Pick Your Poison: Beg the Question or Embrace Circularity
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
You must be logged in to use this functionality
According to Roderick Chisholm, there are three ways of responding to the Problem of the Criterion and they all leave something to be desired. Michael DePaul, Paul Moser, and Earl Conee have each proposed variations of a fourth way of responding to this problem that rely on reflective equilibrium. We argue that these four options for responding to the Problem of the Criterion leave one with a tough choice: accept one of the three that Chisholm describes or DePaul’s reflective equilibrium approach and beg the question or accept a reflective equilibrium response of the sort Conee and Moser propose and embrace epistemic circularity.
Full text loading...
Amico R. ( 1993). The Problem of the Criterion . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Braithwaite R. ( 1953). Scientific Explanation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chisholm R. ( 1973). The Problem of the Criterion . Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
——. ( 1983). The Foundations of Knowing . Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
——. ( 1989). Theory of Knowledge , 3 rdedition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Conee E. ,( 2004). “ "First Things First",” 11–36 in Conee E. ,& Feldman R. , Evidentialism . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DePaul M. ( 1988). “ "The Problem of the Criterion and Coherence Methods in Ethics",” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol 18: 67– 87.
Goodman N. ( 1953). Fact, Fiction, and Forecast . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moser P. ( 1989). Knowledge and Evidence . New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rawls J. ( 1971). A Theory of Justice . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vogel J. ( 2008). “ "Epistemic Bootstrapping",” Journal of Philosophy Vol 105: 518– 39.
Walton D. ( 1991). Begging the Question: Circular Reasoning as a Tactic of Argumentation . New York: Greenwood Press.