Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Full Access Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and Others v. Argentine Republic

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and Others v. Argentine Republic

  • HTML
  • PDF
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

ICSID Case No. ARB/08/9 (formerly Giordano Alpi and others v. Argentine Republic), Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 2 February 2013 (Bruno Simma, Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel) and Dissenting Opinion of Santiago Torres Bernárdez, 2 May 2013

Preview this article:
Zoom in

Ambiente Ufficio S.p.A. and Others v. Argentine Republic, Page 1 of 1

| /docserver/preview/journals/22119000/15/1-2/22119000_015_01-02_S012_text-1.gif

Affiliations: 1: Max Planck Institute for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, Luxembourg


There is no abstract available for this article.


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation