Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

How not to Argue from Science to Skepticism

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of International Journal for the Study of Skepticism

For at least several decades, and arguably since the time of Descartes, it has been fashionable to offer scientific or quasi-scientific arguments for skepticism about human knowledge. I critique five attempts to argue for skeptical conclusions from the findings of science and scientifically informed common sense.

Affiliations: 1: Acadia University,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Austin J. L. ( 1962). Sense and Sensibilia . London: Oxford University Press.
2. Beilby J. (ed.). ( 2002). Naturalism Defeated?: Essays on Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism . Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
3. Brueckner A. ( 2005). “ "Fallibilism, Underdetermination, and Skepticism",” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol 7: 384391.
4. Cornman J. W. ,, Lehrer K. ,& Pappas G. S. ( 1992). Philosophical Problems and Arguments: An Introduction . Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
5. Dancy J. ,( 1992). “ "Moral Epistemology",” 286–90 in Dancy J. ,& Sosa E. (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology . Oxford: Blackwell.
6. Frances B. ( 2005). Scepticism Comes Alive . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Klein P. ( 1995). “ "Skepticism and Closure: Why the Evil Genius Argument Fails",” Philosophical Topics Vol 22: 21336.
8. Levin M. ( 2000). “ "Demons, Possibility and Evidence",” Noûs Vol 34: 42240. [Crossref]
9. Maitzen S. ( 2010). “ "A Dilemma for Skeptics",” Teorema Vol 29: 2334.
10. McDowell J. ( 1998). Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality . Cambridge, MA, & London: Harvard University Press.
11. Quine W. V. ,( 1975). “ "The Nature of Natural Knowledge",” 67–81 in Guttenplan S. (ed.), Mind and Language . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. ——. ( 1981). Theories and Things . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Randall L. ( 2005). Warped Passages . New York: Harper Collins.
14. Russell B. ( 1998). The Problems of Philosophy . 2nd edition. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Stroud B. ( 1984). The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16. ——. ( 1994). “ "Skepticism, ‘Externalism’, and the Goal of Epistemology",” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , Supp. Vol. Vol 68: 291307.
17. Vinci T. ( 1986). “ "Critical Notice of Barry Stroud: The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism ",” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol 16: 55974.

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    International Journal for the Study of Skepticism — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation