Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Miracles, Hinges, and Grammar in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

In §513 of On Certainty Wittgenstein asks “What if something really unheard-of happened?” But with this question he is not asking us to make a forecast, a prediction, or some sort of empirico-psychological prophecy about our possible reactions. As I will attempt to show, the question regarding the unheard-of is part of Wittgenstein’s philosophical method—which is to say, it is one of the instruments with which he combats what he sees as the principal source of the confusions of philosophy: mistaking the grammatical for the empirical or, as he also says, the conceptual for the factual. In this sense the question regarding the unheard-of can shed some light on the grammatical status of what he calls “hinges.”

Affiliations: 1: Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy lperissi@unive.it

10.1163/22105700-00603005
/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-00603005
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-00603005
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Braithwaite R.B. (1938). “"The Relevance of Psychology to Logic",” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , suppl. Vol vol. 17: 1941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/17.1.19
2. Brown C. (1984). Miracles and the Critical Mind . Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.
3. Burns R.M. (1981). The Great Debate on Miracles: From Joseph Glanville to David Hume . East Brunswick: Associated University Presses.
4. Fogelin R. (2003). A Defense of Hume on Miracles . Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
5. Hobbes T. , (1994). " Leviathan ", in Leviathan, with selected variants from the Latin edition of 1668 . Edited by Curley E. . Indianapolis: Hackett.
6. Hume D. , (1999). An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding . Edited by Beauchamp T. . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Moore G.E. (1970). Philosophical Papers . London: George Allen & Unwin.
8. Moyal-Sharrock D. , (2013). “"Realism, but Not Empiricism: Wittgenstein versus Searle".” In Racine T. , and Slanet K. (eds.), A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Use of Conceptual Analysis in Psychology , 152 171. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Rundle B. (2006). Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Russell B . (1936). “"The Limits of Empiricism",” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Vol 36: 131150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/36.1.131
11. ———. (1998). Problems of Philosophy . 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Spinoza B. (1989). Tractatus teologico-politicus . Translated by S. Shirley. Leiden: Brill.
13. Taylor J.E. (2007). “"Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism",” Philosophy Compass Vol 2/4: 611624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x
14. Wittgenstein L. (1974a). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus . Translated D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
15. ———. (1974b). On Certainty . 2nd edition. Edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. Von Wright; translated by D. Paul and G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16. ———. (1978). Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics . 2nd edition. Edited by G.H. von Wright, R. Rhees, and G.E.M. Anscombe; translated G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
17. ———. (1979). Notebooks 1914–1916 . 2nd edition. Edited by Anscombe G.E.M. , and Von Wright G.H. ; translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
18. ———. (1980). Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology , vol. I. Edited by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. Von Wright; translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
19. ———. (1993). Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951 . Edited by J. Klagge , and A. Nordmann . Indianapolis: Hackett.
20. ———. (1998). Culture and Value. A Selection from the Posthumous Remains . Edited by G.H. von Wright with Heikki Nyman; revised edition by A. Pichler; translated by P. Winch. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. ———. (2003). “"Movements of Thought: Diaries, 1930–1932, 1936–1937".” In Klagge J. , and Nordmann A. (eds.), Public and Private Occasions , 3256. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
22. ———. (2009). Philosophical Investigations . 4th edition. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker, and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-00603005
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-00603005
2016-05-23
2018-06-20

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation