Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

The Netherlands and the Gülen movement

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Sociology of Islam

The Gülen movement has been active among immigrant workers from Turkey in the Netherlands since the 1980s. Its first institutions—educational centers, boarding houses, schools, business associations—were established when a (partly) Dutch-educated second generation came to adulthood in the mid-1990s. Ağabeyler (“older brothers”) dispatched from Turkey remained in the background, while students and graduates of Dutch universities and colleges built up support networks in Dutch civil society and municipal administrations, finding official endorsement as well as subsidies for some of their initiatives. They encountered increasing opposition from a coalition of Kemalist and former leftist Turks and anti-Muslim Dutch politicians and journalists, reflecting changing attitudes towards Islam in Dutch popular discourse as well as power struggles in Turkey. Activities that had previously been praised and supported by Dutch counterparts, such as homework assistance centers, dormitories, and (secular) schools came under suspicion when public opinion was alerted that these were the initiatives of a non-transparent Muslim piety movement. In response to negative publicity that accused these schools of brainwashing and Islamic indoctrination, and to prove that it made positive contributions to social integration, the movement closed its dormitories for secondary school students. This was followed by intensified efforts to show success in secular ventures. The result turned the Gülen movement into arguably the most successfully integrated immigrant-based organization in the country.

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Utrecht University, Netherlands, m.vanbruinessen@uu.nl

10.1163/22131418-00104004
/content/journals/10.1163/22131418-00104004
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22131418-00104004
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Avcı Hanefi ( 2010). Haliç’te yaşayan Simonlar: Dün devlet, bugün cemaat[ Simons living in the Golden Horn district: yesterday the state, today the (Gülen) Congregation]. Ankara: Angora.
2. Bruinessen Martin van ( 2006). "After van Gogh: roots of anti-Muslim rage", paper presented at the Seventh Mediterranean Social and Political Research Meeting, Montecatini Terme, 22-26 March 2006. Online at: .
3. ——.( 2011). "Producing Islamic knowledge in Western Europe: discipline, authority, and personal quest". In: Bruinessen, Martin van and Stefano Allievi (eds), Producing Islamic knowledge: transmission and dissemination in Western Europe , pp. 127. Oxon: Routledge.
4. Canatan Kadir ( 2001). Turkse islam: perspectieven op organisatievorming en leiderschap in Nederland[ Turkish Islam: perspectives on organization and leadership in the Netherlands ]. [Unpublished PhD Thesis]: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.
5. Canatan Kadir ,, Oudijk C.H. ,and Ljamai Abdelilah ( 2003). De maatschappelijke rol van de Rotterdamse moskeeën[ The social role of Rotterdam’s mosques]. Rotterdam: Centrum voor Onderzoek en Statistiek.
6. Entzinger Han ,( 2003). "The rise and fall of multiculturalism: the case of the Netherlands". In: Joppke Christian ,and Ewa Morawska (eds), Toward assimilation and citizenship: immigrants in liberal nation-states , pp. 5986. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Fähmel Anita ( 2009). Dossier Fethullah Gülen. Een verkennend onderzoek naar de Fethullah Gülen organisatie en haar invloed in Rotterdam[ The Fethullah Gülen file: an exploratory investigation of the Fethullah Gülen organization and its influence in Rotterdam]. Rotterdam: Leefbaar Rotterdam. Online at: .
8. Hendrick Joshua D. ( 2013). Gülen: the ambiguous politics of market Islam in Turkey and the world . New York: New York University Press.
9. Human Rights Agenda Association( 2010). Ergenekon is our reality . Ankara: Rights Agenda Association Human . Online at: .
10. Jenkins Gareth H. ( 2009). Between fact and fantasy: Turkey's Ergenekon investigation . Silk Road Paper, Washington DC: Central Asia - Caucasus Institute. Online at: .
11. Landman Nico ( 1992). Van mat tot minaret: de institutionalisering van de islam in Nederland[ From prayer rug to minaret: the institutionalization of Islam in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.
12. NOVA( 2008). "Turkse beweging fundamentale (sic!) sekte? [Turkish movement a fundamentalist sect?]", TV broadcast, July 4, 2008. Archived at: .
13. Korteweg Anna ( 2005). "De moord op Theo van Gogh: gender, religie en de strijd over de integratie van migranten in Nederland [The murder of Theo van Gogh: gender, religion and the struggle over the integration of migrants in the Netherlands]", Migrantenstudies Vol 21( 4): 20523.
14. Prins Baukje ( 2004). Voorbij de onschuld: het debat over integratie in Nederland[ Beyond innocence: the debate on integration in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam: Van Gennep.
15. Rath Jan ,, Sunier Thijl ,and Meyer Astrid ( 1997). "Islam in the Netherlands: the establishment of Islamic institutions in a de-pillarizing society", Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie Vol 88( 4): 38995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1997.tb01633.x
16. Şık Ahmet ( 2011). İmamın ordusu[ The Imam’s army], unpublished but widely available online. Later published as kitap: "dokunan yanar"[ book: whoever touches on them gets burned]. Istanbul: Postacı Yayınları.
17. Turam Berna ( 2007). Between Islam and the state: the politics of engagement . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
18. Yavuz M. Hakan ,( 2003). "The Gülen movement: the Turkish Puritans". In: Yavuz M. Hakan ,and John L Esposito (eds), Turkish Islam and the secular state: the Gülen movement , pp. 1947. New York: Syracuse University Press.
19. ——( 2013). Toward an Islamic enlightenment: the Gülen movement Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Yükleyen Ahmet ( 2011). Localizing Islam in Europe: Turkish Islamic communities in Germany and the Netherlands . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22131418-00104004
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22131418-00104004
2014-04-30
2017-12-14

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Sociology of Islam — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation