Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Lacking Rights and Justice in a Burning World: The Case for Granting Standing to Future Generations in Climate Change Litigation

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The exacerbation of climate change effects has rendered the legal adaptation of granting future generations standing in climate change litigation, necessary to achieve intergenerational justice and to protect their human rights. International law and norms do not operate in a legal vacuum. Instead, they possess the evolutionary quality to respond to societal shifts specifically seen in climate change action. This transient quality is greatly questioned in the debate surrounding the current legal lacuna concerning the lack of legal recognition for future generations in climate change actions. This has consequential effects on intergenerational justice and their human rights. Whilst international law has implemented a number of climate change mitigation strategies, these are insufficient in protecting future generations. The granting of standing in climate change litigation adequately complements the current approaches in resolving the lacuna in the law between theory and practice.

Affiliations: 1: University of New South Wales, Australia, rachel.johnston@student.unsw.edu.au

10.1163/22112596-02101002
/content/journals/10.1163/22112596-02101002
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22112596-02101002
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Allen T, ‘"The Philippine Children’s case: Recognising Legal Standing for Future Generations"’ [1993–1994] 6 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 713.
2. Caney S,, ‘"Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Thresholds",’ cited in Gardiner S et al. (eds) Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (oup 2010).
3. Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution [1973] 993 U.N.T.S. 243.
4. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora [1973] 992 U.N.T.S. 243.
5. Cox R, ‘"The Liability of European States for Climate Change"’ [2014] 30 (78) Utrecht J Int’l & Eur L 125.
6. De-Shalit A, Why Prosperity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations (Routledge, 1995).
7. Faure M, and Nollkaemper A, ‘"International Liability as an Instrument"’ [2007] 43 Stan. J. Int’l L.Vol 124.
8. Faure M, ‘"Climate Change Adaptation and Compensation"’ in Jonathan Verschuuren (eds), Research Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation Law (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2013).
9. Gardiner S, ‘"Climate Justice"’ in Dryzek J.S, et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society (oup 2011).
10. Ghaleigh N.S, ‘"Six Honest Serving Men’: Climate Change Litigation as Legal Mobilization and the Utility of Typologies"’ [2010] 1 Climate Law 31.
11. Gordon J, ‘"Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to Hold Hearing after Rejecting Inuit Climate Change Petition"’ [2007] Winter, Sust. Dev. L. & Pol’yVol 55.
12. Herstein O, ‘"The identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations"’ [2009] 77 Geo. Wash L. Rev.Vol 1173.
13. Horn L, ‘"Climate Change Litigation Actions for Future Generations"’ [2008] Environment and Planning Law Journal 115.
14. Howarth R, ‘"Intergenerational Justice"’ in Dryzek J.S et al. (eds), The Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society (oup 2011).
15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report (cup 1996).
16. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2007, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (cup 2007).
17. International Law Commission, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts [2001] Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.iv.E.1, art. 13.
18. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [1998] 37 I.L.M. 22.
19. Lawrence P, Justice for future generations: climate change and international law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).
20. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency [2007] 127 S Ct 1438.
21. Mines de Potasse d’Alsace S.A. (mdpa) v. Onroerend Goed Maatschappij Bier B.V. et al [1988] hr Dutch Supreme Court, nj 1989/743.
22. Nussbaum M, ‘"Capabilities and Rights"’ in Pablo de Greiff and Ciaran Cronin (eds) Global Justice and Transnational Politics: Essays on the Moral and Political Challenges of Globalization (mit Press 2002).
23. Page E, ‘"Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations"’ in Lawrence P (ed), Justice for future generations: climate change and international law (Edward Elgar Publishing 2014).
24. Parfit D, ‘"Energy policy and the further future: the identity problem"’ in Maclean D and Brown P (eds), Energy and the Future (Rowman & Littlefield 1983).
25. Parry M,, Canziani O et al (eds), Climate Change 2007, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (cup 2007).
26. R v. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Pollution, ex parte Greenpeace Ltd. [1994] 4 all E.R 329.
27. Re Minors Oposa v. Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources [1994] 33 ilm 174.
28. Sax J, ‘"The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: effective judicial intervention"’ [1970] 68 Mich. L. Rev.Vol 471.
29. Schlosberg D, Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature (oup 2007).
30. Review Stern, ‘The Economics of Climate Change, Chapter 2 “Economics, Ethics and Climate Change”’ in unicef uk, A Brighter Tomorrow: Climate Change, Child Rights and Intergenerational Justice’ (Report, UNICEF 2007).
31. Stone C, Should trees have standing? And other essays on law, morals and the environment (Oceana Publications Dobbs Ferry 1996).
32. The Center For International Environmental Law, ‘Climate Change & Human Rights: A Primer’ <> accessed 29 November 2015.
33. Tremmel J, A Theory of Intergenerational Justice (Earthscan 2009).
34. un Environment Programme, Convention on the conservation of migratory species of wild animals [1983] 1651 unts 333.
35. un Environmental Program, 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development [1992] un Doc. A/conf.151/26 (vol 1).
36. un Framework Convention on Climate Change [1992] 1771 U.N.T.S 107.
37. un General Assembly, United Nations Conference on the Human Environment [1972] A/res/2994.
38. un General Assembly, Universal Declaration of Human Rights [1948] 217 A (iii).
39. un Human Rights Council, Resolution 7/23. Human Rights and Climate Change [2008] U.N Doc. A/hrc/res/7/23.
40. Urgenda Foundation v. The State of the Netherlands (Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment) [2005] C/09/456689/ha za 13–1396.
41. Van Dijk C, ‘"Civil Liability for Global Warming in the Netherlands"’ in Faure M and Peeters M (eds), Climate Change Liability (Edward Elgar Publishing Limited 2011).
42. Vanderheiden S, Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change (oup 2008).
43. Watt-Cloutier S, Petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights Seeking Relief from Violations Resulting From Global Warming Caused by Acts and Omissions of the United States < finalpetitionicc.pdf> accessed 29 November 2015.
44. Weiss E, ‘"The Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity"’ [1984] 11 Ecology L.Q. 495.
45. Wilde M, Civil Liability for Environmental Damage: A Comparative Analysis of Law and Policy in Europe and The United States (Kluwer Law International 2002).
46. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future (oup 1987).
47. Zemans F.K, ‘"Legal Mobilisation: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System’" [1983] 77 American Political Science Review 695.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22112596-02101002
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22112596-02101002
2016-03-24
2018-04-20

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Tilburg Law Review — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation