Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Davies on Easy Knowledge

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

Stewart Cohen considers a case where his son wants a red table for his room. Cohen and his son go to the furniture store. Cohen’s son is concerned that the table his father is considering purchasing, which appears red, may in fact be white with red lights shining on it. Cohen responds with the following reasoning: (WARRANT FOR 1) The table looks red. (EK) (1)The table is red.(2)If the table is red, then it is not white with red lights shining on it.(3)The table is not white with red lights shining on it.If one reasons thus, say one’s engaged in (EK)-reasoning. Cohen finds such a response unsatisfactory. It is not a way of coming to know (3)—it is too easy. And structurally similar reasoning delivers (knowledge of) the falsity of sceptical hypotheses concerning the external world, testimony, other minds etc. So the unsatisfactoriness threatens to generalise. I consider Martin Davies’s attempt to diagnose this unsatisfactoriness and find it incomplete. I then attempt to remedy the incompleteness in Davies’s attempt.

Affiliations: 1: National University of Singapore,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Beebe J. ( 2010). “ "Constraints on Skeptical Hypotheses",” The Philosophical Quarterly Vol 60: 44970.
2. Cohen S. ( 1999). “ "Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons",” Philosophical Perspectives Vol 13: 5789.
3. ——. ( 2002). “ "Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge",” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol 65: 30929.
4. ——. ( 2005). “ "Why Basic Knowledge is Easy Knowledge",” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol 70: 41730.
5. Copi I. ( 1961). Introduction to Logic . New York: Macmillan.
6. Davies M. ,( 2000). “ "Externalism and Armchair Knowledge",” 384414in Boghossian P. ,& Peacocke C. (eds.), New Essays on the A Priori . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. ——. ( 2003). “ "The Problem of Armchair Knowledge",” 2355in Nuccetelli S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. ——. ( 2004). “ "Epistemic Entitlement, Warrant Transmission and Easy Knowledge".” Proceedings of the Aristotlelian Society: Supplementary Volume Vol 78: 21345.
9. ——. ( 2009). “ "Two Purposes of Arguing and Two Epistemic Projects",” 33783in Ravenscroft I. (ed.), Minds, Ethics, and Conditionals: Themes from the Philosophy of Frank Jackson . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Dretske F. ( 1970). “ "Epistemic Operators",” Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol 49: 122.
11. ——. ( 1971). “ "Conclusive Reasons",” Australasian Journal of Philosophy Vol 49: 122.
12. ——. ( 2005). “ "The Case Against Closure",” 1325in Steup M. ,& Sosa E. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology . Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Hawthorne J. ,( 2005). “ "The Case For Closure",” 2642in Steup M. ,& Sosa E. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology . Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Jackson F. ( 1987). Conditionals . Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Nozick R. ( 1981). Philosophical Explanations . Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.
16. Silins N. ( 2007). “ "Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic",” Oxford Studies in Epistemology Vol 2: 10840.
17. White R. ( 2006). “ "Problems for Dogmatism",” Philosophical Studies Vol 131: 52557.
18. Wright C. ( 1991). “ "Scepticism and Dreaming: Imploding the Demon",” Mind Vol 100: 87116.
19. ——. ( 2007). “ "The Perils of Dogmatism",” 2548in Nuccetelli S. ,& Seay G. (eds.), Themes from G.E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation