Cookies Policy

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Multimodal Integration of Interval Duration: Temporal Ventriloquism or Changes in Pacemaker Rate?

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

image of Timing & Time Perception

Previous studies demonstrated that perceived duration of visual intervals is strongly influenced by conflicting auditory intervals. However, it remains unclear which mechanisms underlie this multimodal integration of interval duration. To investigate this issue, we employed a reproduction task with empty (Experiment 1) or filled (Experiment 2) intervals, and a paired-comparison task (Experiment 3) to assess perceived duration of visually marked intervals, which could be accompanied by auditory marked intervals with congruent (same) or conflicting (longer and shorter) durations. First, we predicted that conflicting auditory intervals would bias the perceived duration of visual intervals towards the duration of the auditory ones. Second, according to pacemaker-accumulator models, two different mechanisms might contribute to multimodal interval integration: changes in pacemaker rate or changes of the switch component based on temporal ventriloquism effects. In the former case, the multimodal bias effect should increase with increasing interval duration. In the latter case, the effect should remain constant across interval durations. All experiments showed a strong influence of auditory interval duration on perceived visual duration. In Experiments 1 and 2, this bias effect unexpectedly decreased with increasing interval duration, which might be due to limitations of the employed duration reproduction method. In Experiment 3, however, the observed multimodal bias effect remained clearly constant across all interval durations. This finding supports the idea that multimodal integration of conflicting time intervals is mainly determined by a temporal ventriloquism effect, which affects the switch component of a pacemaker-accumulator mechanism. In addition, we demonstrated that bimodal congruent intervals are perceived as longer than unimodal visual ones. For filled (Experiment 2), but not for empty (Experiment 1) intervals, this effect seems to be caused by an increase in pacemaker rate.

Affiliations: 1: Fachbereich Psychologie, University of Tübingen, Schleichstrasse 4, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany


Full text loading...


Data & Media loading...

1. Alais D. , Burr D. ( 2004). "The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration". Curr. Biol., Vol 14, 257262. [Crossref]
2. Bausenhart K. M. , de la Rosa M. D. , Ulrich R. (in press). "Multimodal integration of time: visual and auditory contributions to perceived duration and sensitivity". Exp. Psychol.
3. Bausenhart K. M. , Dyjas O. , Ulrich R. ( 2013). "Temporal reproductions are influenced by an internal reference: explaining the Vierordt effect". Acta Psychol., doi: .
4. Bendixen A. , Grimm S. , Schröger E. ( 2006). "The relation between onset, offset, and duration perception as examined by psychophysical data and event-related brain potentials". J. Psychophysiol., Vol 20, 4051. [Crossref]
5. Bertelson P. , Aschersleben G. ( 2003). "Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 1. Evidence from auditory–visual temporal order judgment". Int. J. Psychophysiol., Vol 50, 147155. [Crossref]
6. Brainard D. H. ( 1997). "The psychophysics toolbox". Spat. Vis., Vol 10, 433436. [Crossref]
7. Bush R. R. ( 1963). "Estimation and evaluation". In Luce R. D. , Bush R. R. , Galanter E. (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Vol Vol. 1(pp.  429469). New York: Wiley.
8. Chen K.-M. , Yeh S.-L. ( 2009). "Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception". Acta Psychol., Vol 130, 225234. [Crossref]
9. Ernst M. O. , Banks M. S. ( 2002). "Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion". Nature, Vol 415, 429433. [Crossref]
10. Ernst M. O. , Bulthoff H. H. ( 2004). "Merging the senses into a robust percept". Trends Cogn. Sci., Vol 8, 162169. [Crossref]
11. Getzmann S. ( 2007). "The effect of brief auditory stimuli on visual apparent motion". Perception, Vol 36, 10891103. [Crossref]
12. Gibbon J. ( 1977). "Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing". Psychol. Rev., Vol 84, 279325. [Crossref]
13. Gibbon J. , Church R. M. , Meck W. H. ( 1984). "Scalar timing in memory". Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., Vol 423, 5277. [Crossref]
14. Goldstone S. , Lhamon W. T. ( 1972). "Auditory–visual differences in human temporal judgment". Percept. Mot. Skills, Vol 34, 623633. [Crossref]
15. Green D. M. , Swets J. A. ( 1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
16. Hellstrom A. ( 1985). "The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of cognitive processes in comparing". Psychol. Bull., Vol 97, 3561. [Crossref]
17. Jazayeri M. , Shadlen M. N. ( 2010). "Temporal context calibrates interval timing". Nat. Neurosci., Vol 13, 10201026. [Crossref]
18. Klink P. C. , Montijn J. S. , van Wezel R. J. A. ( 2011). "Crossmodal duration perception involves perceptual grouping, temporal ventriloquism, and variable internal clock rates". Atten. Percept. Psychophys., Vol 73, 219236. [Crossref]
19. Lejeune H. , Wearden J. H. ( 2009). "Vierordt’s the experimental study of the time sense (1868) and its legacy". Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol., Vol 21, 941960. [Crossref]
20. Michels W. C. , Helson H. ( 1954). "A quantitative theory of time-order effects". Am. J. Psychol., Vol 67, 327334. [Crossref]
21. Morein-Zamir S. , Soto-Faraco S. , Kingstone A. ( 2003). "Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism". Cogn. Brain Res., Vol 17, 154163. [Crossref]
22. Pelli D. G. ( 1997). "The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies". Spat. Vis., Vol 10, 437442. [Crossref]
23. Penton-Voak I. S. , Edwards H. , Percival A. , Wearden J. H. ( 1996). "Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration". J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process., Vol 22, 307320. [Crossref]
24. Romei V. , De Haas B. , Mok R. M. , Driver J. ( 2011). "Auditory stimulus timing influences perceived duration of co-occurring visual stimuli". Front. Psychol., Vol 2, 215. [Crossref]
25. Ulrich R. , Nitschke J. , Rammsayer T. ( 2006). "Crossmodal temporal discrimination: assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model". Percept. Psychophys., Vol 68, 11401152. [Crossref]
26. Vierordt K. ( 1868). Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen [The experimental study of the time sense]. Tübingen, Germany: Laupp.
27. Walker J. T. , Scott K. J. ( 1981). "Auditory–visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones, and gaps". J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., Vol 7, 13271339. [Crossref]
28. Wearden J. H. ( 2003). "Applying the scalar timing model to human time psychology: progress and challenges". In Helfrich H. (Ed.), Time and mind II: information processing perspectives(pp.  2139). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
29. Wearden J. H. , Edwards H. , Fakhri M. , Percival A. ( 1998). "Why ‘sounds are judged longer than lights’: application of a model of the internal clock in humans". Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B, Vol 51B, 97120.
30. Wearden J. H. , Norton R. , Martin S. , Montford-Bebb O. ( 2007). "Internal clock processes and the filled-duration illusion". J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., Vol 33, 716729. [Crossref]
31. Wearden J. H. , Penton-Voak I. S. ( 1995). "Feeling the heat: body temperature and the rate of subjective time, revisited". Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B, Vol 48B, 129141.
32. Woodrow H. ( 1934). "The temporal indifference interval determined by the method of mean error". J. Exp. Psychol., Vol 17, 167188. [Crossref]

Article metrics loading...



Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
    Timing & Time Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation