Full text loading...
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
WHY SUBCHAPTER S (PARTNERSHIP TAX TREATMENT FOR CLOSELY-HELD ELECTING CORPORATIONS) SHOULD BE RETAINED EVEN IF INTEGRATION BY SOME OTHER METHOD IS ENACTED IN THE UNITED STATES
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
2211-0046
You must be logged in to use this functionality
Preview this article:
WHY SUBCHAPTER S (PARTNERSHIP TAX TREATMENT FOR CLOSELY-HELD ELECTING CORPORATIONS) SHOULD BE RETAINED EVEN IF INTEGRATION BY SOME OTHER METHOD IS ENACTED IN THE UNITED STATES, Page 1 of 1
< Previous page Next page > /docserver/preview/22112596/2/4/22112596_002_04_S03_text-1.gif
Most cited this month
back to top