Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

In Defense of the Explanationist Response to Skepticism

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this advance article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

Affiliations: 1: University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States, mccain@uab.edu

10.1163/22105700-20171238
/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-20171238
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-20171238
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-20171238
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22105700-20171238
2017-08-06
2017-11-18
1. Beebe J. (2009). “"The Abductivist Reply to Skepticism",” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol 79: 605636.
2. BonJour L. (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. BonJour L.,, & Sosa E.. (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues . Malden, ma: Blackwell Publishing.
4. Braithwaite R.B. (1953). Scientific Explanation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Carnap R. (1968). “"Inductive Logic and Inductive Intuition",” Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics Vol 51: 258314.
6. Enoch D.,, & Schechter J. (2008). “"How are Basic Belief-Forming Methods Justified?”" Philosophy and Phenomenological Research Vol 76: 547579.
7. Fine A., (1984). “"The Natural Ontological Attitude".” In Leplin J. (ed.), Scientific Realism , 83107. Berkeley, ca: University of California Press.
8. Goldman A. (1988). Empirical Knowledge . Berkeley, ca: University of California Press.
9. Harman G. (1965). “"The Inference to the Best Explanation",” Philosophical Review Vol 74: 8895.
10. Harman G. (1973). Thought . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
11. Harman G. (1986). Change in View . Cambridge, ma: mit Press.
12. Hintikka J. (1998). "“What Is Abduction? The Fundamental Problem of Contemporary Epistemology,”" Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy Vol 34: 503533.
13. Kyburg Jr.,H. (1956). “"The Justification of Induction",” Journal of Philosophy Vol 53: 394400.
14. Kyburg Jr.,H. (1965). “"Comments on Salmon’s ‘Inductive Evidence’",” American Philosophical Quarterly Vol 2: 274276.
15. Lipton P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation , 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
16. Locke J., (1690/1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding . Edited by Nidditch P.H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17. Lycan W. (1988). Judgement and Justification . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lycan W., (2002). “"Explanation and Epistemology".” In Moser P. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology , 408433. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Lycan W. (2012). “"Explanationist Rebuttals (Coherentism Defended Again)",” Southern Journal of Philosophy Vol 50: 520.
20. McCain K. (2014). Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification . New York: Routledge.
21. McCain K. (2016). The Nature of Scientific Knowledge: An Explanatory Approach . Dordrecht: Springer.
22. Minnameier G. (2004). “"Peirce-Suit of Truth-Why Inference to the Best Explanation and Abduction Ought Not to Be Confused",” Erkenntnis Vol 60: 75105.
23. Papineau D. (1993). Philosophical Naturalism . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
24. Poston T. (2014). Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25. Psillos S. (1996). “"On Van Fraassen’s Critique of Abductive Reasoning",” Philosophical Quarterly Vol 46: 3147.
26. Psillos S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth . New York: Routledge.
27. Thagard P. (1978). “"The Best Explanation: Criteria for Theory Choice",” Journal of Philosophy Vol 75: 7692.
28. van Cleve J. (1984). “"Reliability, Justification, and the Problem of Induction",” Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol 9: 555567.
29. van Fraassen B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry . Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30. Vogel J. (1990). “"Cartesian Skepticism and Inference to the Best Explanation",” Journal of Philosophy Vol 87: 658666.
31. Vogel J., (2005). “"The Refutation of Skepticism".” In Steup M., & Sosa E. (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology , 7284. Malden, ma: Blackwell Publishing.
32. Vogel J., (2008). “"Internalist Responses to Skepticism".” In Greco J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism , 533556. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. White R. (2005). “"Explanation as a Guide to Induction",” Philosopher’s Imprint Vol 5: 129.
Submit comment
Close
Comment moderation successfully completed

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation