznecova A. M. , 1964: "Nekotorye voprosy upravlenija pristavočnyx glagolov v russkix, ukrainskix i belorusskix govorax". In Avanesov, Ruben I. (ed.), Voprosy dialektologii vostočnoslavjanskix jazykov . Moskva: Nauka.
92. Kuz’mina Irina B. 1993: Sintaksis russkix govorov v lingvogeografičeskom aspekte . Moskva: Nauka.
93. Kuz’mina Irina B. ,and Nemčenko Elena V. . 1964. "K voprosu o konstrukcijax s fomoj imenitel’nogo padeža imeni pri perexodnyx glagolax i pri predikativnyx narečijax v russkix govorax". In Avanesov, Ruben I. (ed.), Voprosy dialektologii vostočnoslavjanskix jazykov , 151175. Moskva: Nauka.
94. Laanest Arvo . 1982. Einführung in die ostseefinnischen Sprachen . Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
95. Ladusaw William A. 1982. "Semantic constraints on the English partitive construction". In Flickinger et al. (eds.), Proceedings of wccfl1, 231242. Stanford, CA: CISLI Publications.
96. Larjavaara Matti . 1991. Aspektuaalisen objektin synty, Virittäjä Vol 95: 372408. [The origin of the aspectual object].
97. Larsson Lars-Gunnar . 1983. Studien zum Partitivgebrauch in den ostseefinnischen Sprachen. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Uralica et Altaica Upsaliensia 15. Uppsala: Borgströms Tryckeri AB.
98. Leikuma Lidija . 2010. Par dažiem Latgales latviešu folkloras pieraksta jautājumiem: lettische Volkslieder (1869), Baltu filoloģija xiX(1/2): 5370.
99. Löbner Sebastian . 1985. Natürlichsprachliche Quantoren – Zur Verallgemeinerung des Begriffs der Quantifikation, Studium Linguistik Vol 17/ 18: 79113.
100. Luraghi Silvia . 2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek . SLCS. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
101. Lopatina L. E. 1998: "Roditel’nyj padež v funkcii prjamogo ob”ekta", Vostočnoslavjanskie izoglossy Vol 2: 234244.
102. Malchukov Andrej . 2008. "Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking", Lingua Vol 118: 203221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.005
103. Malyševa Anna ,. 2004. "Roditel’nyj padež prjamogo dopolnenija ob”ekta pri glagolax nesoveršennogo vida v russkix letopisjax i sovremennyx arxangel’skix govorax". In Kasatkin Leonid L. (ed.), Materialy i issledovanija po russkoj dialektologii ii( viii) , 170184. Moskva: Nauka.
104. Malyševa Anna ,. 2008. "Tipy upotreblenija količestvennogo genetiva isčisljaemyx suščestvitel’nyx (na materiale sovremennyx arxangel’skix govorov i russkix letopisej)". In Kasatkin Leonid L. (ed.), Materialy i issledovanija po russkoj dialektologii iiI( ix), V. Grammatika, 232247. Moskva: Nauka.
105. Malyševa Anna . 2010. Iz istorii russkogo glagol’nogo upravlenija: ob”ektnyj genetiv . Dissertation. Ms. Institut Russkogo Jazyka.
106. Markova Nina . 1988. "Roditel’nyj padež prjamogo objekta v russkom fol’klore Karelii". Jazyk russkogo fol’klora . Petrozavodsk. Vol 96–104.
107. Markova Nina . 1991. "Roditel’nyj padež sub”ekta v onežskix govorax". In Azarx, Julia S. (ed.), Sovremennye russkie govory, 13441. Moskva: Nauka.
108. Markova Nina . 1999. "Glagol’nye konstrukcii s padežom polnogo objektivirovanija v onežskix govorax", Severno-Russkie govory Vol 7: 102109.
109. Markova Nina . 2008. "Glagol’nye konstrukcii s roditel’nym padežom ob”ekta i sub”ekta v onežskix govorax", Severno-Russkie govory Vol 9: 146155.
110. Markus Elena B. ,and Rozhanskij Fedor I. . 2011. Sovremennyj vodskij jazyk . Teksty i grammatičeskij očerk. Tom II. St.Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija.
111. Mathiassen Terje . 1985. "A discussion of the notion ‘sprachbund’ and its application in the case of the languages in the eastern Baltic area", International Journal of Slavic Philology Vol 21/ 22: 273281.
112. Franz Miklosich . 1926[1875]: Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen . Heidelberg: Winter. [Manulneudr. der Erstausg. von 1875].
113. Mehlig Hans Robert . 2006. Glagol’nyj vid i vtoričnaja gomogenizacija oboznačaemoj situacii: K upotrebleniju delimitativnogo sposoba dejstvija v russkom jazyke. In Lehmann, Volkmar, Glagol’nyj vid i leksikografija: semantika i struktura slavjanskogo vida4, 235–76. München: Sagner.
114. Meščerskij Nikita A. (ed.). 1972. Russkaja Dialektologija . Moskva: Vysšaja Škola.
115. Metslang Helle ,. 2001. On the developments of the Estonian aspect. The verbal particle ära. In: Dahl Östen ,and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic Languages . Volume 2: Grammar and Typology, 443481. [Studies in Language Companion Series]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
116. Moravcsik Edith A. 1978. "On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns", Lingua Vol 45( 1): 233279.
117. Nachmanson Ernst . 1942. Partitives Subjekt im Griechischen , Göteborg: Elander.
118. Nau Nicole ,. 1996. Ein Beitrag zur Arealtypologie der Ostseeanrainersprachen. In Boretzky ,, Norbert (ed.), Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte, Sprachen und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen , 51–67. Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, Bd. 24. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
119. Nau Nicole . 2014. Differential object marking in Latgalian. In Holvoet, Axel and Nicole Nau (eds.), Grammatical Relations and Their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic . [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1] , 207255. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
120. Napoli Maria . 2010. "The case for the partitive case: the contribution of Ancient Greek", Transactions of the Philological Society Vol 108[ 1]: 1540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-968X.2009.01219.x
121. Neidle Carol . 1988. The Role of Case in Russian Syntax: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
122. Paducheva, Elena. V. 1998. "On non-compatibility of partitive and imperfective in Russian", Theoretical Linguistics Vol 24( 1): 7382.
123. Partee Barbara H. , 1995. "Quantificational structures and compositionality". In Bach Emmon ,, Jelinek Eloise ,, Kratzer Angelika ,and Partee Barbara H. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages, 541–601. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
124. Partee Barbara H. , 2008. "Negation, intensionality, and aspect: Interaction with npsemantics". In Rothstein Susan (ed.), Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of AspectV. Vol 110, 291317. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins. (manuscript (final): ). http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/la.110.12par
125. Paykin Katia , 2014: "Russian partitives and verbal aspect". In Luraghi ,, Silvia ,and Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Partitive case and related categories . [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 54]. 379398. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
126. Quine Willard van Orman . 1960. Word and Object . Cambridge, Mass.: Tech. Press of MIT.
127. Reed Ann M. , 1989. "Discourse groups and semantic groups". In Powers Joyce (ed.), Proceedings of the 5 th Eastern States Conference on Linguistics ( escol’88), 416427. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ.
128. Sands Krishna ,and Campbell Lyle , 2001. "Non-canonical subjects and objects in Finnish". In Aikhenvald Alexandra Y. ,, Robert M.W. Dixon ,and Masayuki Onishi (eds.), Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects . John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
129. Sarhimaa Anneli . 1992. "Karelian Sprachbund?" Theoretical basis of the study of Russian/Baltic-Finnic contacts, Finnisch-Ugrische Forschungen Vol 50: 209219.
130. Sasse Hans-Jürgen . 2002. "Recent activity in the theory of aspect: Accomplishments, achievements, or just non-progressive state?", Linguistic Typology Vol 6: 199271.
131. Schwyzer Eduard ,and Debrunner Albert . 1950. Griechische Grammatik. Auf der Grundlage von Karl Brugmanns Griechische Grammatik. Zweiter Band. Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. Vervollständigt und herausgegeben von A. Debrunner. München: C. H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
132. Selkirk Elisabeth O. , 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Culicover Peter W. , Thomas Wasow ,and Adrian Akmajian , Formal Syntax: Papers from the mssb- ucIrvine Conference on the Formal Syntax of Natural Language , Newport Beach, California, June 9–11, 1976, 285316. New York: Academic Press.
133. Seržant Iilja A. 2012a. "Pragmatics and semantics of the bare partitive genitive in Ancient Greek", Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung Vol 65( 2): 113136.
134. Seržant Ilja A. 2012b. "Morphosyntactic properties of the partitive genitive in Ancient Greek", Indogermanische Forschungen Vol 117: 187204.
135. Seržant Ilja A. 2013. "The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects". In Seržant, Ilja A. and Leonid Kulikov (eds.), The Diachrony of Non-Canonical Subjects , 313360. slcs140. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
136. Seržant Ilja A. , 2014a. "Denotational properties of the independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian". In Holvoet Axel ,and Nau Nicole (eds.), Grammatical Relations and their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic , 257299. [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 1]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
137. Seržant Ilja A. , 2014b. Independent (bare) partitive genitive in Russian and North Russian. In Seržant Ilja A. ,and Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Dialectology: The area of North, Northwest Russian and Belarusian subdialects, 270329. Slavica Bergensia 13. Bergen: John Grieg AS.
138. Seržant Ilja A. ,, to appear-a. Dative experiencer constructions as a Circum-Baltic isogloss. In Arkadiev ,, Peter ,, Axel Holvoet ,, Björn Wiemer (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Baltic Linguistics . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
139. Seržant Ilja A. ,, to appear-b. Animacy-driven domin Russian. In Seržant ,, Ilja A. ,, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich ,and Kelsey Mann (eds.), The Diachronic Typology of Differential Argument Marking . [Studies in Diversity Linguistics]. Berlin: Language Science Press.
140. Seržant Ilja A. ,, to appear-c. An approach to syntactic reconstruction. In Vitti Carlotta (ed.), Perspectives on Historical Syntax , Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
141. Smith Carlota S . 1997. The Parameter of Aspect. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
142. Švedova Natalija Ju . (ed.). 1980. Russkaja grammatika . Tom 2. Moskva: Nauka.
143. Stolz Thomas . 1991. Sprachbund im Baltikum? Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum einer sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft. Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 13. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
144. Suihkonen Pirkko ,. 2012: "On aspect, aspectual domain and quantification in Finnish and Udmurt". In Suihkonen , Pirkko , Bernard Comrie ,and Valery Solovyev (eds.), Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology , 325354. slcs. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
145. Tamm Anne . 2006: Estonian transitive verbs and object case. In Butt, Miriam and Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the lfg06 Conference,484–504. Universität Konstanz: csliPublications ( .
146. Tatevosov Sergej G. 2002. Semantika sostavljajuščix imennoj gruppy: kvantornye slova . Moscow: IMLI RAN.
147. Tatevosov Sergei ,and Ivanov Mikhail ,. 2009. "Event structure of non-culminating accomplishments". In Hogeweg ,, Lotte ,, Helen de Hoop ,and Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Cross-linguistic Semantics of Tense, Aspect, and Modality , 83129. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
148. Timberlake Alan . 2004. A Reference Grammar of Russian . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
149. Traugott Elisabeth ,. 2003. "Constructions in Grammaticalization". In Joseph Bryan ,and Janda Richard D. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics , 62446. Malden, Mass: Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756393.ch20
150. Tveite Tor . 2004. The case of the object in Livonian . A corpus based study. Master's thesis. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
151. Veenker Wolfgang . 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University.
152. Vendler Zeno 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
153. Wiedemann Ferdinand J. 1973. Estnisch-deutsches Wörterbuch. 4. Nachdruck. Tallinn: K. Akad. d. Wissenschaft.
154. Wiemer Björn ,, Seržant Ilja A. ,and Erker Aksana ,. 2014. "Convergence in the Baltic-Slavic contact zone. Triangulation approach". In Besters-Dilger Juliane ,, Dermarkar Cynthia ,, Pfänder Stefan ,and Rabus Achim (eds.), Congruence in Contact-Induced Language Change , 1542. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
155. Zimmermann Thomas Ede . 1993. "On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs", Natural Language Semantics Vol 1: 14979.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00802006
Loading
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/19552629-00802006
2015-02-27
2018-04-20

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation