Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Policy and Politics of the Cohort Participation Rate in Universities

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

The Case of Singapore and “SkillsFuture”

image of International Journal of Chinese Education

In the media and policy discourses in Singapore, comparisons have often been made with countries like Taiwan and South Korea to validate the Singapore government’s long time policy approach of maintaining the cohort participation rate (CPR) in public universities at around 25% to 30%. Considering the rates of youth unemployment in Taiwan (12.7%) and South Korea (9.5%), where the CPR in universities has hovered around 80% to 90%, it would appear that the problem is one of an over-supply of graduates. While Singapore has maintained a commitment to skills training and to fostering a well-resourced polytechnic sector and the technical and vocational education sector, the government announced in 2012 its plans to raise the country’s CPR in universities to 40% by the year 2020. It established new public-autonomous universities to fulfill this goal, and expanded study places in existing universities, nevertheless with the proviso that internships would central to the curriculum, and that the degrees on offer would be well-tuned to the job shortages in the economy.What policy and political factors explain this change in Singapore’s long-held approach to the CPR for universities, especially when compared to the cases of Taiwan and South Korea? This paper offers an explanation of the policy and politics that underpinned the issue of the number of university places in Singapore, and also an explanation of the Singapore government’s shift in policy in 2012—albeit a policy move that took place within the context and language of the government’s new SkillsFuture programme, in which the education institutions are expected to continue to be well plugged into the needs of industries.

Affiliations: 1: The HEAD Foundation hyloke@headfoundation.org ; 2: The HEAD Foundation s.gopinathan@headfoundation.org

10.1163/22125868-12340068
/content/journals/10.1163/22125868-12340068
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22125868-12340068
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Chan Heng Chee Hui Ong Jin, et al"“Politics in an Administrative State: Where Has the Politics Gone?”" Understanding Singapore Society 1997 Singapore Times Academic Press 294 306 [republication of original 1974 edition]
2. Chou Chuing Prudence Cheol Shin Jung, Postiglione Gerard, Huang Futao"“Who Benefits from Taiwan’s Mass Higher Education?”" Mass Higher Education Development in East Asia: Strategy, Quality, and Challenges 2015 accessed October 30, 2016 Singapore Springer 231 232
3. Committee on University Education Pathways Beyond 2015 (cuep) Report of the CUEP: Greater Diversity, More Opportunities: Final Report 2012 accessed October 30, 2016 Singapore Ministry of Education Singapore
4. Dore Ronald"“The Diploma Disease Revisited”" Institute of Development Studies, Bulletin 1980 accessed October 30, 2016Vol 11 2
5. Economic Committee The Singapore Economy: New Directions 1986 Singapore Ministry of Trade and Industry Singapore
6. Goh Keng Swee and the Education Study Team Report on the Ministry of Education, 1978 1979 Singapore Singapore National Printers
7. Institute of Singapore Chartered Accountants (isca) ISCA Pre-Budget Survey 2016 accessed October 30, 2016 Singapore ISCA
8. Ministry of Education, Singapore"Applied Study in Polytechnics and Institute of Technical Education Review (ASPIRE) Report: August 2014" accessed October 30, 2016
9. Tan Kelvin, Lam Peng Er Lee’s Lieutenants: Singapore’s Old Guard 1999 Sydney Allen & Unwin
10. World Bank Higher Education: The Lessons of Experience 1994 accessed October 30, 2016 Washington, D.C. World Bank 28 39
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22125868-12340068
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22125868-12340068
2017-02-24
2017-08-21

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    International Journal of Chinese Education — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation