Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

BACON, HOBBES E L'IDEA DI «PHILOSOPHIA NATURALIS»: DUE MODELLI DI RIFORMA DELLA SCIENZA

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

This Article is currently unavailable for purchase.
Add to Favorites

Cover image Placeholder

<title> SUMMARY </title>In seventeenth-century English thought, Bacon and Hobbes offer two different ways of thinking about the architecture of sciences and the methods of acquisition of knowledge. Between these two thinkers is a different conception of the philosophia naturalis. This category involves logical and metaphysical matters: the definition of the demonstrative status of science; the function of «pure» mathematics in natural philosophy; the goals of the philosophia prima in the encyclopedia of sciences; the relation between facts and theories; the practical ends of science.In the recognition of possible Baconian influences, a difference is raised about the role of the ratio mathematicarum. According to Hobbes, mathematical reasoning is the fulcrum of the philosophy of knowledge and of nature, while for Bacon it has an 'ancillary' function with regard to the ars indicii as a method for the discovery of causes and forms of reality. Nevertheless, the Baconian bestowal of an «auxiliary» role to mathematics does not render quantitative reasoning less operative in experimental procedures of natural philosophy; Bacon takes the quantitative as a necessary condition for the control and the operative extension of experiment.

Affiliations: 1: Dipartimento di Filosofia, Universita della Calabria

10.1163/221058703X00057
/content/journals/10.1163/221058703x00057
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
6
3
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/221058703x00057
Loading

Data & Media loading...

http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/221058703x00057
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/221058703x00057
2016-10-01

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation