Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Telefonica v. United Mexican States

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/4, Procedural Order No. 1, 8 July 2013 (Eduardo Zuleta Jaramillo, Horacio Grigera Naón) and Dissenting Opinion in respect to Procedural Resolution No. 1 on Confidentiality (Ricardo Ramírez-Hernández)

image of The Journal of World Investment & Trade
Preview this article:
Zoom in

Telefonica v. United Mexican States, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/journals/22119000/15/3-4/22119000_015_03-04_S019_text-1.gif

Affiliations: 1: bhp Billiton, Santiago de Chile, Chile,; 2: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Santiago de Chile, Chile,


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    The Journal of World Investment & Trade — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation