This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
I accept this policy
Find out more here
Developments in the Inter-American Human Rights System 2011-12: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Domestic Violence
No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.
Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.
2213-1027
You must be logged in to use this functionality
This article examines two recent and significant case law developments in the key institutions of the Inter-American Human Rights System, namely the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The cases are Karen Atala Riffo and Children v Chile and Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v United States. The two cases examined are significant because of the creativity employed in the interpretation of human rights provisions and the application of regional human rights standards to domestic violence issues.
Abstract
This article examines two recent and significant case law developments in the key institutions of the Inter-American Human Rights System, namely the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The cases are Karen Atala Riffo and Children v Chile and Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v United States. The two cases examined are significant because of the creativity employed in the interpretation of human rights provisions and the application of regional human rights standards to domestic violence issues.
Full text loading...
back to top