Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Function of Mouthparts in Feeding Behavior of Phyllosoma Larvae of the Packhorse Lobster, Jasus Verreauxi (Decapoda: Palinuridae)

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Journal of Crustacean Biology

Abstract Stage IV phyllosoma larvae of the packhorse lobster, Jasus verreauxi (H. Milne Edwards, 1851), were observed while feeding to determine the processing ability and involvement of mouthparts. Phyllosomata were presented live brine shrimp, Artemia salina (Linnaeus, 1758), mussel flesh, Perna canaliculus (Gmelin, 1791), and jellyfish, Aurelia sp., and were given chemical or tactile stimulation to induce a feeding response. Larvae were observed tearing their food with maxillipeds 2 and 3, before maceration by maxillipeds 2 and maxillae 1, mastication by mandibles and labrum, and subsequent ingestion of finer particles via a suction action induced by foregut contractions. Phyllosomata became entangled in food material and did not feed when provided soft tissue, such as jellyfish and mussel gonad. Maxilliped action increased when larvae were provided with harder prey, which indicated greater energetic investment required to process the food. Our observations suggest that phyllosomata are capable of processing fleshier prey items than Artemia, which is traditionally used as food in artificial culture. An ideal food source for phyllosomata should not readily break up and foul the water, should be free of microbes, and should be energetically economical to capture and masticate.

Affiliations: 1: a (MN)(DR) Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-05, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia (corresponding author (MN) mmnelson@utas.edu.au) ; 2: c (SC) Institute of Aquatic and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Private Bag 92019, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand ( S.Cox@auckland.ac.nz) ; 3: b (DR David.Ritz@utas.edu.au);

Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/20021975-99990271
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/20021975-99990271
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/20021975-99990271
2002-01-01
2017-04-27

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Journal of Crustacean Biology — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation