Cookies Policy
X

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

I accept this policy

Find out more here

Earlier Effects Are More Often Perceived as One’s Own Action Effects

No metrics data to plot.
The attempt to load metrics for this article has failed.
The attempt to plot a graph for these metrics has failed.
The full text of this article is not currently available.

Brill’s MyBook program is exclusively available on BrillOnline Books and Journals. Students and scholars affiliated with an institution that has purchased a Brill E-Book on the BrillOnline platform automatically have access to the MyBook option for the title(s) acquired by the Library. Brill MyBook is a print-on-demand paperback copy which is sold at a favorably uniform low price.

Access this article

+ Tax (if applicable)
Add to Favorites
You must be logged in to use this functionality

When changes occur in our environment, we usually know whether we caused these changes by our actions or not. Yet, this feeling of authorship for changes — the so-called sense of agency (SoA) — depends on the temporal relationship between action and resulting change (i.e., effect). More precisely, SoA might depend on whether the effect occurs temporally predictable, and on the duration of the delay between action and effect. In previous studies, SoA was measured either explicitly, asking for the perceived control over external stimuli, or implicitly by measuring a characteristic temporal judgement bias (intentional binding, i.e., a shortening of the perceived interval between action and effect). We used a novel paradigm for investigating explicit SoA more directly by asking participants in a forced-choice paradigm whether they caused a temporally predictable or a temporally unpredictable effect by their action. Additionally, we investigated how the temporal contiguity of the effects influenced the participants’ explicit SoA. In two experiments (48 participants each), there was no influence of temporal predictability on explicit SoA. Temporally predictable and unpredictable effects were equally often rated as own effects. Yet, effects after shorter delays were more often perceived as own effects than effects after longer delays. These findings are in line with previous results concerning the influence of effect delay on other explicit measures of SoA and concluding that explicit SoA is stronger for early effects.

Affiliations: 1: Cognition, Action, and Sustainability Unit, Department of Psychology, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Germany

10.1163/22134468-00002091
/content/journals/10.1163/22134468-00002091
dcterms_title,pub_keyword,dcterms_description,pub_author
10
5
Loading
Loading

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134468-00002091
Loading

Data & Media loading...

1. Berberian B.,, Sarrazin J.-C.,, LeBlaye P.,, & Haggard P. (2012). "Automation technology and sense of control: A window on human agency". PLoS One , 7, e34075. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034075
2. Cravo A. M.,, Claessens P. M. E.,, & Baldo M. V. C. (2009). "Voluntary action and causality in temporal binding". Exp. Brain Res. , 199, 9599.
3. Cravo A. M.,, Claessens P. M. E.,, & Baldo M. V. C. (2011). "The relation between action, predictability and temporal contiguity in temporal binding". Acta Psychol. , 136, 157166.
4. Dewey J. A.,, & Carr T. H. (2013). "When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions". Consc. Cogn. , 22, 155166.
5. Ebert J. P.,, & Wegner D. M. (2010). "Time warp: Authorship shapes the perceived timing of actions and events". Consc. Cogn. , 19, 481489.
6. Engbert K.,, & Wohlschläger A. (2007). "Intentions and expectations in temporal binding". Consc. Cogn. , 16, 255264.
7. Engbert K.,, Wohlschläger A.,, & Haggard P. (2008). "Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered". Cognition , 107, 693704.
8. Haering C.,, & Kiesel A. (2012). "Mine is earlier than yours: Causal beliefs influence the perceived time of action effects". Front. Psychol. , 3, 18.
9. Haering C.,, & Kiesel A. (2015). "Was it me when it happened too early? Experience of delayed effects shapes sense of agency". Cognition , 136, 3842.
10. Haering C.,, & Kiesel A. (2016). "Time perception and the experience of agency". Psychol. Res. , 80, 286297.
11. Haggard P.,, Clark S.,, & Kalogeras J. (2002a). "Voluntary action and conscious awareness". Nat. Neurosc. , 5, 382385.
12. Haggard P.,, Aschersleben G.,, Gehrke J.,, & Prinz W., (2002b). "Action, binding, and awareness". In Prinz W., & Hommel B. (Eds), Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance (pp. 266285). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Humphreys G. R.,, & Buehner M. J. (2009). "Magnitude estimation reveals temporal binding at super-second intervals". J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. , 35, 15421549.
14. Kawabe T.,, Roseboom W.,, & Nishida S. (2013). "The sense of agency is action–effect causality perception based on cross-modal grouping". Proc. R. Soc. B , 280(1763), 20130991. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0991. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0991
15. Limerick H.,, Moore J. W.,, & Coyle D. (2015). Empirical evidence for a diminished sense of agency in speech interfaces. In Proc. 33rd Ann. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 39673970). New York, NY, USA. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702379. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702379
16. Moore J. W.,, & Obhi S. S. (2012). "Intentional binding and the sense of agency: A review". Consc. Cogn. , 21, 546561.
17. Moore J. W.,, Lagnado D.,, Deal D. C.,, & Haggard P. (2009). "Feelings of control: Contingency determines experience of action". Cognition , 110, 279283.
18. Nolden S.,, Haering C.,, & Kiesel A. (2012). "Assessing intentional binding with the method of constant stimuli". Consc. Cogn. , 21, 11761185.
19. Ruess M.,, Thomaschke R.,, Haering C.,, Wenke D.,, & Kiesel A. (2017a). "Intentional binding of two effects". Psychol. Res. , 111. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0892-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0892-4
20. Ruess M.,, Thomaschke R.,, & Kiesel A. (2017b). "The time course of intentional binding". Atten. Percept. Psychophys. , 79, 19.
21. Schneider W.,, Eschmann A.,, & Zuccolotto A. (2012). E-Prime user’s guide . Pittsburgh, PA, USA: Psychology Software Tools.
22. Sidarus N.,, & Haggard P. (2016). "Difficult action decisions reduce the sense of agency: A study using the Eriksen flanker task". Acta Psychol. , 166, 111.
23. Sidarus N.,, Chambon V.,, & Haggard P. (2013). "Priming of actions increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes". Consc. Cogn. , 22, 14031411.
24. Wen W.,, Yamashita A.,, & Asama H. (2015). "The influence of action-outcome delay and arousal on sense of agency and the intentional binding effect". Consc. Cogn. , 36, 8795.
http://brill.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1163/22134468-00002091
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1163/22134468-00002091
2017-12-08
2018-01-22

Sign-in

Can't access your account?
  • Tools

  • Add to Favorites
  • Printable version
  • Email this page
  • Subscribe to ToC alert
  • Get permissions
  • Recommend to your library

    You must fill out fields marked with: *

    Librarian details
    Your details
    Why are you recommending this title?
    Select reason:
     
    Timing & Time Perception — Recommend this title to your library
  • Export citations
  • Key

  • Full access
  • Open Access
  • Partial/No accessInformation